Jumat, 20 September 2019

As Narendra Modi Heads to U.S., Controversy Follows Him - The New York Times

MUMBAI, India — As Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India prepares for a big trip to the United States, human rights groups and three Nobel Peace Prize winners have criticized the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for its plan to bestow a prestigious award upon Mr. Modi next week during his visit.

The Nobel laureates sent a letter to the Gates Foundation stating that under Mr. Modi’s leadership, “India has descended into dangerous and deadly chaos that has consistently undermined human rights, democracy.’’

“This is particularly troubling to us as the stated mission of your foundation is to preserve life and fight inequity,” said the letter signed by Mairead Maguire, a peace activist from Northern Ireland; Tawakkol Abdel-Salam Karman, a Yemeni journalist and politician; and Shirin Ebadi, an Iranian lawyer and political activist.

The controversy threatens to cast a shadow over Mr. Modi’s much anticipated visit to the United States, which begins this weekend and includes meetings with oil executives, a speech at the United Nations and a planned appearance with President Trump at an Indian diaspora event in Houston called Howdy, Modi!

The Gates Foundation, which focuses on health and anti-poverty programs, is honoring Mr. Modi for his ambitious Clean India campaign, centered on an initiative that has built 100 million new toilets in India over the past five years — roughly 40 every minute.

Public sanitation has vexed India for a long time, and no one can dispute that Mr. Modi has done more than any other Indian prime minister, or perhaps any other world leader, when it comes to building toilets. His campaign is widely credited with reducing disease and greatly aiding women’s safety.

But Mr. Modi is a polarizing figure. While many Indians champion his efforts to fight poverty and see him as a strong, decisive leader, some have accused him of becoming increasingly authoritarian and empowering Hindu fundamentalists at great cost to India’s minorities.

Image
CreditManish Swarup/Associated Press

During his trip to the United States, he might face questions about his Hindu nationalist political party’s history of stirring up tensions between India’s majority Hindus and its minority Muslims. His government’s recent moves to fully seize Kashmir, a Muslim-majority territory contested by Pakistan, is likely to be an issue.

The Gates Foundation, funded by the Microsoft fortune of Bill Gates, now finds itself in the middle.

The foundation says it still plans to present Mr. Modi with the Goalkeepers Global Goals Award at a ceremony in New York on Tuesday. The award is designed to celebrate an elected official who has promoted sustainable development goals, the foundation says.

On Monday, a handful of protesters, including some wearing “I Stand with Kashmir” T-shirts, delivered a petition with thousands of signatures to the foundation’s headquarters in Seattle. An activist group called Stop Genocide has been pushing the petition.

In response to the mounting questions, the Gates Foundation released a statement explaining its decision.

“Globally, sanitation-related diseases kill nearly 500,000 children under the age of 5 every year,’’ it said. “Yet despite its importance, sanitation has not received significant attention. A lot of governments are not willing to talk about it, in part because there are not easy solutions.’’

The reaction inside India has been muted. One publication, The Economic Times, referred to the people opposing the award as “a motley collection of Indian secularists, Pakistanis, activists and entertainers.’’

A spokesman for the opposition Congress Party, Sanjay Jha, criticized in a Twitter post the decision to give Mr. Modi the award.

“Why are we making a hullabaloo about @BillGates giving an award to PM Modi?” he said. “History tells you that Big Business will always support political establishments wherever it suits their shareholder value. It’s pure algorithm of money.”

Image
CreditHarish Tyagi/European Pressphoto Agency

A few celebrities have taken a stand, namely the British actor and model Jameela Jamil and the rapper and actor Riz Ahmed, both of whom pulled out of participating in the awards ceremony, as confirmed by the Gates Foundation. Neither have provided public statements on their reasons for it.

Many Indians feel Mr. Modi has bettered the lives of the poor with far-reaching social projects including the toilet initiative and pledging $359 billion in aid to the nation’s struggling farmers, as well as a plan to build 20 million new homes over the next three years. Mr. Modi won a second term in an electoral landslide in May.

But others have pointed to the surge of religiously-driven attacks while Mr. Modi has been in power. The vast majority of the victims have been Muslims or lower-caste Hindus.

And his moves on Kashmir, a flash-point territory also claimed by Pakistan, have raised deep concerns outside India.

Last month, Mr. Modi’s government swiftly and unilaterally removed the autonomy that the state of Jammu and Kashmir, which includes the restive Kashmir Valley, held for decades. The Modi administration also decided to strip the area of its statehood and turn it into two federally controlled enclaves.

To quash any unrest, the government deployed thousands of extra troops, severed internet and mobile phone service to millions of people and arrested thousands of Kashmiri intellectuals, including democratically elected representatives.

The letter by the Nobel laureates expressed concern about the state of education in Kashmir, which has been severely hampered by the security measures. Most schools have been closed for more than a month and Indian officials have been at a loss to say when students will return.

“As one of your organization’s goals is to ‘ensure that young people survive and thrive,’ please consider this statistic: In 2016 (the year the most recent data has been available), schools in Kashmir were open for only four months out of the year,” the letter stated.

An Indian government spokesman would not comment for this article. But Indian officials have defended Mr. Modi’s actions on Kashmir, saying that the area has been plagued with conflict and bloodshed for decades and that the new arrangement will promote peace.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/world/asia/narendra-modi-bill-gates-foundation.html

2019-09-20 08:39:00Z
52780382785625

Kamis, 19 September 2019

Justin Trudeau brownface controversy: Canadian politicians slam prime minister over "troubling" photo - CBS News

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is asking for forgiveness in the middle of his reelection campaign after a photo of him wearing brownface was made public. But the leader of the New Democratic Party slammed the prime minister for the 2001 image, calling it "troubling" and "insulting."

"It's making a mockery of someone for what they live and what their lived experiences are," said party leader Jagmeet Singh. "I think he needs to answer for it."
 
The picture, published in a Time magazine article online, appears in a 2001 yearbook from a private school where Trudeau used to teach. He said the costume was from a party with an "Arabian Nights" theme. 

"This was something that was unacceptable and yes, racist," Trudeau said, adding that he's "deeply sorry" for the photo.  
 
"I take responsibility for my decision to do that," the prime minister added. "I shouldn't have done it, I should've known better."
 
Trudeau also admitted he wore brownface as a high school student. An additional photo appears to confirm his story that he used dark makeup to imitate singer Harry Belafonte at a talent show.
 
Trudeau has built his political reputation on the promotion of freedom and diversity in Canada. With Canada's federal election just over a month away, the fallout could cast a shadow over Trudeau's campaign. When asked why he didn't mention the photo earlier, Trudeau said "I'm talking about it now."  
 
Trudeau isn't the first politician to be called out as racist for wearing dark makeup. Among them is Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, who talked about the controversy with "CBS This Morning" co-host Gayle King in February.
 
"The man you're looking at and talking to right now is not who I was," Northam told King.  
 
As a leader on the international stage, Trudeau said his focus is now moving forward.
 
"I think what is important is that, yes, people get challenged on mistakes they've made in the past, that they recognize those mistakes, and they pledge to do better," Trudeau said. "That's what we expect of people."

When asked by reporters if he would resign from office, Trudeau did not offer a direct response. In a statement, Conservative Party and official opposition leader Andrew Scheer said Trudeau is "not fit to govern."

© 2019 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justin-trudeau-brownface-canada-politicians-slam-prime-minister-over-troubling-insulting-photo/

2019-09-19 11:39:00Z
52780387462213

Saudi Oil Facility Attack: What We Know - NPR

A photograph taken by the commercial satellite company Planet shows the Abqaiq facility shortly after an attack on Sept. 14. Planet Labs Inc. hide caption

toggle caption
Planet Labs Inc.

