Jumat, 10 Januari 2020

Iran plane crash: Iranian regime denies shooting down Ukrainian passenger jet today - Live updates - CBS News

Iranian officials on Thursday denied claims that they mistakenly shot down a Ukrainian passenger jet. The plane crashed Wednesday soon after takeoff from Tehran's airport, killing everyone on board.

CBS News has learned that U.S. officials are confident Iran shot down the jetliner in the hours after the Iranian missile attack on U.S. targets earlier this week. There were 176 people killed in the crash: 82 Iranians, 63 Canadians, 11 Ukrainians, 10 Swedish, four Afghan, three German and three British nationals.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMinAFodHRwczovL3d3dy5jYnNuZXdzLmNvbS9saXZlLXVwZGF0ZXMvcGxhbmUtY3Jhc2gtdXMtb2ZmaWNpYWxzLWNvbmZpZGVudC1pcmFuLXNob3QtZG93bi1wYXNzZW5nZXItamV0LWJvdW5kLWZvci11a3JhaW5lLXRvZGF5LTIwMjAtMDEtMDktbGl2ZS1zdHJlYW0tdXBkYXRlcy_SAaABaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY2JzbmV3cy5jb20vYW1wL2xpdmUtdXBkYXRlcy9wbGFuZS1jcmFzaC11cy1vZmZpY2lhbHMtY29uZmlkZW50LWlyYW4tc2hvdC1kb3duLXBhc3Nlbmdlci1qZXQtYm91bmQtZm9yLXVrcmFpbmUtdG9kYXktMjAyMC0wMS0wOS1saXZlLXN0cmVhbS11cGRhdGVzLw?oc=5

2020-01-10 08:35:00Z
52780544880119

Oprah Winfrey advised Prince Harry and Meghan Markle on Megxit - Fox News

Oprah Winfrey advised Prince Harry and Meghan Markle about breaking free from the British royals and following their own path.

The TV queen — who attended the couple’s wedding and is also close to Meghan’s mom, Doria Ragland — discussed their “declaration of independence” and encouraged them to consider making a living in North America by building their own powerful brand.

Harry and Meghan have trademarked “Sussex Royal” as a brand on more than 100 properties in the UK, including clothing, stationery, photographs and educational and charitable endeavors — with predicted revenue of over $500 million.

OPRAH WINFREY BREAKS DOWN IN TEARS AFTER LADY GAGA RECALLS BEING REPEATEDLY RAPED AS A TEEN

They’ve gathered a coterie of powerful US players, including the Obamas, George and Amal ClooneySerena WilliamsJames Corden and Meghan’s designer pal Misha Nonoo, whose new husband, oil heir Michael Hess, has offered them a place to stay in one of the family’s three homes in the gated Malibu Colony — dubbed “Billionaire’s Beach” — we are told.

Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle, left, and Oprah Winfrey. (Getty Images/AP)

Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle, left, and Oprah Winfrey. (Getty Images/AP)

A source said, “Oprah was the first person to talk to Harry and Meghan about breaking free and doing their own thing, building on their own brand. She made them realize it was really possible.” A rep for Oprah declined to comment.

Harry collaborated with Oprah on a mental-health series for Apple TV+, to air later this year, and it is believed the pair had “frank conversations” about the turmoil he and Meghan have faced in the spotlight. In an astonishing interview, Harry revealed he thinks about the fate of his mother, Princess Diana, “every single time I see a camera … every time I see a flash.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Harry is also close to Barack Obama, and insiders say the prince could follow a similar after-presidency career path, involving philanthropy, speeches, book deals and documentaries.

Page Six can also reveal that Oprah’s BFF Gayle King is set to score the first interview with the Sussexes post-Megxit. King attended Meg’s NYC baby shower and visited them after the birth of baby Archie. A TV source said: “It’s hush-hush, but there’s no one else they would turn to.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvb3ByYWgtd2luZnJleS1hZHZpc2VkLXByaW5jZS1oYXJyeS1hbmQtbWVnaGFuLW1hcmtsZS1vbi1tZWd4aXTSAWhodHRwczovL3d3dy5mb3huZXdzLmNvbS9lbnRlcnRhaW5tZW50L29wcmFoLXdpbmZyZXktYWR2aXNlZC1wcmluY2UtaGFycnktYW5kLW1lZ2hhbi1tYXJrbGUtb24tbWVneGl0LmFtcA?oc=5

2020-01-10 06:05:56Z
52780542675596

Kamis, 09 Januari 2020

House to vote on war powers resolution limiting Trump's ability to act against Iran — watch live stream today, updates on Iran news - CBS News

Washington — The House is set to vote Thursday afternoon on a resolution limiting President Trump's ability to engage in hostilities against Iran under the 1973 War Powers Resolution, as Democrats attempt to reassert Congress' constitutional authority to declare war amid a tense standoff with the Islamic Republic. 

Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled the resolution on Wednesday, saying it would be sent to the House floor for a vote on Thursday. The resolution is sponsored by Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin, a freshman Democrat and former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency and the Department of Defense.


How to watch the war powers resolution vote 

  • What: The House votes on a resolution limiting President Trump's ability to take military action against Iran
  • Date: Thursday, January 9, 2020
  • Time: Approximately 4:15 p.m. ET
  • Location: Washington, D.C.
  • Online stream: Watch in the player above and on your mobile or streaming device

The president authorized a strike on Iranian military leader Qassem Soleimani last week without consulting or notifying Congress, incurring outrage from Democratic lawmakers as well as some Republicans.

Thursday's measure directs the president to "terminate the use of United States Armed Forces" against Iran without congressional authorization, except when necessary to "defend against an imminent armed attack." 

In a tweet Thursday, Mr. Trump said he hopes all House Republicans "will vote against Crazy Nancy Pelosi's War Powers Resolution."

"Also, remember her 'speed & rush' in getting the Impeachment Hoax voted on & done," he said. "Well, she never sent the Articles to the Senate. Just another Democrat fraud. Presidential Harassment!"

The resolution will almost certainly pass in the House, where Democrats have the majority. Restrictions on Mr. Trump's authority face dimmer prospects in the Senate, but cracks in the president's support among Republican senators began to emerge late Wednesday afternoon on Capitol Hill.

Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah fumed to reporters after a briefing by top administration officials about the strike that killed Soleimani and the intelligence underlying the legal justification for taking him out. Lee said the officials' presentation was so inadequate that it convinced him to support a similar war powers resolution backed by Democratic Senator Tim Kaine. Lee called the briefing "probably the worst briefing at least on a military issue I've seen," saying it was "insulting."

"They had to leave after 75 minutes while in the process of telling us we need to be good little boys and girls and not debate this in public," Lee said. Republican Senator Rand Paul also said the inadequacy of the briefing had convinced him to support Kaine's war powers measure.

The resolution in the House would direct the president to end hostilities with Iran under a section of the War Powers Resolution of 1973. That resolution, intended to constrain President Richard Nixon's powers in the final throes of the Vietnam War, says that any forces engaged in hostilities outside the U.S. "shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution."

A concurrent resolution would not require President Trump's signature to take effect. But legal questions about Congress' authority to direct the executive branch via concurrent resolution remain unresolved. In 1983, the Supreme Court struck down a similar provision dealing with concurrent resolutions in another law, according to an analysis by the Congressional Research Service. But some legal experts contend the War Powers Resolution's provision would survive legal scrutiny despite the court's ruling, citing several differences between the laws.

Pelosi also said Wednesday that the House may soon vote on legislation to repeal the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force, as well as additional legislation to prevent the president from spending funds on hostilities with Iran without explicit congressional authorization.

Earlier, Mr. Trump appeared to support de-escalation of tensions between the U.S. and Iran, after Iran launched ballistic rocket strikes targeting military bases housing U.S. forces in Iraq on Tuesday in response to Soleimani's death.

"I'm pleased to inform you, the American people should be extremely grateful and happy. No Americans were harmed in last night's attack by the Iranian regime," the president said in an address to the nation from the White House on Wednesday. "We suffered no casualties, all of our soldiers are safe and only minimal damage was sustained at our military bases."

Stefan Becket and Rebecca Kaplan contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNic25ld3MuY29tL25ld3MvaXJhbi1uZXdzLWhvdXNlLXRvLXZvdGUtb24td2FyLXBvd2Vycy1yZXNvbHV0aW9uLXRvLXJlaW4taW4tdHJ1bXBzLWF1dGhvcml0eS10by1zdHJpa2UtaXJhbi_SAX1odHRwczovL3d3dy5jYnNuZXdzLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy9pcmFuLW5ld3MtaG91c2UtdG8tdm90ZS1vbi13YXItcG93ZXJzLXJlc29sdXRpb24tdG8tcmVpbi1pbi10cnVtcHMtYXV0aG9yaXR5LXRvLXN0cmlrZS1pcmFuLw?oc=5

2020-01-09 15:11:00Z
52780536809258

Sen. Mike Lee lambasts briefing on Soleimani strike as "worst" he's received on military issue - CBS News

Republican Senators Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky excoriated a briefing from top Trump administration officials on the targeted drone strike that led to the death of Qassem Soleimani, the leader of Iran's elite Quds Force. Lee called it "worst briefing" he's received on a military issue in his nine years in the Senate.

