Rabu, 23 Oktober 2019

EU to rule on Brexit extension as UK faces possible election - CNBC

BRUSSELS — Brexit is set to be delayed for a third time after U.K. lawmakers rejected Prime Minister Boris Johnson's rushed timetable to force through the necessary laws to leave the European Union.

On Tuesday, a majority of MPs (Members of Parliament) signaled their support for the agreement that Johnson reached with the other 27 EU nations last week. However, in a follow up vote just 15 minutes afterwards, they refused to rush through the necessary legislation to leave the EU in three working days.

The U.K. is now in a holding pattern with Johnson pausing his Withdrawal Agreement Bill, which could still be scrapped altogether. This significantly reduces the chances that the U.K. will leave the EU on October 31, as the prime minister had vowed.

Media reports in Britain suggest that Downing Street will push for an election if Brexit is delayed until January. Potential dates for this vote would be December 5 or 12 and it would be the first winter general election in the country since 1974. Several betting firms now have the odds of a December election at over 50%.

But the immediate focus has now shifted from Westminster to Brussels. The other 27 countries need to decide if they will say yes to the U.K.'s request for an extension. Johnson had grudgingly informed the EU on Saturday that the U.K. Parliament needs more time, until the end of January 2020, to leave the EU.

"Following PM Boris Johnson's decision to pause the process of ratification of the Withdrawal Agreement, and in order to avoid a no-deal Brexit, I will recommend the EU27 accept the U.K. request for an extension," European Council President Donald Tusk, who is leading the extension discussions with the different EU leaders, said on Twitter Tuesday night.

It is unclear at this stage if the EU will accept the U.K. Parliament's request for a delay until January or decide on a different deadline. This decision will depend on the talks that Tusk has with the different leaders and whether any raise issues about a third delay. It needs to be a unanimous decision.

European leaders have been clear over the last week that their wish is to move on to the next phase of the process. The U.K.'s departure from the EU is made up of two steps: The divorce deal and a future trade deal.

"I hope we can stick to the timeline we gave ourselves and that the date of Oct. 31 is respected," Emmanuel Macron, France's president, told reporters in Brussels on Friday. Macron also said: "I do not think that another delay should be granted. We should end these negotiations and move on to talks on our future relations and get them done."

The EU believes that a further extension would prolong the uncertainty for citizens and businesses on both sides of the English Channel.

No emergency Brexit summit?

Tusk is also of the opinion that the EU should decide on the extension request by "written procedure," meaning without the need for an emergency Brexit summit in Brussels.

One EU official, who did not want to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue, told CNBC that EU leaders could decide on the delay as early as Thursday. "But it could easily become next week," the official said.

A second official working in Brussels, who also wanted to remain anonymous, told CNBC that "there's no indication" about the timing of the decision. Overall, it will depend on how the various countries feel about a third delay to Brexit, the source said.

Nonetheless, a meeting between the 27 European ambassadors is due to take place Wednesday. This group usually performs the background work ahead of any decision by European heads of state.

Sterling sunk slightly on Wednesday morning to 1.2868 against the dollar. The pound has been trending lower since breaking above $1.30 late last week as Johnson sealed his agreement with Brussels.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/23/eu-to-rule-on-brexit-extension-as-uk-faces-possible-election.html

2019-10-23 08:20:49Z
52780406083772

Hong Kong formally withdraws extradition bill - Fox News

The Hong Kong government on Wednesday said it formally withdrew its controversial extradition bill that sparked months of violent protests but will reportedly be the fulfillment of only one demand out of five by protesters who continue to take to the streets.

"I now formally announce the withdrawal of the bill," Secretary for Security John Lee told the city's legislature.

CROWD MEMBER AT NBA PANEL HOLDS UP HONG KONG FLAG

Hundreds of thousands have taken to the streets since June, originally due to the bill that would have allowed Hong Kong nationals to be sent to mainland China to be tried in Communist party-controlled court. The rallies have continued and now protesters demand political reforms and police accountability.