On Sept. 14, a major Saudi oil processing plant was rocked by a series of explosions. The facility, and another oil field to the south, had been attacked from the air. Here's what we know - at this time - about the attacks based on physical evidence.

The strike was large and sophisticated

Images from commercial satellites released by the U.S. government show at least 17 points of impact at the two sites. The larger facility, known as Abqaiq, is one of the world's most important oil production facilities and has long been a potential target for attack. Within that vast plant, the perpetrators seemed to have singled out valuable equipment that would be difficult to replace, and storage tanks that might contain flammable materials.

This annotated image released Sunday by the U.S. government and DigitalGlobe shows damage to the infrastructure at Saudi Aramco's Abqaiq oil processing facility. U.S. Government/DigitalGlobe/AP hide caption

toggle caption
U.S. Government/DigitalGlobe/AP

The group which has claimed responsibility probably didn't do it

Shortly after the attack, Houthi rebels in Yemen announced that they had launched drones against the Saudi facilities. The Houthis have conducted numerous drone attacks inside Saudi Arabia in the past, but there are a number of reasons to question their latest claim.

The first reason is simple math: there were 17 impact points, but Houthi spokesman Yahya Saree said that only 10 drones were launched by the rebel group.

Second is the matter of distance. The facilities that were struck lie roughly 500 miles from Yemen's border with Saudi Arabia. The Houthi weapons that have been used thus far simply don't have the range.

Third is the attack's level of sophistication, according to Fabian Hinz, a research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Monterey, Calif. "Would the Houthis be capable of flying a single drone or two drones into Abqaiq? I would say yes," Hinz says. "But would they be able to conduct such a vast coordinated mission to strike the facility with so much success? I would honestly say no."

Saudi Arabia has shown wreckage of drones and missiles that look Iranian

Even before the Saudi announcement, unverified photos popped up on Twitter which showed the wreckage of a missile in the desert with striking similarities to Iranian technology.

The wreckage of a cruise missile which Saudi officials say failed to reach one of its targets strongly resembles an Iranian design. Amr Nabil/AP hide caption

toggle caption
Amr Nabil/AP

At a press conference Wednesday, Col. Turki al-Maliki, spokesman for the Saudi-led coalition fighting Houthi rebels in Yemen, displayed the remains of several missiles and drones that he said were recovered from the attacked facilities and the areas surrounding them.

At least one of the delta-wing drones looks like it could be a type that previously appeared at a military exhibition in Iran, according to images displayed by al-Maliki and verified by outside experts.

The missiles al-Maliki described as being similar to Iran's Ya-Ali cruise missile, a kind of land-attack missile, is capable of traveling hundreds of miles with a small warhead. Hinz believes the missiles more closely resemble another Iranian design, a variant of which is known as the Quds-1.

Regardless of the exact type, the missile is clearly Iranian, says Hinz. "I would say there's little doubt that the cruise missiles we've seen originated in Iran."

The impacts on the site were made by objects coming from the west or northwest

Satellite images show that storage tanks at Abqaiq were struck from a northwest direction, al-Maliki says. He also claims that debris from three cruise missiles that failed to reach Abqaiq were recovered from north of the site. The trajectories suggest the missiles were launched from Iran or Iraq.

Frank Pabian, a long-time imagery analyst, says the impacts look like they may have struck from the west.

Impact sites suggest that the attacking drones or missiles likely came from the northwest, according to Saudi officials. U.S. Government/DigitalGlobe/AP hide caption

toggle caption
U.S. Government/DigitalGlobe/AP

Regardless, Hinz says, the direction of the impact doesn't necessarily indicate the launch point. Both cruise missiles and drones can take circuitous routes to their targets.

Still, says Hinz, "If we talk about the general balance of probability, it's much more likely they came from the north."

Other sources of information may soon be available

The United States military monitors the region closely with satellites, drones, radar and other sensors. According to NPR's Tom Bowman, Pentagon officials say they have imagery of Iranian forces inside Iran preparing for a strike before the attack. So far, the U.S. has not released any evidence it collected of those preparations or of the attack itself.

It may also be possible to glean more details from the wreckage of the drones and missiles. Al-Maliki noted in his press conference that experts continue to analyze the hardware of the GPS-guided drones. It may be possible to extract the route they flew before crashing. A similar analysis of drone boats launched by the Houthis in 2016 revealed 93 sets of coordinates that provided clues about the boats' mission.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/09/19/762065119/what-we-know-about-the-attack-on-saudi-oil-facilities

2019-09-19 10:00:00Z
52780382632806

CNN's Don Lemon knocks Trump while praising Justin Trudeau's apology over brownface photo - Fox News

CNN anchor Don Lemon squeezed in a swipe of President Trump while praising Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for his handling of the brownface photo controversy that emerged Wednesday night.

Trudeau apologized after a 2001 photo emerged in a Time magazine report showing him wearing brownface makeup to an “Arabian Nights” party at the private school where he was teaching.

"I shouldn't have done that. I should have known better, but I didn't and I'm really sorry," Trudeau told reporters. "I take responsibility for my decision to do that. I shouldn't have done that. I should've known better. It was something that I didn't think was racist at the time but now I recognize that it was something racist to do and I'm deeply sorry."

CANADIAN PM JUSTIN TRUDEAU ADMITS TO WEARING BROWNFACE IN 2001 PHOTO, APOLOGIZES

Lemon expressed his pleasant shock that a "leader" would apologize and knocked the U.S. leader in the process.

"Wow, a leader apologizing. It seems odd, doesn't it?" Lemon reacted. "Because we have one who doesn't."

The CNN panel also offered a defense for Trudeau, with commentators stressing that "context matters" and stressed that Trudeau's photo was vastly different from Democratic Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam's 1986 blackface photo.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Before wrapping up the segment, however, Lemon reiterated his praise for Trudeau.

"I do have to say this before we go: think about it however you want to think about it. When someone apologizes- wow!" Lemon said to the panel. "We don't often see that here, especially in a world leader who is saying 'I should've known better and I'm sorry.' You can feel about it however you want, but that, to me, that does mean a lot."

Fox News' Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-don-lemon-justin-trudeau-brownface-photo

2019-09-19 09:10:20Z
52780387462213

Boris Johnson's Parliament suspension case reaches final day in Supreme Court: Live updates - CNN International

John Major.
John Major. Jack Taylor/Getty Images

Thursday's busy Supreme Court schedule will include a remarkable and unprecedented sight: that of a former British Prime Minister making a case against the incumbent in the country's highest court.

John Major will be represented by a lawyer and will not be speaking himself. But he has already submitted a written case to the court that accuses Boris Johnson of shutting down Parliament to stop lawmakers from interfering with the Prime Minister's Brexit strategy.

Major himself controversially prorogued Parliament for three weeks in the run-up to the 1997 general election, a move critics claimed was motivated by his desire to stop the publication of a report about Conservative MPs accepting bribes.

Here's a few key lines from Major's submission.

On Johnson's motive for suspending Parliament: "The decision was in fact substantially motivated by a desire to obstruct Parliament from interfering with the Prime Minister’s plans," Major's submission reads. Elsewhere, Major argues: "Somewhat strikingly, it remains genuinely unclear whether the Defendant disputes that proposition."

On the government refusing to submit any witness statements: "It would be very straightforward for the Prime Minister or a senior official to sign a witness statement confirming (for example) that the decision had nothing to do with Brexit if that were indeed the case, and despite repeated requests nobody has been prepared to do so," reads Major's submission.

On whether prorogation is a political matter, or one for the courts to consider: "In modern times the power of prorogation is not in any sense a matter of “high policy," Major's submission argues. "Indeed, in the vast majority of cases the decision to prorogue Parliament has no political content at all. The routine and regular prorogations of the last few decades are plainly not so politically sensitive that it would be wrong for the Court even to begin to examine them."

On Boris Johnson implying he might try to ignore a law instructing him to seek a Brexit extension if he can't secure a deal: "In circumstances where, for example, Parliament has passed an Act requiring the Prime Minister to seek an extension of the Article 50 deadline if certain conditions are met, and the Prime Minister is on record saying that he will never in any circumstances seek such an extension, it is all the more necessary that any legal analysis must have regard to the possibility of “extreme” scenarios as well as ordinary and uncontroversial ones."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://edition.cnn.com/uk/live-news/boris-johnson-supreme-court-thursday-dle-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-09-19 09:32:00Z
52780386775606

US supports Saudi 'right to defend itself': Pompeo - Al Jazeera English

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has backed Saudi Arabia's "right to defend itself" and said that Iran's behaviour would "not be tolerated", in a meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), according to a statement on his official Twitter account on Thursday.

Pompeo again condemned the weekend attack on Saudi oil fields that knocked out half of the country's oil production. The US top envoy has also supported the Saudi call for international experts to travel to the country to investigate, the Saudi news agency SPA said in a separate statement.

In the meeting, MBS told Pompeo the attacks on state oil company Saudi Aramco were aimed at destabilising security in the region and damaging the global supply of energy.

Speaking to reporters on his way to Jeddah, Pompeo had described the raids on key oil installations as an "act of war" and reiterated that it was an "Iranian attack". 

Iran has repeatedly denied it was behind the attacks that have heightened tensions in the region.

Yemen's Houthi rebels, who have been locked in a war with a Saudi-UAE-led coalition since 2015, has claimed responsibility for the attacks, warning Riyadh that their targets "will keep expanding".

But Saudi and US officials have said that evidence shows Iranian involvement.

Just before Pompeo's comments, Saudi military officials held a news conference and showed debris from the alleged weapons used during the attacks, saying there was "undeniable" evidence of Iranian aggression.

A defence ministry spokesman said there was no way the attacks could have been launched from Yemen. 

"The attack was launched from the north and unquestionably sponsored by Iran," Saudi Colonel Turki al-Malki said. "We are working to know the exact launch point." 

Al-Malki did not directly blame Iran for the attack when asked by journalists. He said once "the culprits" were identified they would "be held accountable".

Saudi oil attacks

Saudi defence ministry spokesman Colonel Turki Al-Malik displays on a screen drones which the Saudi government says attacked an Aramco oil facility [Hamad I Mohammed/Reuters] 

Trump and Saudi officials have stressed the need for caution in their response to the attacks. The US president has said he does not want war and is coordinating with the Gulf and European states.

Hillary Mann Leverett, chief executive of political risk consultancy Stratega and a former US diplomat, told Al Jazeera the Saudis use of the word "sponsorship" indicated a certain level of caution amid its current diplomatic isolation.

"They have no guarantee the US will back them up to retaliate against Iran or anyone else," she said. "They are in a really tough position with very few options. They are trying to lay out what evidence they can but there is a lot of doubt here in Washington, and I think around the world, about what the Saudis have to say given their record with Yemen, the Khashoggi killing and other issues."

Earlier on Wednesday, Trump said he ordered a major increase in sanctions on Iran, but gave no details. 

It is not clear yet what Pompeo's comments mean for the US response to the attacks.

US media, citing unnamed US officials, reported on Tuesday that evidence showed Saturday's attacks originated in southwestern Iran.

Three officials said they involved cruise missiles and drones, indicating a higher degree of complexity and sophistication than initially thought. The US has not made its evidence public.

The officials also did not provide evidence or explain what US intelligence they were using for evaluating the attack, which cut five percent of the world's oil production.

The new violence has led to fears that further action on any side could rapidly escalate a confrontation that has been raging just below the surface in the wider region in recent months. 

In June, Trump called off a military attack on Iran at the last minute after Tehran shot down an unmanned US military drone. Iran maintains the drone was in Iranian airspace. The US says it was in international territory.