Lee said it is "not acceptable" for officials from the executive branch — whether it be Defense Department, the CIA or the White House — to tell the Senate that they can't "debate and discuss the appropriateness of military intervention against Iran." 

"It's un-American, it's unconstitutional, and it's wrong," he added.

Trending News

The House is set to vote Thursday on a measure designed to limit Mr. Trump's military actions regarding Iran. Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia, has also introduced a war powers resolution in the Senate.

Lee said he will back Kaine's resolution once changes are made.

House to vote Thursday on war powers resolution

"I walked into the briefing undecided. I walked out decided, specifically because of what happened in that briefing," he said.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, CIA Director Gina Haspel and acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire conducted the briefing to the full Senate on last week's drone strike. The group met with House members to discuss the strike earlier in the day.

Lee said the suggestion from the administration's top military and national security officials that the Senate not debate military action in Iran was "insulting" and "demeaning to the process ordained by the Constitution."

"They left after 75 minutes. Now I understand these are busy people. They've got a lot of demands on their time," Lee said. "They're appearing before a coordinate branch of government, a coordinate branch of government responsible for their funding, for their confirmation, for any approval of any military action they might undertake. And they had to leave after 75 minutes while they're in the process of telling us we need to be good little boys and girls and run along and not debate this in public. I find that absolutely insane. I think it's unacceptable."

A White House official confirmed to CBS News' Paula Reid that Lee did not get to ask a question, but said the briefing lasted 90 minutes. The official added the White House hoped to come back to answer questions. 

The White House left the briefing with the impression that some lawmakers were upset with the decision to use force, but not with how the briefing was conducted, the official said. 

Paul said he also intends to support Kaine's war powers resolution.

"I wanted to hear the intelligence first," he told reporters, "What I heard was less than satisfying."

Mr. Trump ordered the drone strike that took out Soleimani in Baghdad last week. The president and administration officials have said the decision was in response to an "imminent threat" to American diplomats and service members. The White House on Saturday notified Congress of the strike under the War Powers Act.

Senate Democrats said after Wednesday's briefing that information they were provided by the administration did not describe an "imminent threat."

On Tuesday, Iran launched ballistic missiles against Iraqi military bases that house U.S. forces in retaliation for the strike that killed Soleimani.

Paula Reid contributed to this report. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMigQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5jYnNuZXdzLmNvbS9uZXdzL21pa2UtbGVlLXNlbmF0b3ItdXRhaC1sYW1iYXN0cy10cnVtcC1icmllZmluZy1zb2xlaW1hbmktc3RyaWtlLXdvcnN0LWhlcy1yZWNlaXZlZC1vbi1taWxpdGFyeS1pc3N1ZS_SAYUBaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY2JzbmV3cy5jb20vYW1wL25ld3MvbWlrZS1sZWUtc2VuYXRvci11dGFoLWxhbWJhc3RzLXRydW1wLWJyaWVmaW5nLXNvbGVpbWFuaS1zdHJpa2Utd29yc3QtaGVzLXJlY2VpdmVkLW9uLW1pbGl0YXJ5LWlzc3VlLw?oc=5

2020-01-09 13:31:00Z
52780536809258

Iran news: Iranian military commander vows "harsher revenge soon" today as Tehran residents breathe a sigh of relief - CBS News

Tehran — Hours after President Trump said Iran appeared to be "standing down" after an intense week of soaring tension, a senior Iranian military commander vowed Thursday that there would be "harsher revenge" taken against the U.S. Mr. Trump indicated on Wednesday that he plans no further military response against Iran in a statement intended to lower tension in the Middle East.

But the general chosen to replace Qassem Soleimani, the top Iranian commander killed in a targeted strike on Mr. Trump's order last week, said Thursday morning that he would follow the same path as his predecessor.

A commander of Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guards, meanwhile, issued the threat of "harsher revenge soon."

The messages show that the U.S. can't afford to let its guard down, but they also highlight continued deep divisions inside Iranian society. Iran's political leaders said Wednesday that the Islamic Republic had "concluded" its response to America's targeted killing of a top Iranian general.

CBS News senior foreign correspondent Elizabeth Palmer says that while Iran's military commanders are vowing to fight on, with the goal of getting U.S. forces to leave the region, the headline in Tehran on Thursday was that — in the short term — the Americans aren't planning another military strike.

Crisis in the Middle East: Fears of War with Iran

In the first real snowfall of the winter, residents of Iran's capital went about their business on Thursday feeling safer.