Reuters reported that pro-Democracy protesters have been insisting that all five of their demands are met "not one less." According to the Washington Post,  the other demands include an independent investigation into police conduct and amnesty for protesters who've been arrested.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

The Financial Times on Tuesday reported that the Chinese government is working on plans to replace Lam by March.

Lam was appointed for office in 2014 despite the fact her rival for the job, John Tsang, was far more popular with the general public, according to the Financial Times.

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/world/hong-kong-formally-withdraws-extradition-bill

2019-10-23 07:37:08Z
52780416261659

Murder suspect whose alleged crime sparked Hong Kong protests walks free - CNN

But as the global consequences of almost four months of unprecedented unrest continue to be felt, the story that started it all has slipped from the headlines. On Wednesday, one of the central players in that story walked free from a Hong Kong prison on minor charges, after authorities say he confessed to killing his girlfriend but, so far, avoided prosecution for it.
Chan Tong-kai was sentenced to prison by a judge in April 2019. Just over one year earlier, authorities say the then 19-year-old admitted to killing his girlfriend, 20-year-old Poon Hiu-wing, while the pair were in Taiwan. Poon would have been about 15 weeks pregnant at the time.
Though Chan was arrested in March 2018 and soon confessed to the killing, according to police, that wasn't why he was before a judge in April. Because Hong Kong and Taiwan have no extradition agreement, and do not usually provide cross-border legal assistance -- and because they couldn't prove the alleged murder was planned in Hong Kong beforehand -- prosecutors in the city were unable to charge Chan with murder. Instead, he was charged with the more minor offense of money laundering, in relation to cash and other valuables he stole from Poon after allegedly killing her.
Chan Tong-kai is transferred from court in April 2019 after being jailed for money laundering related offenses.
An attempt by Hong Kong's leader Carrie Lam to plug the extradition "loophole" with Taiwan, and at the same time allow suspects to be sent to China and Macao, led to months of intense anti-government protests, which were initially sparked by fears the extradition law could be used to rendition critics of Beijing across the border to face trial.
  • Chan Tong-kai case

  • 8 February: Chan and Poon travel to Taiwan.

    17 February: Chan and Poon argue in their Taipei hotel and he allegedly strangles her to death.

    13 March: Taipei police find Poon's body, Chan arrested in Hong Kong, police say he confessed to killing her.

    31 December: Chan pleads guilty to charges of money laundering in relation to cash stolen from Poon.

  • February: Hong Kong government proposes changes to extradition law to allow fugitives to be sent to Taiwan, China and Macao.

    29 March: Extradition bill published.

    12 April: Chan appears before the Hong Kong High Court on charges of money laundering, but not murder.

    29 April: Chan sentenced to 29 months in prison on charges of money laundering (having served over half his sentence).

    April-October: Protests escalate and become a weekly occurrence.

    23 October: Chan Tong-kai released from prison.


Source: CNN reporting
Those protests show no signs of stopping, and have only grown more chaotic and violent in recent weeks. But on October 23, Chan -- whose lawyers did not respond to a request for comment -- walked free, after 19 months behind bars on the money laundering charges.
What happens to him now is unclear. The Hong Kong government said Chan has offered to hand himself in to Taiwanese authorities, but how that will exactly take place is hotly contested. Taipei said it had requested Chan be handed into its custody in Hong Kong, along with his alleged confession and other documents relating to the case, but Hong Kong has pointed out Taiwanese police have no authority to operate in the city.
"The authority of Taiwan has no law enforcement power in Hong Kong. Chan is Taiwan's wanted person and his surrender decision is voluntary," Hong Kong's government said in a statement Wednesday. "As he will be a free man after released from jail, the (Hong Kong) Government has no authority to impose any restrictive measures on him. He could go to Taiwan accompanied by persons of his choice. Upon arrival, the authority of Taiwan can arrest him."
Chan is currently a free man. Speaking outside Pik Uk Prison on Wednesday morning, he said that "I understand that because of my irreversible wrongdoing, I have caused huge pain."
"I am willing to pay the price for my impulsiveness and my wrongdoing, which is to turn myself in to the Taiwanese authority and serve my sentence there," Chan said. "I can only say I am sorry. I hope everyone will forgive me, give me a chance to give back to the society."

