Minggu, 20 Oktober 2019

Boris Johnson stokes new Brexit battle with letter asking E.U. for delay — and another arguing against it - NBC News

LONDON — Just days after the release of a letter in which President Donald Trump urged his Turkish counterpart not to be a “tough guy” or a “fool,” another correspondence from a world leader has set off a public firestorm.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sent European leaders an unsigned letter late Saturday, fulfilling his legal obligation to request a Brexit extension. But he also sent another note saying he was opposed to further delay, which he claimed would be "deeply corrosive."

Johnson once vowed he would rather be “dead in a ditch” than ask for an extension to the U.K.’s current Oct. 31 deadline to leave the European Union, but lawmakers in Parliament forced his hand.

So after a day of yet more Brexit drama — in which Johnson was denied a potentially decisive vote on his deal to lead Britain out of the bloc and instead forced to request the delay — the prime minister sent not one but three letters to Brussels.

First, a brief cover note from Britain's E.U. envoy explaining the government was simply complying with the law; second, an unsigned photocopy of the text that the law forced him to write; and a third letter in which Johnson outlined his opposition to an extension.

Further delay "would damage the interests of the U.K. and our E.U. partners, and the relationship between us," Johnson said. “We must bring this process to a conclusion.”

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

After Saturday's votes a defiant Johnson said he was not "daunted or dismayed" by the result.JESSICA TAYLOR / AFP - Getty Images

Despite the prime minister’s insistence on expressing his personal opposition to the idea, E.U. leaders acknowledged that they had received the U.K.’s extension request and would consider it.

Johnson’s move nonetheless drew fierce criticism, with the letters becoming just the latest battle in an existential struggle that has gripped the country since it voted to leave the bloc in a June 2016 referendum.

Oct. 19, 201901:57

Johnson could face legal challenges from opponents who feel that sending the second letter was done to frustrate Parliament.

The opposition Labour Party's Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer said Sunday that the prime minister "is being childlike." Finance spokesman John McDonnell said he was "treating Parliament and the Courts with contempt."

David Lammy, a Labour lawmaker and prominent advocate of staying in the E.U., said the gambit was “straight out of the Trump rulebook.”

The prime minister has drawn frequent comparisons to Trump for his unconventional style, hardline policies and uncompromising approach.

Johnson has repeatedly accused his opponents of “surrender” to the E.U. by forcing further delay, leading to criticism that he is stoking tensions amid the increasingly febrile atmosphere in the country.

Lawmakers sought the latest delay Saturday to buy more time to scrutinize and possibly tweak Johnson’s plans.

They also want to avoid the risk of the U.K. crashing out of the E.U. without a deal at all, an extreme scenario that forecasts suggest could cause economic pain, food shortages and even civil unrest.

Despite Saturday’s setbacks, Johnson has vowed to bring his divorce deal for a vote again next week.

If he can secure enough support, the government will attempt to rush it into law and render any extension beyond Oct. 31 unnecessary.

But the delay has opened the door to other possibilities, including an election or second referendum.

Perhaps all that is clear is that the division and turmoil that have characterised the Brexit process are alive and well.

Alexander Smith contributed.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/boris-johnson-stokes-new-brexit-battle-letter-asking-e-u-n1069091

2019-10-20 08:37:00Z
52780406083772

'Hong Kong is my home': Protesters defy police, set up roadblocks - Aljazeera.com

Hong Kong police have fired tear gas at protesters as thousands staged a march through the Kowloon district, ignoring a police ban on the rally and setting up barricades.

Police inside the Tsim Sha Tsui police station fired volleys of tear gas and used a loudspeaker on Sunday to call on protesters in the street to disperse.

Protest leaders at the front of the procession carried a black banner with the slogan, "Five main demands, not one less" as they pressed their calls for accountability and political rights.

The protesters tore up paving stones from the pavement and scattered them on the road, commandeered plastic safety barriers and unscrewed metal railings to form makeshift roadblocks.

Hong Kong has been battered by months of often massive and violent protests over concerns Beijing is tightening its grip on the city, the worst political crisis since Britain handed the city back to China in 1997. 

{articleGUID}

The crisis in the Chinese-ruled city also poses the biggest popular challenge to China's President Xi Jinping since he took power. Beijing has denied eroding Hong Kong's freedoms and Xi has vowed to crush any attempt to "split" China.