One resident, Caroline, told Palmer she had definitely been afraid of the prospect of an all-out war with the U.S. Like millions of others in Iran, she listened to President Trump's speech very closely.

She said she was relieved when he said there would not be any further American attack, and she "slept very well" after his remarks.

"The fact that we have this great military and equipment, however, does not mean we have to use it," Mr. Trump said Wednesday. "We do not want to use it."

On Iranian state-run TV, the president's decision not to strike back was framed as a climb-down by the U.S., and a win for Iran's Revolutionary Guards, who were able to showcase their missile arsenal with the strikes this week against Iraqi bases housing U.S. forces.

Those strikes were retaliation for the U.S. attack that killed Soleimani on Friday. His death brought millions of people into the streets of Iranian cities in a show of national unity, but the mourning masses didn't convey the whole story.

Just a few weeks ago, thousands of demonstrators were in the streets to vent their fury and frustration with their own government, for its corruption, ineptitude and repression.

But Palmer says the mood has changed completely since then, and for now the voices of dissent have gone quiet.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiggFodHRwczovL3d3dy5jYnNuZXdzLmNvbS9uZXdzL2lyYW4tbmV3cy1pcmFuaWFuLWNvbW1hbmRlci12b3dzLWhhcnNoZXItcmV2ZW5nZS10b2RheS10ZWhyYW4tcmVzaWRlbnRzLXNpZ2gtcmVsaWVmLXRydW1wLTIwMjAtMDEtMDkv0gGGAWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNic25ld3MuY29tL2FtcC9uZXdzL2lyYW4tbmV3cy1pcmFuaWFuLWNvbW1hbmRlci12b3dzLWhhcnNoZXItcmV2ZW5nZS10b2RheS10ZWhyYW4tcmVzaWRlbnRzLXNpZ2gtcmVsaWVmLXRydW1wLTIwMjAtMDEtMDkv?oc=5

2020-01-09 13:05:00Z
52780536809258

House to vote to limit Trump's military action against Iran without congressional approval - CNN

Freshman Democratic Rep. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, a former CIA analyst and senior Defense Department official, is the sponsor of the resolution, which calls on the President "to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces to engage in hostilities in or against Iran" unless Congress declares war or enacts "specific statutory authorization" for the use of armed forces.
Trump vs. Iran: It's not over
One additional exception outlined in the resolution is if the use of armed forces "is necessary and appropriate to defend against an imminent armed attack upon the United States."
A vote on the resolution will take place one day after President Donald Trump signaled a de-escalation of tensions with Iran, saying that "Iran appears to be standing down" in the wake of its retaliatory attacks against Iraqi bases housing US troops, which came after a US airstrike killed Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani.
Despite the apparent de-escalation, however, Democrats have continued to express alarm over the strike and the administration's justification in taking the action.
'The worst briefing I've had': Senate Iran briefing gets heated
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement on Wednesday that "members of Congress have serious, urgent concerns about the administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran and about its lack of strategy moving forward" and announced that the House would move forward with a war powers resolution vote.
The House resolution states that "when the United States military force, the American people and members of the United States Armed Forces deserve a credible explanation regarding such use of military force."
It also states that "Congress has not authorized the President to use military force against Iran."

Democrats push war powers resolutions in House and Senate

The House and Senate are both poised to take up war powers resolutions related to Iran.
In the Senate, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia introduced his own war powers resolution last week along with Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois. The measure is privileged, which means that the Republican-controlled Senate will have to hold a vote.
The resolution directs the President to remove US forces from hostilities with Iran no later than 30 days after the resolution is enacted absent a declaration of war by Congress or passage of a new authorization for use of military force, a type of measure that lawmakers can approve to green-light military action.
Even as the military conflict with Iran appeared to have de-escalated on Wednesday, Kaine said that he will continue to press ahead with his effort to limit Trump's authority on Iran.
He added, however, that the timing may be complicated by the fact that it's uncertain when a Senate impeachment trial will begin. But since it's privileged, the Senate must vote on it.
"What we learned from the last 18 months is ... this thing has been going up and down cycles ... and deliberation is the antidote to unnecessary escalation," Kaine said of conflict with Iran.

Democrats invoke War Powers Act in effort to rein in Trump

In their effort to restrain US conflict with Iran, congressional Democrats are invoking the War Powers Resolution, otherwise known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 or the War Powers Act.
The War Powers Act stipulates parameters of presidential and congressional war powers, including imposing procedural requirements to ensure that presidents keep Congress apprised of military decisions as well as provisions that provide Congress with a mechanism to suspend military operations initiated by the President in certain circumstances.
It was enacted after Congress overrode a veto from then-President Richard Nixon and is aimed at reining in a president's authority to engage the US in military action without congressional approval.
The Democratic-controlled House is expected to have the support needed to clear an Iran war powers resolution, but it is not yet clear if such a resolution would have the votes to pass in the Republican-led Senate.
Whatever the outcome of the vote, however, the resolutions ensure there will be an ongoing congressional debate over simmering hostilities with Iran.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiWGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8wOS9wb2xpdGljcy9ob3VzZS12b3RlLXdhci1wb3dlcnMtcmVzb2x1dGlvbi1pcmFuL2luZGV4Lmh0bWzSAVxodHRwczovL2FtcC5jbm4uY29tL2Nubi8yMDIwLzAxLzA5L3BvbGl0aWNzL2hvdXNlLXZvdGUtd2FyLXBvd2Vycy1yZXNvbHV0aW9uLWlyYW4vaW5kZXguaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-01-09 12:01:00Z
52780536809258

House to vote to limit Trump's military action against Iran without congressional approval - CNN

Freshman Democratic Rep. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, a former CIA analyst and senior Defense Department official, is the sponsor of the resolution, which calls on the President "to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces to engage in hostilities in or against Iran" unless Congress declares war or enacts "specific statutory authorization" for the use of armed forces.
Trump vs. Iran: It's not over
One additional exception outlined in the resolution is if the use of armed forces "is necessary and appropriate to defend against an imminent armed attack upon the United States."
A vote on the resolution will take place one day after President Donald Trump signaled a de-escalation of tensions with Iran, saying that "Iran appears to be standing down" in the wake of its retaliatory attacks against Iraqi bases housing US troops, which came after a US airstrike killed Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani.
Despite the apparent de-escalation, however, Democrats have continued to express alarm over the strike and the administration's justification in taking the action.
'The worst briefing I've had': Senate Iran briefing gets heated
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement on Wednesday that "members of Congress have serious, urgent concerns about the administration's decision to engage in hostilities against Iran and about its lack of strategy moving forward" and announced that the House would move forward with a war powers resolution vote.
The House resolution states that "when the United States military force, the American people and members of the United States Armed Forces deserve a credible explanation regarding such use of military force."
It also states that "Congress has not authorized the President to use military force against Iran."

Democrats push war powers resolutions in House and Senate

The House and Senate are both poised to take up war powers resolutions related to Iran.
In the Senate, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia introduced his own war powers resolution last week along with Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois. The measure is privileged, which means that the Republican-controlled Senate will have to hold a vote.
The resolution directs the President to remove US forces from hostilities with Iran no later than 30 days after the resolution is enacted absent a declaration of war by Congress or passage of a new authorization for use of military force, a type of measure that lawmakers can approve to green-light military action.
Even as the military conflict with Iran appeared to have de-escalated on Wednesday, Kaine said that he will continue to press ahead with his effort to limit Trump's authority on Iran.
He added, however, that the timing may be complicated by the fact that it's uncertain when a Senate impeachment trial will begin. But since it's privileged, the Senate must vote on it.
"What we learned from the last 18 months is ... this thing has been going up and down cycles ... and deliberation is the antidote to unnecessary escalation," Kaine said of conflict with Iran.

Democrats invoke War Powers Act in effort to rein in Trump

In their effort to restrain US conflict with Iran, congressional Democrats are invoking the War Powers Resolution, otherwise known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 or the War Powers Act.
The War Powers Act stipulates parameters of presidential and congressional war powers, including imposing procedural requirements to ensure that presidents keep Congress apprised of military decisions as well as provisions that provide Congress with a mechanism to suspend military operations initiated by the President in certain circumstances.
It was enacted after Congress overrode a veto from then-President Richard Nixon and is aimed at reining in a president's authority to engage the US in military action without congressional approval.
The Democratic-controlled House is expected to have the support needed to clear an Iran war powers resolution, but it is not yet clear if such a resolution would have the votes to pass in the Republican-led Senate.
Whatever the outcome of the vote, however, the resolutions ensure there will be an ongoing congressional debate over simmering hostilities with Iran.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiWGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8wOS9wb2xpdGljcy9ob3VzZS12b3RlLXdhci1wb3dlcnMtcmVzb2x1dGlvbi1pcmFuL2luZGV4Lmh0bWzSAVxodHRwczovL2FtcC5jbm4uY29tL2Nubi8yMDIwLzAxLzA5L3BvbGl0aWNzL2hvdXNlLXZvdGUtd2FyLXBvd2Vycy1yZXNvbHV0aW9uLWlyYW4vaW5kZXguaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-01-09 11:02:00Z
52780536809258