Death at the Purple Garden Hotel

"She was a good daughter. In school, she was a good student," Poon Hiu-wing's mother told reporters in February. "What did she do to deserve this? Our family never imagined that such a horrible thing could happen to such a nice girl."
According to court documents, Poon and Chan met in July 2017.
On social media, Poon shared happy selfies of the two of them together. In one photo, she smiles at the camera, her eyes wide and her face framed by long, dark hair. She's holding Chan's arm as he stares into the camera, his bowl cut hair hiding his eyebrows. He has big ears which stick out from his hair, and a large birthmark under his left nostril.
Murder victim Poon Hiu-wing. Poon was five months pregnant when she was killed by her boyfriend Chan Tong-kai in Taiwan in February 2018.
In February 2018, the couple took a holiday to Taiwan. Before they left for Taipei, Poon wrote on Facebook that Chan had described her as "his first and last girlfriend."
Surveillance footage from the Purple Garden Hotel, verified by Taiwanese authorities, shows the couple returning soon after midnight on February 17. Chan is walking in front, carrying a large, apparently empty, pink suitcase with one hand. Poon follows a short distance behind him.
According to Chan's confession, as presented in court, that suitcase would be central to what happened next. In a WhatsApp message to her mother, authorities say Poon said they'd be returning to Hong Kong later on the 17th. But while they were packing in the early hours of the morning, they started arguing.
The spat soon turned into a blazing argument. According to Chan's confession, cited in court, Poon told him she was pregnant by her ex-boyfriend, not him. He says she then showed him a video of her having sex with another man.
That's when the situation escalated, the court heard -- Chan hit Poon's head against the wall of their hotel room and began strangling her from behind with both hands. They fell onto the floor, where they struggled for about 10 minutes until Poon was dead.
Confronted with the corpse of his pregnant girlfriend, Hong Kong officials say Chan turned again to the suitcase. He stuffed Poon's dead body into the pink case, folding her near in half to make her fit. He then threw her belongings into four plastic bags, according to court documents, and went to sleep.
At 11:25 a.m. on February 17, surveillance footage shows Chan leaving the hotel alone. He's lugging a now apparently very heavy pink suitcase behind him, and it moves awkwardly over the cobbles on the street outside. He has a baseball cap pulled lower over his head, and a black mask over his face.
He disposed of Poon's belongings in various trash bins near the hotel, according to court documents, and then dragged the suitcase to a nearby subway entrance. From Zhongshan station, Chan rode the red line north for 15 stops to Zhuwei station on the outskirts of Taipei, according to Taiwanese state media. There he started looking for a place to dump the body, eventually settling on a park, where he clumsily hid her in some bushes, Taiwanese police say.
Before he disposed of her belongings, authorities say Chan took Poon's iPhone, her digital camera and an HSBC ATM card. Prosecutors say he immediately withdrew the equivalent of about US$700, with plans to go on a shopping spree, but changed his mind and caught his flight back to Hong Kong. There he further withdrew the equivalent of about $2,400 from Poon's account, and deposited it to his credit card, according to authorities.
While authorities say Chan was enjoying Poon's money, her parents were growing increasingly frantic. Poon hadn't told them she was traveling with a boyfriend, but her mother found a copy of Chan's Taiwan Entry and Exit Permit at Poon's apartment, the court heard in April. On March 5, she filed a missing person report to police in Taiwan, and just over a week later they discovered Poon's now decomposing corpse in the Zhuwei park.
Chan was brought in for questioning by Hong Kong police, and he admitted to murdering Poon and hiding her body, prosecutors say.