The unrest was sparked by a bill that would have allowed the extradition of accused individuals to mainland China for trial in Communist Party-controlled courts. It has since widened into a pro-democracy movement.

Matthew Lee, a university student, said he was determined to keep protesting even after five months.

"I can see some people want to give up but I don't want to do this because Hong Kong is my home, we want to protect this place, protect Hong Kong," he said.

Many of the movement's supporters wore masks in defiance of a recently introduced ban on face coverings at public gatherings and volunteers handed more out to the crowd.

Organisers said they wanted to use their right to protest, as guaranteed by the city's constitution, despite the risk of arrest.

"We're using peaceful, rational, nonviolent way to voice our demands," Figo Chan, vice convener of the Civil Human Rights Front, told reporters.

"We're not afraid of being arrested. What I'm most scared of is everyone giving up on our principles."

The group has organised some of the movement's biggest protest marches. One of its leaders, Jimmy Sham, was attacked on Wednesday by assailants wielding hammers.

On Saturday, police arrested a 22-year-old man on suspicion of stabbing a teenage activist distributing leaflets near a Lennon Wall plastered with pro-democracy messages.

Local media images showed the young activist had been severely injured in the afternoon incident in northeastern Tai Po district.

A witness told local broadcaster RTHK the assailant shouted afterwards that Hong Kong is "a part of China" and other pro-Beijing messages. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/kong-home-protesters-defy-police-set-roadblocks-191020081422473.html

2019-10-20 08:47:00Z
52780413434652

US is out of the picture in Syria-Turkey crisis. Putin now owns this mess - CNN

Only a few hours later, airstrikes and artillery fire could be felt in northern Syria as the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces accused Ankara and its proxies of severe ceasefire violations.
The mood both in Washington and in the Middle East is that the ceasefire is not the real deal. It expires on Tuesday, October 22, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Turkish counterpart Recip Tayyip Erdogan will meet in Sochi to discuss the future of Syria. It seems pretty clear: that's when the world will find out that the real deal will be for the future of this volatile region.

Putin's leadership role

It's also clear that the future will, to a large extent, be determined by the Russian President. With Trump's abandonment of the Kurds, America's main allies in the fight against ISIS, and his de facto green lighting of Turkey's invasion of northern Syria, the White House maneuvered itself out of the Syria equation. For better or worse, Putin now owns the military and political mess unfolding there.
Turkey's assault in Syria is a boon for Erdogan. Here's why
But unlike the Trump administration's hectic efforts at last-minute diplomacy to try to end the bloodshed it helped unleash, Putin at least seemed like a man with a plan.
Russia immediately started negotiations with the Kurds and Moscow's main ally, the Assad government, quickly reaching a deal to allow the Syrian military into Kurdish-held areas where Damascus has not had a presence for years in order to stave off the Turkish-led offensive. Moscow also quickly deployed its own military as a buffer to keep the Turks and their forces apart from the Kurds and Syrian government troops.
The move caused a good deal of chest thumping among Putin's military: "When the Russian flag appears, combat stops -- neither Turks nor Kurds want to harm us, so fighting stops thanks to our work," a Russian army officer, Safar Safarov, was quoted as saying by Tass state news agency, as the country's military police units began patrolling Manbij.

Russia's high-risk game

Turkish-backed Syrian rebel fighters head to an area near the Syrian-Turkish border north of Aleppo on October 8, 2019.
With Russia's new role as the undisputed lead nation also come grave risks. The situation in northeastern Syria is more than volatile. The Turks have made clear they will not allow a Kurdish military presence near their border. But Ankara's ground force consists largely of Syrian rebel groups, many of them hardline Islamists whom the Kurds fear could unleash a campaign of ethnic cleansing against minorities in this diverse region.
To add to all this, Syrian government forces and the rebels allied with Ankara also have an ax to grind with one another after all the atrocities committed during the devastating eight-year civil war.
Moscow seems to understand the dangerous situation it has been propelled into with its new leadership role.
"We tried to draw attention for many years to the explosive policies of the USA and the coalition, headed for the collapse of Syria and the creation of quasi-state formations on the eastern bank of the Euphrates, pushing Kurds to separatism and confrontation with Arab tribes," Russia's foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said Wednesday as he addressed heads of security services.
Russian military police are now patrolling the line between Syrian and Turkish forces
The Kremlin is gravely concerned that Russians who fought with ISIS and other rebels groups could return to their homeland and cause instability there. From the moment Turkey launched its offensive in Northern Syria the Kremlin voiced extreme doubts about Turkey's ability to keep a lid on the thousands of ISIS prisoners and their relatives that the Kurds had been guarding.
"There are areas in northern Syria where ISIS militants are concentrated and until recently, they were guarded by the Kurdish military. The Turkish army entered these areas and the Kurds left... Now [ISIS fighters] can simply run away and I am not sure that the Turkish army can -- and how fast -- get this under control," Putin said last week at The Commonwealth of Independent States forum in Ashgabat.
Russia faced a sustained insurgency in Chechnya in the 1990s and prosecuted a bloody war there for several years. The last thing Vladimir Putin wants is for former Russian ISIS members to go back to the Caucasus region, possibly leading to the return of instability. At that same forum in Turkmenistan, Putin warned other leaders of the region to brace for the situation. "We are talking about hundreds of militants there, thousands when it comes to CIS countries. This is a real threat to us. How and where will they head?" Putin said.
"We need to understand this and mobilize the resources of our special services to cut short this emerging new threat," Putin added.

All Syrian roads lead to Moscow

But despite all the dangers facing Putin's high-stakes Syria gambit the Russian leader still seems to be in a position to possibly prevent the situation from blowing up even more than it already has.
Putin is on a victory lap of the Middle East
Russia has a devastating track record in the Syrian conflict. Human rights groups have accused Moscow of committing war crimes in its campaign to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The US says Moscow has systematically bombed civilian infrastructure, especially hospitals, and aided Assad in covering up alleged chemical weapons use by the Syrian military. Russian vehemently denies all these allegations.
And despite many US and European officials lamenting Moscow's alleged lies and deception, pretty much all the countries and parties involved in the Syrian crisis seem to agree that Moscow is more reliable than Washington in this crisis.
NATO ally Turkey has been working with the Russians for years, despite the fact they back opposing factions in the Syrian civil war. Even arch-enemies Israel and Iran seem to agree that the road to making sure their interests are met runs through Moscow.
And when the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces -- which were backed by the US and lost nearly 11,000 fighters in the war against ISIS -- found out they'd been dumped by Trump and left to be invaded by Erdogan's proxy force, they too went straight to the Russians because guess what: Moscow has been working with and talking to the SDF for years as well.
So it was never going to be the Trump White House that could try and broker a solution to the messy situation in northeastern Syria. If there will be deal it will be reached next Tuesday in Sochi by Putin and Erdogan -- on their terms.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/20/middleeast/putin-now-owns-this-mess-intl/index.html

2019-10-20 05:16:00Z
52780401824835

Brexit vote postponed: Here's what could happen now - CNBC

Despite being billed as "Super Saturday," a special parliamentary session in the House of Commons offered little detail on when, or even if, Britain will finally exit the European Union.

U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson was thwarted by a cross-party group of politicians who voted to postpone the "meaningful vote" on his new divorce deal and force him to ask Brussels for an extension to the current Oct. 31 Brexit deadline.

The developments in Parliament set up a complicated week with just 11 days left until the U.K. is still due to leave the world's largest trading bloc.

Will there be a deadline delay?

Johnson grudgingly asked for an extension to the deadline late on Saturday night, but EU leaders don't necessarily have to accept it. Some have ruled out giving Britain more time, piling pressure on U.K. lawmakers to accept the current deal. But it's unlikely they would want a no-deal scenario and the potential economic hit it could mean for both sides of the English Channel.

Brussels could offer a technical extension of a few weeks in the hope of passing the agreement they recently thrashed out with Johnson. Or they could accept what Johnson was obliged to ask for on Saturday night and push the date back to January 31, opening the door to a U.K. general election — which itself could lead to a renegotiation or a second referendum.

They could also push it out until June 2020 when the next cycle of EU budgets begins, but this is seen as unlikely with the Brexit fatigue that has set in across the whole of Europe.

EU leaders are expected to take their time with a response, but it could come as early as Monday.

When will the vote now happen?

The U.K. government is keen to have its "meaningful vote" on Monday, but this could be rejected by the house speaker as it's not parliamentary convention to repeatedly ask the same questions to politicians.

Instead, the government could present the full Withdrawal Agreement Bill early this week and slowly to try to pass it through both chambers — the House of Commons and the House of Lords. This will involve days of debate, many attempts to amend the bill and a selection of different votes as the week progresses. A crunch, decisive question to lawmakers would then come later in the week or be pushed back even further.

Could we still have no deal?

Yes. The cross-party amendment that was backed on Saturday tried to reduce the odds of a no deal, but it could still happen. The EU could say no to an extension. The passage of the bill could also be held up and not make it through Parliament in the time available.

Could there still be a second referendum?

Yes. Some MPs (Members of Parliament) will likely try to amend the bill this week to make sure there is a "confirmatory" referendum. If a lengthy extension is granted by the EU then nothing is ruled out. Several opposition parties would campaign to offer a so-called People's Vote in the event of a general election, or could promise to abandon Brexit altogether.

JUSTIN TALLIS | AFP | Getty Images

What are the experts saying?

Capital Economics called Saturday's vote "a decent result for the economy and the pound as it makes a no deal Brexit on 31st October even less likely." But it added that "it does extend the uncertainty that has been hampering growth for a least a bit longer."

Analysts at Deutsche Bank said "the outlook for a Brexit resolution remains constructive," explaining that the makeup of the voting on Saturday actually meant that Johnson could receive enough backing for his deal at a later date.

The bank also said it would "retain our constructive outlook on the U.K., and long sterling and short U.K. real yield recommendations."

If Brexit already seems complicated, it might be about to get a whole lot more so.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/20/brexit-vote-postponed-heres-what-could-happen-now.html

2019-10-20 08:31:15Z
52780406083772

Hong Kong Protesters Rally Despite Attacks and Police Ban - The New York Times

Video
Video player loading
As violence escalates between demonstrators and the police in Hong Kong, protesters have started writing “last letters” to their loved ones, in case they don’t return. These notes chronicle the mental and emotional state of frontliners coming to terms with risking death for their beliefs.CreditCreditOrlando de Guzman/The New York Times

HONG KONG — The police in Hong Kong fired tear gas and protesters lit fires in a bank branch and subway entrances on Sunday, as tens of thousands of people marched despite an official ban and attacks on the march promoters.

The demonstration, which began peacefully before outbursts of vandalism and clashes between the police and protesters, was a display of continuing support for the movement despite increasing restrictions and official condemnation.

Demonstrators gathered in Tsim Sha Tsui, a crowded commercial district on the southern tip of the Kowloon Peninsula, to march to West Kowloon, site of an arts district and a high-speed rail station that links the city to mainland China.

They assembled along a promenade beside Victoria Harbor and chanted slogans while the protest anthem “Glory to Hong Kong” was played.

The Hong Kong subway system, which has sustained widespread vandalism from protesters in recent weeks, closed stations near the march route.

Protesters broke windows in multiple stations on Sunday and painted graffiti over the protective barriers installed around the entryways. They also set fire to an entrance to the Mong Kok subway station and a Bank of China branch.

Around 3:15 p.m., the police fired tear gas at protesters near the Tsim Sha Tsui Police Station. Shortly after that, some protesters threw several firebombs into the station, briefly setting a tree alight.

Image
CreditLam Yik Fei for The New York Times

The Civil Human Rights Front, the organizer of large, peaceful marches this summer they estimate were attended by up to two million people, applied to host the event Sunday. But the police rejected the application, saying that such demonstrations have often been hijacked by vandalism and violence.

After that denial, the Civil Human Rights Front backed out of hosting the march, but one of its leaders, Figo Chan, and other pro-democracy figures called on people to turn out anyway.

“I’m not afraid of arrest, of jail, of getting beaten up or gashed,” Mr. Chan said Sunday before the march. “But I hope people understand that to fight for democracy, freedom and justice, we must sacrifice. We use peaceful, rational and nonviolent means to express our demands. We are not afraid of arrest. What I fear most is everyone giving up on our principles.”

Another Civil Human Rights Front leader, Jimmy Sham, was attacked by men with hammers on Tuesday in Kowloon. Mr. Sham was released from a hospital, but was continuing to receive treatment and not able to attend the march, the group said.

On Saturday evening, a 19-year-old man distributing fliers to call on people to join the march was assaulted near a subway station in northern Hong Kong. He was stabbed in the neck and the abdomen, and is hospitalized in serious condition, the government said.

A 22-year-old man was arrested in the attack. The local news media quoted witnesses who said the attacker shouted that Hong Kong is a part of China, and that protesters were damaging the city.

Chinese officials and the state news media have denounced the protests as a separatist movement. Some Hong Kong marchers carried Catalan flags on Sunday to show solidarity with the separatist movement in Spain. But while some protesters have called for Hong Kong’s independence from China, it is not a focus of the Hong Kong demonstrators nor one of their official demands.

The protests began over legislation, since withdrawn, that would have allowed extraditions to mainland China from Hong Kong. Hong Kong’s top leader, Chief Executive Carrie Lam, said in September that the government would withdraw the proposal, but public anger with the authorities has remained high.

The marchers on Sunday reiterated other longstanding demands, including an independent investigation of the police, amnesty for arrested protesters and the introduction of direct elections for the chief executive and legislature.

The organizers have also raised two newer demands: a reorganization of the police department and the scrapping of a ban on face masks.

Mrs. Lam used emergency powers this month to introduce the mask law. The move set off a wave of fresh protests and clashes with the police.

“I want to make best use of every chance to come out,” said Anne Chin, 32, a clerk who joined the march. “After the mask ban, we don’t know when the government will invoke the Emergency Regulations Ordinance again and implement laws that may further muzzle Hong Kong people’s rights.”

Demonstrators on Sunday also expressed support for Hong Kong’s ethnic minority communities. Some reports said Mr. Sham’s attackers were paid South Asian men, and people in the protest movement said they were worried that could lead to retaliatory attacks.

Some demonstrators stood outside the Kowloon Mosque and Islamic Center with signs calling on others to respect the building. “Be nice to religion,” one sign read. At Chungking Mansions, a building in Tsim Sha Tsui that holds several South Asian-run restaurants and shops, volunteers handed out bottled water to demonstrators.

Kamil Kaka, who is from southern India and has lived in Hong Kong for more than a decade, said he was a little worried that protesters could target South Asians like him.

But Mr. Kaka, 32, said he thought Hong Kong people should have a right to protest, as he stood on a side street in Tsim Sha Tsui, watching demonstrators stream down the district’s main thoroughfare.

”People are fighting for their freedom,” Mr. Kaka said.

Protesters said they were determined to show that the movement still enjoyed wide support, even if the attendance had been dampened by police bans and recent attacks. Jason Wong, a 26-year-old office worker, brought to the march 60-foot-long black banners signed beforehand by residents in each of the city’s 18 districts with colorful markers, an effort aided by a team of volunteers.

“The government has posed many restrictions and tried to oppress the Hong Kong people but we cannot show weakness,” he said. “We need to show the world that we have many people calling for common demands, even if not everyone dares to come out.”

Ezra Cheung, Elaine Yu, Javier Hernández and Tiffany May contributed reporting.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/20/world/asia/hong-kong-protests.html

2019-10-20 04:03:00Z
52780413434652

Sabtu, 19 Oktober 2019

Parliament votes to withhold approval of Brexit deal, postponing Boris Johnson’s moment of reckoning - The Washington Post

Parliament members voted Oct. 19 to withhold support for Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal until all the supporting legislation has passed.

The British Parliament held an extraordinary Saturday session to debate Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal. Here’s what we know so far:

● Lawmakers voted to withhold support for Johnson’s deal until all supporting legislation has passed.

● A British law requires the prime minister to request a Brexit delay if a deal is not approved by Oct. 19, but Johnson said, “I will not negotiate a delay with the E.U. And neither does the law compel me to do so.”

● Anti-Brexit protesters are marching through the streets of London. Some Brexit-supporting lawmakers reported requiring police escort.

///////

LONDON — British lawmakers voted Saturday to withhold support for Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s new Brexit deal, scuppering his hopes to finalize Brexit on an extraordinary “Super Saturday” but not dealing a fatal blow to the withdrawal agreement he negotiated in Brussels.

The successful amendment, from the Conservative Party rebel Oliver Letwin, was designed to box Johnson in — so he cannot force Britain to leave the European Union until lawmakers have scrutinized and passed all necessary legislation for an orderly exit.

Johnson’s allies branded it a sneaky attempt by an obstreperous Parliament to defy the will of the people and gum up the Brexit trajectory.

The vote was close: 322 in favor and 306 against.

It was an anti-climactic conclusion to a day that saw lawmakers gather on a Saturday for the first time in 37 years, since when Britain fought in the Falklands.

Johnson responded to the parliamentary beatdown with emphatic finger-jabbing. The prime minister insisted, “I’m not daunted or dismayed by this particular result.” He vowed he would “not negotiate” a delay with the E.U. — which doesn’t mean he won’t ask for one.

Johnson warned the House of Commons that “further delay would be bad for this country, bad for our European Union and bad for democracy.”

Jessica Taylor/UK Parliament

Reuters

“I’m not daunted or dismayed by this particular result,” Prime Minister Boris Johnson said.

The prime minister said he would seek approval of his Brexit deal in the coming week.

But according to legislation passed last month, if a deal has not been approved by 11 p.m. local time on Oct. 19, Johnson is required to formally seek a three-month extension beyond the Oct. 31 Brexit deadline, potentially pushing any exit into early 2020.

How — or when or if — Johnson requests a delay is now an unanswered question.

The leader of the opposition Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, said he hoped Johnson did not believe “he’s above the law” and warned that the prime minister would find himself in court if he didn’t send a letter requesting an extension.

European leaders are sick and tired of Brexit talks, but almost certain to agree to an extension. Most E.U. policymakers already worried it would be impossible to get all the pieces of the split in place by the end of October. So a request to delay would be pushing on an unlocked door.

“If Johnson asks the European Union to grant an extension, it should be approved, since a modified agreement on the terms of withdrawal has been reached,” Latvian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkevics told Latvia’s LETA news agency after Saturday’s vote. “It is in everyone’s interest that the Brexit is arranged in an orderly manner.”

European leaders would probably move quickly to hit the Brexit pause button, although they have not yet decided whether they would need to meet in person to do so.

In his remarks on Saturday, Johnson emphasized that the Brexit debate — which he launched as a leader of the 2016 referendum campaign — has taken a toll.

“Friendships have been strained, families divided, and the attention of this house consumed by a single issue that has at times felt incapable of resolution,” he said.

The prime minister called his deal “a new and better way forward” for Britain and Europe.

The British leader will need to win 320 votes in Parliament to pass his Brexit deal. Number crunchers on Saturday morning said it was too tight to call, but could see pathways for him to win the support he needs.

[How Boris Johnson could pass his Brexit deal — and who could stand in the way]

Simon Dawson

Reuters

E.U. supporters march as Parliament debates Brexit.

Underscoring how the country remains deeply divided on Brexit, thousands of protesters spilled into London from across the county to demand a second referendum. 

Some Brexit-supporting lawmakers reported that they required police escort to get home.

“Why do the so called ‘People’s Vote’ protesters think it’s ok to abuse, intimidate and scream in the face of someone they don’t agree with,” tweeted cabinet member Andrea Leadsom. “So frightening, and so grateful to the police.”

The demonstrations, though, were largely peaceful.

Lawyer Saira Ramadan, 36, was there with her 7-year-old son. She said it was “our last real opportunity to make our voices heard as publicly as possible, and in large numbers.”

Asked about the claim that people are exhausted by Brexit, she said, “It would be disingenuous of me to suggest that there isn’t a feeling of Brexit fatigue... but that’s not to say that should be a reason for those of us who feel strongly enough to take it lying down and give up because we want it done.”

For more than a year, polls have shown that if there were a countrywide “do over vote,” Britons would, by a narrow margin, opt to stay in the E.U.

Polling firm YouGov reported that 30 percent of Britons favor Johnson’s deal, 17 percent want to get out without a deal to manage the transition and 38 percent want to remain in the E.U., with the final 15 percent unsure.

Johnson swatted away calls for a second referendum and continued to press lawmakers to get Britain out by the end of October, as he has promised many times, “do or die.”

[U.K. and E.U. approve new Brexit deal, setting up potentially close vote in U.K. Parliament]

On the floor of the chamber, Johnson said Britain has long had a divided heart over Europe. It is skeptical, dubious and halfhearted about Europe’s grand projects, for further integration, for more federalism on the continent, for a Europe-wide defense pact, for a unified economic policy.

“We are skeptical about European integration,” he said, “But passionate about Europe.”

Corbyn said lawmakers should reject Johnson’s deal. 

“I also totally understand the frustration and the fatigue across the country and in this House,” Corbyn said. “But we simply can’t vote for a deal that is even worse than the one the House voted to reject three times.”

One challenge for the prime minister: there has been scant time to scrutinize the Brexit deal Johnson struck with the E.U., which could be to his liking.

Even some friendly lawmakers who support Brexit have complained they want to read the government’s own economic analysis of the cost of Johnson’s deal before they vote on it.

