https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/24/uk/boris-johnson-first-week-queen-analysis-intl-gbr/index.html
2019-07-24 07:00:10Z
52780336314805
BEIJING — China on Wednesday warned that it would not tolerate protesters’ efforts to threaten the central government’s authority in Hong Kong and suggested that it could, if necessary, mobilize troops in the People’s Liberation Army garrison there to maintain order.
The warning came as the government released a new defense strategy that accused the United States of undermining global stability and identified separatism as China’s most immediate security threat.
In the case of Hong Kong, the chief spokesman for the Ministry of National Defense, Senior Col. Wu Qian, cited the protests on Sunday outside the central government’s liaison office in Hong Kong, which protesters painted with graffiti, suggesting that instances of violence were straining Beijing’s patience.
“The behavior of some radical protesters challenges the central government’s authority, touching on the bottom line principle of ‘one country, two systems,’” Colonel Wu said during a news conference announcing the new security strategy. “That absolutely cannot be tolerated.”
He pointedly cited a specific article in the Basic Law, which details relations between the city and Beijing, that allows the People’s Liberation Army to intervene to maintain order or assist in cases of natural disasters, when asked by Hong Kong’s leaders.
Beijing’s defense strategy, the first to be released in six years, also refused to rule out the use of force against Taiwan, which China claims as its territory, in the event the self-governing democracy took any formal steps toward independence. The document cited “external forces” that support such moves, an oblique reference to the United States, which has long provided political and military support to Taiwan.
The warnings about what are, to China, core matters of sovereignty underlined growing concern about threats to the central authority of the Communist Party government under Xi Jinping, who has repeatedly pledged never to cede any territory. Although China has long warned Taiwan against declaring formal independence, the warnings about the island were more detailed and voluminous than in previous defense strategies.
“We must resolutely point out that engaging in Taiwan independence is a road to a dead end,” said Colonel Wu, who was joined by several senior military officials to detail aspects of the new strategy document. “If anyone dares to try to split Taiwan from China, the Chinese Army will certainly not hesitate to fight and resolutely defend the sovereignty, unification and territorial integrity of the country.”
The Chinese government said Wednesday it will not rule out the use of force in its effort to reunite Taiwan with the mainland.
Beijing's latest Defense Ministry report listed the containment of Taiwanese and Tibetan "separatists" as its top priorities. The report also said the United States’ deployment of a missile defense system in South Korea has undermined the regional strategic balance.
RUSSIA CONFIRMS JOINT AIR PATROL WITH CHINA AFTER SOUTH KOREA CLAIMS AIRSPACE VIOLATION
"If anyone dares to separate Taiwan from China, the Chinese army will certainly fight, resolutely defending the country's sovereign unity and territorial integrity," said Defense Ministry spokesman Wu Qian.
Taiwan separated from mainland China in 1949 during civil war. The communist-ruled country, however, does not accept the democratic country’s independence.
The U.S. maintains a one-China policy and doesn’t have diplomatic ties with Taiwan, but occasionally supplies the country with defense equipment and support.
China threatened to sanction the U.S. after a $2.2 billion arms sales to Taiwan was tentatively approved earlier this month.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Taiwan said it requested the aid over concerns regarding Chinese military expansion.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Firing more than 350 rounds in warning off a Russian radar aircraft that twice entered its airspace on Tuesday, South Korea signaled its resolve to Russia, China, and indirectly, also North Korea.
The use of force was proportionate to the Russian action. With two separate incursions into South Korea's airspace, the Russian Air Force showed wanton disregard for Seoul's sovereignty and its rights under international law. Even by Russian standards, this action was extreme. But the context matters.
Operating alongside the Chinese air force, the Russians intended to intimidate South Korea and Japan and aggravate the United States. Fortunately, the South Korean military has sent a rather unmistakable warning that this kind of incident should not reoccur.
The U.S. should welcome this courage. The evolving Chinese-Russian alliance intends to undercut the American-led democratic international order. It requires riposte wherever it figuratively or literally (as in this case) crosses the line.
But the Russians were somewhat stupid here. After all, China will likely be unhappy with the excessive Russian aggression. That's because Beijing wants to limit Seoul's increasing association with the broader U.S. security umbrella in Southeast Asia. But Russia's aggression will only encourage Seoul to do the opposite and double down on U.S. support, especially in air and missile defense capabilities: two areas Beijing is desperate to see Seoul avoid.
South Korea has also sent an indirect message to North Korea. Kim Jong Un, even before taking the leadership reins in Pyongyang, has regarded Seoul as a malleable foe to be corralled by threat and dominated by force. South Korean President Moon Jae-in has sometimes reinforced this perception by supporting appeasement in face of Kim's escalation. But Tuesday's action will force the North Koreans to reassess that understanding.