Extradition woes

Chan had admitted to the crime, and he'd been caught spending Poon's money, according to authorities. But police could not prove that he had planned the alleged murder in Hong Kong, meaning authorities in the city had no jurisdiction over it.
Taiwanese prosecutors issued a warrant but without an extradition treaty, there was little chance of Chan being sent to Taiwan.
Hong Kong officials have described the lack of an extradition agreement with mainland China as a loophole, but a British official who worked on the agreement to hand over the city to Chinese control in 1997 said the building of a firewall with China's legal system was deliberate.
"The UK made a conscious decision to create a clear divide between the two systems so that the rule of law remains robust," former British foreign secretary Malcolm Rifkind wrote in June.
"The question of having a comprehensive arrangement for rendition, sending fugitives to mainland China, has been under discussion for more than 20 years, and of course got nowhere," former Hong Kong lawmaker Emily Lau told CNN. "And the reason, the main reason, is that Hong Kong and mainland China have two very different legal systems, and we cannot guarantee, and nobody can guarantee, that anyone sent to mainland China, would get a fair trial, because what they have there."
According to Washinton-based watchdog Freedom House, China lacks an independent judiciary and fails to protect the right to due process. The conviction rate in China has been widely estimated to be around 98%.
Demonstrations began over the extradition bill in April, and hundreds of thousands of people turned out to protest it on June 9. When the Hong Kong government pressed ahead, tens of thousands of protesters successfully blocked the city's legislature from holding a second reading, and in June, Lam agreed to suspend it, but not fully withdraw it.
By the time she did announce its withdrawal, in September, it was too late: the protest demands had sprawled and the unrest -- by then in its fourth month -- showed no sign of stopping.
As far as the Hong Kong legal system is concerned, now that he's left prison, Chan is a free man.
Last week -- after lobbying by lawmakers and religious figures -- Chan told the Hong Kong government he would hand himself over to Taiwanese authorities, willing to face justice on the island. This apparent solution was thrown into doubt, however, when Taipei raised concerns about accepting his surrender without full judicial cooperation from Hong Kong, including handing over evidence against Chan.
"The homicide case took place in Taiwan. The body of the deceased, key witnesses, exhibits and relevant evidence were all in Taiwan. Without doubt, Taiwan has jurisdiction over this offence," Hong Kong's government said Wednesday. "Now that Chan is willing to surrender, Taiwan should receive him, and initiate interrogation, evidence gathering and prosecution on him. Regarding the relevant evidence in Hong Kong, apart from those voluntarily brought with Chan, for other evidence, Hong Kong will, under the legal framework and following the procedures, provide all necessary assistance."
Poon's parents have called again and again for justice to be done, but there's not really anything more they can do. Lam has said over and over that the extradition bill is dead. Whether there is another way to send Chan to face justice for his alleged crime remains to be seen.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/23/asia/hong-kong-taiwan-murder-intl-hnk/index.html

2019-10-23 05:47:00Z
52780416261659

Selasa, 22 Oktober 2019

Graham and Fox News expert showed Trump a map to change his mind about Syria withdrawal - NBCNews.com

WASHINGTON — In the days after President Donald Trump paved the way for Turkey to invade Syria, several of his closest allies went to the White House — twice — to try to change his mind, according to four people familiar with the meetings.

Retired Gen. Jack Keane, a Fox News analyst, first walked the president through a map showing Syria, Turkey and Iraq on Oct. 8, pointing out the locations of oil fields in northern Syria that have been under the control of the United States and its Kurdish allies, two people familiar with the discussion said. That oil, they said Keane explained, would fall into Iran's hands if Trump withdrew all U.S. troops from the country.

Keane went through the same exercise with Trump again Oct. 14, this time with Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., at his side, according to four people familiar with the meeting. Keane displayed a map showing that almost three quarters of Syria's oil fields are in the parts of the country where U.S. troops are deployed, the people familiar with the meeting said. They said that Graham and Keane told the president that Iran is preparing to move toward the oil fields and could seize the air space above them once the U.S. leaves.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

The president seemed "resigned" to leaving a small number of American troops in northern Syria to keep control of the oil, according to a person who was present.