Those tensions have been boiling since Trump pulled the US out of the 2015 nuclear agreement that curtailed Tehran's nuclear activities, and reimposed sanctions that sent Iran's economy into a tailspin.

SOURCE: Al Jazeera and news agencies

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/09/supports-saudi-defend-pompeo-190919014947414.html

2019-09-19 06:42:00Z
52780382632806

Rabu, 18 September 2019

Israel election: Netanyahu and rival Gantz headed for deadlock - BBC News

No clear winner has emerged from Israel's election, leaving a question mark over who will be prime minister, partial official results confirm.

With just over 60% of votes counted, the party of incumbent Benjamin Netanyahu is neck and neck with that of his centre-left main challenger.

The results indicate that each will struggle to form a majority coalition with smaller parties.

Mr Netanyahu is vying to stay in power for a record fifth term.

The latest results from Tuesday's vote suggest his Likud party won 31 seats, while his opponent Benny Gantz's Blue and White party garnered 32 seats, the Kan public broadcaster says.

A prime minister needs to command a 61-seat majority in the Knesset (parliament).

Mr Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, has been in office for 10 years.

The 69 year old has pledged to annex Jewish settlements and a swathe of other territory in the occupied West Bank if he is returned to power.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Palestinians, who seek a state in the West Bank and Gaza, with its capital in occupied East Jerusalem, have warned such a move will kill any hopes for peace.

Mr Gantz has not advocated any form of annexation, though his position on the creation of a Palestinian state is unclear. Like Mr Netanyahu, he has ruled out ever dividing Jerusalem.

What are the latest results?

Official results have been slow to be released, with only 60% of votes counted by 12:53 (09:53 GMT).

They put Blue and White slightly ahead of Likud, with an alliance of Arab parties third, the ultra-Orthodox Shas party fourth and Yisrael Beiteinu, a nationalist party, in fifth place. The tally does not say how this translates into seats in the Knesset.

Based on these reported results, neither leader can form a majority coalition without support from Yisrael Beiteinu.

That party's leader, Avigdor Lieberman, reiterated that he would only support a government comprising both Likud and Blue and White. However, Blue and White has ruled out sitting with Mr Netanyahu in a coalition.

Exit polls earlier presented a similar picture.

Netanyahu weakened

Analysis by Tom Bateman, BBC Middle East correspondent, Jerusalem

The prime minister is well short of being able to form a governing bloc of right-wing and religious parties that are prepared to sit with him. In fact the result leaves him in an even weaker position than he was after April's vote.

It's almost impossible to predict the outcome, with frenetic horse trading on the way and even the chance of parties fragmenting or politicians shifting allegiances. But as it stands, three broad themes seem among the possibilities:

  • A dominant new governing bloc of the two big rival parties: Likud with Blue and White. This only seems possible without Mr Netanyahu as Likud leader. Needless to say that's a deal breaker for him and, so far at least, for his party
  • Mr Netanyahu's political rival Avigdor Lieberman miraculously changes his mind and agrees to join a right-wing and religious Netanyahu government - something his voters understood would never happen
  • A third election - which nobody here has an appetite for.

In the meantime, Mr Netanyahu stays on, but watch this space. For a few weeks.

There was a muted response at Likud's election night headquarters in Tel Aviv.

Hundreds of chairs for party supporters remained empty as activists were kept outside the hall and leaders digested the numbers.

"There is no point starting to work out a coalition based on these numbers as they will change," Likud foreign affairs director Eli Hazan said.

But Blue and White was "cautiously optimistic" that Israel would get new leadership, spokeswoman Melody Sucharewicz told the Times of Israel.

Mr Lieberman prevented Mr Netanyahu from forming a coalition after the previous vote because he refused to back down over a longstanding dispute with religious parties over exempting ultra-Orthodox young men from military service.

However Mr Gantz could have an even more complex job to form a government, because of differences between left-wing parties.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49740981

2019-09-18 12:13:55Z
52780386271566