“His strategy has been the same as Theresa May’s strategy,” said Simon Usherwood, a professor of politics at the University of Surrey. “Present a deal, and then bounce, bounce, bounce it straight through. Before you know it, you’ve agreed something, and don’t worry about the details.”

Uk Parliament

Via Reuters

Speaker John Bercow speaks during the Brexit debate on Saturday.

May presented her withdrawal agreement to Parliament three times — and three times she was rejected.

On Saturday, now a backbencher, May rose to speak in the chamber and confessed a sense of deja vu. But she offered full-throated support for Johnson. If Parliament doesn’t back the deal, May said, “it is guilty of the most egregious con trick on the British people.” 

Her voice rising with passion, May said, “If you don’t want no deal you have to vote for a deal. Businesses are crying out for certainty. People want certainty in their lives.”

Johnson — who has campaigned under the banner of “Get Brexit Done” — could have another factor working in his favor: “Brexhaustion.” In a sign of the times, Sky News on Friday launched its own completely Brexit-free news channel, hoping there is a market for people who want a break from Brexit but not the news.

Johnson’s new Brexit deal offers a more distant relationship with the E.U. than the agreement struck by his predecessor. However, his plan would see Northern Ireland stay largely aligned to the E.U., even though it would leave the block with the rest of the U.K.

[What is happening with Brexit now? Boris Johnson’s plans for the Irish border and the E.U. explained.]

The Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party said the deal was not in the province’s “long-term interests.” Its 10 lawmakers are expected to vote against the deal on Saturday.

“It was once said that no British prime minister could ever agree to such terms,” DUP lawmaker Nigel Dodds said in Parliament. “Will he now abide by that and reconsider the fact that we must leave as one nation together?”

John Major and Tony Blair said in videos published for the People’s Vote campaign that Johnson’s deal risked derailing peace in Northern Ireland. The two former prime ministers, who both backed “remain” in the E.U. referendum, played important roles in the Good Friday Agreement, the accord that helped to usher in peace in Northern Ireland after decades of sectarian violence.

“It is a shame and an outrage frankly that Northern Ireland is treated like some disposable inconvenience to be bartered away,” said Blair.

Over the past 48 hours, there has been much wheeling and dealing and arm twisting. It’s hard to know what methods of persuasion, if any, were used in hopes of winning support. There was speculation that Johnson could offer the 21 lawmakers he expelled from his party last month a way back in if they voted to support his deal.

[A second Brexit vote once seemed impossible. Now, perhaps not.]

He also offered new pledges on Friday night to protect workers’ rights, which was seen as an attempt to woo more Labour lawmakers, especially those who are either Brexiteers or who represent Brexit-backing constituencies.

Labour’s Corbyn called those pledges “empty promises.”

This deal, Corbyn said, would “absolutely inevitably lead to a Trump trade deal, forcing the U.K. to diverge from the highest standards and expose our families once again to chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef.”

In an opinion piece in the Guardian newspaper, Melanie Onn, a Labour lawmaker from Grimsby, a pro-Brexit town populated by “Labour-leavers,” implored her colleagues “to use this unique chance to help us move on.” 

“The risk of letting this final shot at a deal slip through our fingers is too great,” she wrote, in a piece authored with a Conservative Party lawmaker.

Johnson is also hoping to bring on side the 28 hard line Brexiteers from his party who have previously been resistant to a Brexit deal. That group said Saturday morning that it had advised its members to vote for Johnson’s agreement.

Andrea Jenkyns, a Conservative lawmaker who never once voted for May’s deal, tweeted: “After much consideration, I have decided to back @BorisJohnson deal. Obviously I would prefer No-Deal but I believe we are in real danger of losing Brexit with the Remain shenanigans and the stakes are dangerously high at the moment.”

Michael Birnbaum in Brussels contributed to this report.

Isabel Infantes

Afp Via Getty Images

British lawmakers gather Saturday for a historic vote on Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Brexit deal, a decision that could see Britain leave the European Union this month or plunge the country into fresh uncertainty.

Read more

U.K. and E.U. approve new Brexit deal, setting up potentially close vote in U.K. Parliament

What is happening with Brexit now? Boris Johnson’s plans for the Irish border and the E.U. explained.

The ‘rebel alliance’ teamed up to thwart Boris Johnson’s plans. Can it stay united to steer Brexit?

In or out? Labour Party remains tortuously conflicted over Brexit and leader Jeremy Corbyn.

Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/boris-johnson-faces-historic-brexit-vote-in-parliament/2019/10/19/dba7cc70-f1a8-11e9-bb7e-d2026ee0c199_story.html

2019-10-19 15:45:00Z
52780406083772

Brexit vote derailed at last minute by rebel lawmakers; Boris Johnson pledges not to negotiate a delay - Fox News

A crucial vote on U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal was torpedoed on Saturday by a last-ditch bid by anti-Brexit MPs to derail it hours before lawmakers were due to cast their votes -- as thousands protested outside Parliament.

An amendment passed 322-306 that would require Johnson to apply for a delay to Britain's Oct. 31 departure from the bloc if the deal passed, something that Johnson said he would not do.

BREXIT BREAKTHROUGH? BORIS JOHNSON AGREES 'GREAT NEW DEAL' WITH EU

The rare Saturday session of Parliament - dubbed "Super Saturday" - was surrounded with both drama and a cloud of unknowns ahead of the vote expected late in the day, and comes just days after Johnson had secured a new withdrawal agreement with European leaders during the week, ahead of Britain’s scheduled departure from the bloc at the end of the month.

Lawmakers on both sides of the issue had warned of the danger of leaving without a deal, and Johnson had hailed the agreement as one that would satisfy hardline Brexiteers while making sure that the U.K. did not crash out of the bloc. It would have also allowed the U.K. to leave at Oct. 31.

Johnson is required to send a letter to the E.U. tonight requesting another delay under a law called the Benn Act. If his deal would have passed it would have nullified the Benn Act. But on Saturday, Johnson issued a defiant warning that he would not seek a delay -- although he did not say specifically he would not send the letter.

An effigy of Dominic Cummings advisor to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, holds an effigy of Prime Minister Johnson, right, during a protest march in London, Saturday, Oct. 19, 2019. 

An effigy of Dominic Cummings advisor to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, holds an effigy of Prime Minister Johnson, right, during a protest march in London, Saturday, Oct. 19, 2019.  (PA via AP)

"I will not negotiate a delay with the E.U. and neither does the law compel me to do so," he said, adding that the government would introduce the legislation next week to get his deal again over the line.

As lawmakers debated the measure, thousands of mostly anti-Brexit protesters marched through the streets of London. Many of them were calling for a second referendum -- something that those opposed to Brexit have been calling for since shortly after the first referendum in 2016, where 52 percent of voters chose to leave.

While polls show Johnson’s Conservative Party leading comfortably in the polls, there is a strong alliance of anti-Brexit parties in Parliament, and polls suggest that the public is still mostly split down the middle on Britain’s departure from the E.U.

Supporters of the amendment that passed, put forward by independent (and former Tory) MP Oliver Letwin, said it will remove the risk that the U.K. could still fall out of the bloc by mistake if there was a problem getting through Parliament the formal legislation needed to implement the deal.

But it requires Johnson, who has repeatedly promised that Britain would leave the E.U. on Oct. 31., to request a delay to the departure date. European leaders have said that there would be no further delays now that there is a deal on the table.

"I want us to finish this off and speak about the future," French President Emmanuel Macron said on Friday. "The Oct. 31 date must be respected. I don't believe new delays should be granted."

BORIS JOHNSON AIDE DENIES PRIME MINISTER COFFEE IN DISPOSABLE CUP

A demonstrator carries his dog, draped in EU flag, during anti-Brexit protest in London, Saturday, Oct. 19, 2019. 

A demonstrator carries his dog, draped in EU flag, during anti-Brexit protest in London, Saturday, Oct. 19, 2019.  (AP)

Even without the amendment, getting the deal passed is a daunting task for Johnson. His party holds only 288 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons, so will require support from pro-Brexit MPs in other parties -- while limiting defections within his own.

It was a task that evaded former Prime Minister Theresa May, who failed to get her own deal through on three separate occasions before she resigned in the summer.

Johnson’s deal differs from the May’s deal on the crucial aspect that it abandons the controversial backstop proposal that would have seen the U.K. kept in a customs union until a formal trade deal was made. The backstop was made to prevent a hard border between Northern Ireland (which is part of the U.K.) and Ireland -- which is remaining within the E.U.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

But in Johnson’s deal a special status is created for Northern Ireland which allows it to keep an open border with Ireland but while keeping unity with the rest of the U.K.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/world/brexit-delay-vote-derailed

2019-10-19 13:44:54Z
52780406083772