Before showing Trump the map, Keane and Graham joined the president to listen in on his phone calls with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Gen. Mazloum Kobani Abdi, the leader of the Kurdish forces aligned with the U.S., people familiar with the call said. Graham helped arrange the call with the Kurdish general.

Oct. 15, 201906:08

The episodes shed light on how the latest twist in Trump's orders of a Syria withdrawal — that the U.S. needs troops there to "secure the oil" — emerged. Trump's comments in recent days about the need for U.S. troops to secure oil fields in Syria have raised questions about where the idea came from and fueled widespread confusion about what the president's mission is for American forces deployed there.

Trump is raising the oil issue amid unrelenting pressure from fellow Republicans, and some members of his own administration, to reverse his decision to order a complete U.S. withdrawal from Syria.

Since Trump's phone call with Erdogan on Oct. 6 that precipitated his announcement of plans to withdraw all U.S. troops from Syria, his allies inside and outside the administration have been floating various proposals to try to contain the fallout both politically at home and logistically on the ground in Syria, current and former U.S. officials said. On Monday, the president delivered contradictory public statements about a plan that would keep some U.S. troops in northern Syria indefinitely to conduct counterterrorism missions and protect the oil fields.

"I don't want to leave any troops there," Trump told reporters. "I don't think it's necessary other than we secure the oil."

The president's comments came as the Pentagon was preparing orders for maintaining several hundred troops in northern Syria, according to a senior U.S. official.

Keane declined to comment, as did a spokesman for Graham.

The White House didn't respond to a request for comment.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

Oct. 22, 201902:44

On Oct. 7, the day before Keane, whom Trump had considered to be his defense secretary, first came to the White House to talk to him about Syria, he appeared on Fox News and described the president's decision on Syria as a "strategic blunder." His in-person presentation to Trump on Oct. 8 seemed to leave an impression on the president, according to two people familiar with it. One of them said Trump "responded favorably."

But it didn't seem to be enough to convince the president to reverse course. Keane returned to the White House on Oct. 14, when Graham also was there. They were both in the Oval Office among the roughly dozen people listening to Trump's phone calls with the Kurdish general and Erdogan.

Show him the maps

This month wasn't the first time Trump has been shown a map detailing economic assets to convince him not to follow through on ordering U.S. troops home, officials said.

Members of Trump's national security team and his allies outside the administration have regularly gone through that exercise with him since he took office, officials said.

In the first two years of the administration, current and former officials said Trump so frequently threatened to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq and even the Korean Peninsula that some of his advisers developed a system for talking him down from taking such steps. The effort included showing him visual materials like maps to walk through the reasons why an abrupt withdrawal would be detrimental to U.S. interests, officials said.

For Syria, the exercises focused on the oil and how it would fall into Iran's hands if the U.S. withdrew, officials said. Keane was among those who walked Trump through a Syria map showing oil fields after the president announced in December 2018 that he would withdraw all U.S. troops there. That announcement also followed a phone call between Trump and Erdogan.

On Afghanistan, the presentation to Trump included a map of the country's rare earth minerals, largely used in electronic devices, officials said.

The goal was to frame the argument in economic terms that Trump was more likely to respond than a purely military strategy, they said. With Syria, the prospect of economic leverage also dovetailed with Trump's inclination to block anything advantageous to Iran, officials said.

The focus on Iran in trying to convince Trump to keep a contingent of U.S. troops in northern Syria — rather than on potential action by Russia, which officials say is far more capable and likely to make moves to harness the oil — is in part because the president has appeared more likely to be persuaded by proposals aimed at countering Iran than Russia, according to one former U.S. official.

One defense official said while the emphasis on oil in Syria is intended to convince the president that the U.S. military presence is valuable, securing the oil fields is not a military strategy. U.S. troops will not actually be guarding the oil fields, the official said.

"Keeping troops at one or two locations near the oil fields would be extremely expensive and hard to re-supply them," the official said.

'Imminent invasion'

U.S. military officials acknowledged Monday that they don't know if troops in Syria are actually going to stay or for how long.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper said he and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recommended the initial pullback of U.S. troops in northern Syria because of "the imminent invasion by the Turks," a NATO ally.

Now, he said, the focus is on presenting options to Trump that address how to maintain the counter-ISIS operation after a U.S. withdrawal from northeast Syria, shore up defenses in Iraq and deny oil revenues to the Islamic State militant group and other adversaries.

Oct. 21, 201902:23

On Monday, Esper told reporters that a small contingent of U.S. troops currently working with Kurdish allies to secure the oil fields will only remain in the country until the full withdrawal of U.S. forces is complete in a matter of weeks.

The administration began withdrawing the 1,000 troops in northern Syria in recent days.

Esper said the U.S. troops that will remain for some weeks in towns near the oil fields are there to "deny access to those oil fields by ISIS and others who may benefit from those revenues that could be earned."

Trump has agreed to keep a small contingent of American forces in southern Syria as a deterrent to Iran.

Jim Jeffrey, the State Department's special representative on Syria, has advocated for keeping a couple hundred troops in northern Syria, according to two officials.

Administration officials, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, continue to lobby U.S. allies to take ISIS prisoners imprisoned in Syria who are citizens of their countries.

"This is all Trump damage control," one former official said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/military/graham-fox-news-star-showed-trump-map-change-his-mind-n1069901

2019-10-22 16:24:00Z
52780401824835

Syria's five-day "ceasefire" runs out today: Live updates - CNN International

US President Donald Trump Cabinet meeting lasted more than 70 mins.
US President Donald Trump Cabinet meeting lasted more than 70 mins.

President Donald Trump delivered a blistering and rambling monologue to the journalists he allowed into his Cabinet meeting for more than 70 minutes on Monday. His press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, later tweeted, "I hope we see honest reporting from today's mtg."

We can honestly tell you that Trump's remarks were highly dishonest. Here's some of his false claims on Syria:

"People have been trying to make this deal for years," Trump said of his ceasefire agreement with Turkey.

Facts FirstThe President's claim is baseless to the point of being nonsensical. The deal is a narrow agreement specifically tied to the Turkish offensive that followed Trump's decision to withdraw US troops from a Kurdish-held region of northern Syria, not an agreement that resolves long-standing regional disputes. Further, Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush never sought to give Turkey anything like the concessionary terms of Trump's deal.

You can read a longer fact check here.

Trump said American troops were initially supposed to be in Syria for a mere "30 days."

Facts FirstThere was never any specific timeline for the US military's involvement in Syria, much less a timeline of only 30 days.

"There was never a 30-day timetable on the US presence in Syria," said Syria expert Steven Heydemann, a professor of government and director of the Middle East Studies program at Smith College. "The previous administration, and officials serving in this administration, have never offered a fixed timetable for the US mission. Official statements have emphasized that the presence of US forces would be short, limited in scope, and small. But beyond general comments along those lines, there has been no statement indicating it would end after 30 days."

"We're bringing our troops back home. I got elected on bringing our soldiers back home," Trump said.

Facts FirstHe is not bringing the troops back home, at least not at the moment.

Trump has announced that "United States troops coming out of Syria will now redeploy and remain in the region to monitor the situation and prevent a repeat of 2014, when the neglected threat of ISIS raged across Syria and Iraq." He has also announced that 1,800 more troops would be deployed to Saudi Arabia.

Trump conceded at the Cabinet meeting that the soldiers will be "sent, initially, to different parts," but he claimed that they would "ultimately" return to the US.

Read CNN's full fact check here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/turkey-syria-10-22-2019/index.html

2019-10-22 11:55:00Z
52780401824835

Syria's five-day "ceasefire" runs out today: Live updates - CNN International

US President Donald Trump Cabinet meeting lasted more than 70 mins.
US President Donald Trump Cabinet meeting lasted more than 70 mins.

President Donald Trump delivered a blistering and rambling monologue to the journalists he allowed into his Cabinet meeting for more than 70 minutes on Monday. His press secretary, Stephanie Grisham, later tweeted, "I hope we see honest reporting from today's mtg."

We can honestly tell you that Trump's remarks were highly dishonest. Here's some of his false claims on Syria:

"People have been trying to make this deal for years," Trump said of his ceasefire agreement with Turkey.

Facts FirstThe President's claim is baseless to the point of being nonsensical. The deal is a narrow agreement specifically tied to the Turkish offensive that followed Trump's decision to withdraw US troops from a Kurdish-held region of northern Syria, not an agreement that resolves long-standing regional disputes. Further, Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush never sought to give Turkey anything like the concessionary terms of Trump's deal.

You can read a longer fact check here.

Trump said American troops were initially supposed to be in Syria for a mere "30 days."

Facts FirstThere was never any specific timeline for the US military's involvement in Syria, much less a timeline of only 30 days.

"There was never a 30-day timetable on the US presence in Syria," said Syria expert Steven Heydemann, a professor of government and director of the Middle East Studies program at Smith College. "The previous administration, and officials serving in this administration, have never offered a fixed timetable for the US mission. Official statements have emphasized that the presence of US forces would be short, limited in scope, and small. But beyond general comments along those lines, there has been no statement indicating it would end after 30 days."

"We're bringing our troops back home. I got elected on bringing our soldiers back home," Trump said.

Facts FirstHe is not bringing the troops back home, at least not at the moment.

Trump has announced that "United States troops coming out of Syria will now redeploy and remain in the region to monitor the situation and prevent a repeat of 2014, when the neglected threat of ISIS raged across Syria and Iraq." He has also announced that 1,800 more troops would be deployed to Saudi Arabia.

Trump conceded at the Cabinet meeting that the soldiers will be "sent, initially, to different parts," but he claimed that they would "ultimately" return to the US.

Read CNN's full fact check here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/turkey-syria-10-22-2019/index.html

2019-10-22 11:30:00Z
52780401824835

Boris Johnson attempts to push Brexit withdrawal bill through Parliament: Live updates - CNN International

We still don't know the answer to this question, because Speaker John Bercow blocked a vote on the UK Prime Minister's Brexit deal on Monday.

But we will get a sense of the level of support for the deal in Parliament today, when the first vote is held on the detailed legislation that turns it into law.

That vote will be on what is confusingly known as the bill's second reading. So which way will it go? CNN has attempted to estimate the level of support for Johnson's deal, based on information on how lawmakers voted on Saturday, their public statements, and other reports in other credible media sources.

For the deal: Johnson can count on the support of the 287 voting Conservative lawmakers, including 28 hardline Brexiteers who never voted for his predecessor's deal. He also has the support of 20 independent Conservatives, at least nine Labour MPs, and at least four independents -- including one, John Woodcock, who appears to have changed his mind. That takes him to 320 -- but in any vote, two MPs from this bloc would be nominated as tellers (counters of the votes), so that means he has 318 actual votes behind him.

Against the deal: Opposing Johnson are 231 Labour MPs, 35 members of the Scottish National Party, 19 Liberal Democrats, 10 Democratic Unionist Party MPs, five members of The Independent Group, 4 Welsh nationalists, three independent Conservatives and one Green MP. Another seven independent MPs would be likely to vote against the deal. That's a total of 315. Remove two tellers and you get a final tally of 313.

Three Labour MPs and one independent Northern Ireland unionist remain uncommitted, but are leaning towards supporting the deal.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://edition.cnn.com/uk/live-news/brexit-boris-johnson-parliament-tuesday-dle-intl/index.html

2019-10-22 09:52:00Z
CBMiYGh0dHBzOi8vZWRpdGlvbi5jbm4uY29tL3VrL2xpdmUtbmV3cy9icmV4aXQtYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1wYXJsaWFtZW50LXR1ZXNkYXktZGxlLWludGwvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBYGh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmNubi5jb20vY25uL3VrL2xpdmUtbmV3cy9icmV4aXQtYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1wYXJsaWFtZW50LXR1ZXNkYXktZGxlLWludGwvaW5kZXguaHRtbA