In short: Well done, South Korea.
Top White House economic adviser Larry KudlowLawrence (Larry) Alan KudlowMORE on Tuesday denied that President TrumpDonald John Trump5 things to know about Boris Johnson Conservatives erupt in outrage against budget deal Trump says Omar will help him win Minnesota MORE fabricated his claim that he was asked to mediate the decades-long dispute between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir territory.
“The president doesn’t make things up,” Kudlow said at the White House when asked if Trump made up the request, telling reporters “that’s a very rude question, in my opinion.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Kudlow declined to elaborate, saying it is a better question for Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoKudlow: 'The president doesn't make things up' Democrats, advocacy groups urge Pompeo to abolish new 'unalienable rights' commission Trump threatens Guatemala with penalties over migration MORE or national security adviser John BoltonJohn Robert BoltonKudlow: 'The president doesn't make things up' Trump met with Nunes to discuss potential replacements for Dan Coats: report Five things to know about Turkey's rift with Trump MORE.
“While Kashmir is a bilateral issue for both parties to discuss, the Trump administration welcomes #Pakistan and #India sitting down and the United States stands ready to assist,” the State Department tweeted on Monday.
While Kashmir is a bilateral issue for both parties to discuss, the Trump administration welcomes #Pakistan and #India sitting down and the United States stands ready to assist. - AGW
— State_SCA (@State_SCA) July 22, 2019
During a Monday meeting with Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, Trump said that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked him to broker an end to the violent border dispute.
“I was with Prime Minister Modi two weeks ago, and we talked about this subject. And he actually said, ‘Would you like to be a mediator or arbitrator?’ I said, ‘Where?’ He said, ‘Kashmir,’ ” Trump said.
The Indian government pushed back against the claim, saying Monday that “no such request has been made by PM @narendramodi to US President.”
Kabul, Afghanistan -- The Afghan government asked Tuesday for clarification of President Donald Trump's statement that the U.S. military could end the war in Afghanistan in 10 days, but that the country would be wiped out in the process. Mr. Trump suggested on Monday, in a seemingly off-hand remark, that he could order such a military intervention in lieu of a peaceful resolution to the 18-year-war that began with the U.S.-led invasion to topple the Taliban.
Mr. Trump made the remarks Monday during a meeting with Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, whose help he seeks in negotiating a peace deal with the Taliban that would enable U.S. forces to withdraw from Afghanistan.
Mr. Trump said he could win the Afghan war in just 10 days but it would also wipe "Afghanistan from the face of the earth."
"I could win that war in a week, I just don't want to kill 10 million people," Mr. Trump said. "Afghanistan would be wiped off the face of the earth," Mr. Trump said. "It would be over in literally, in 10 days, and I don't wanna go that route, so we're working with Pakistan and others to extricate ourselves."
The president did not offer any further explanation on Monday of his remarks or the reference to the hypothetical death of 10 million people. Afghanistan is home to more than 35 million people.
President Ashraf Ghani's office issued a statement on Tuesday asking for clarification on Mr. Trump's remarks and saying Afghanistan would never "allow any foreign power to determine its fate."
The statement also underlined that "cooperation and partnership with the world countries, particularly with the United States, is grounded on common interests and mutual respect."
Mr. Trump's strange remark came just as his top envoy to Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, confirmed that he was heading back to the region to try and push forward the negotiations for a peace deal with the Taliban.
One of the key points the U.S. has pushed on the Islamic extremist group during negotiations is that it must begin a direct dialogue with the Afghan government. The Taliban has refused to negotiate directly with President Ashraf Ghani's administration in Kabul thus far, dismissing it as a puppet regime of the U.S.
Khalilzad said in a tweet on Tuesday, just before arriving in Kabul, that Mr. Trump's remarks were meant to stress the administration's belief that, "there is no reasonable military solution to the war in Afghanistan, & that peace must be achieved through a political settlement."
He said his visit to the Afghan capital would remain, "focused on achieving an enduring peace that ends the war," in addition to cementing what he called "an enduring relationship w/ Afghanistan."
The Trump administration's relations with the Ghani government have been strained at times, however, as the White House forges ahead with its negotiations with the Taliban. The Afghan leadership has been left somewhat side-lined by the process, but Khalilzad's team repeatedly stresses that any eventual U.S. peace deal with the Taliban would require the militant group to engage in direct talks with Kabul.
Mr. Trump has previously expressed frustration with the drawn-out and costly U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan, and has made clear that he wants to withdraw American forces from the country.
More than 2,400 U.S. service personnel have died in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led coalition invaded in October 2001 to oust the Taliban and hunt down al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden.