Selasa, 23 Juli 2019

Boris Johnson to Be U.K. Prime Minister - The New York Times

LONDON — Boris Johnson, Britain’s brash former foreign secretary, on Tuesday won the contest to succeed Prime Minister Theresa May, with his party handing the job of resolving the country’s three-year Brexit nightmare to one of the architects of the project, and one of the country’s most polarizing politicians.

Mr. Johnson beat Jeremy Hunt, his successor as foreign secretary, in the battle for the leadership of Britain’s governing Conservative Party, winning 66 percent of the postal vote held among its membership. Although the Conservatives’ working majority in Parliament is very small, it appears to be enough to ensure that Mr. Johnson will succeed Mrs. May as prime minister on Wednesday.

He would take office at one of the most critical moments in Britain’s recent history, immediately facing the toughest challenge of his career, to manage his nation’s exit from the European Union in little more than three months. But his policy swerves, lack of attention to detail and contradictory statements leave the country guessing how things will unfold.

Image
CreditJacob King/Press Association, via Associated Press

“I know that there will be people around the place who will question the wisdom of your decision, and there may even be some people here who still wonder quite what they have done,” Mr. Johnson told the party meeting in London on Tuesday at which the vote results were announced.

While he has a mandate from his party’s dues-paying members, the hard facts that brought down Mrs. May have not changed: deep divisions on Brexit among Conservatives in Parliament, implacable opposition from other parties, and the insistence of European officials that they will make no major concessions.

Mr. Johnson has doubled down lately on Brexit, promising to take Britain out of the European Union by the Oct. 31 deadline “do or die,” if necessary risking the economic dislocation of leaving without any agreement, rather than seek an extension.

“We’re going to get Brexit done on Oct. 31, we’re going to take advantage of all the opportunities that it will bring in a new spirit of can-do, and we’re once again going to believe in ourselves,” he promised on Tuesday. “Like some slumbering giant, we’re going to rise and ping off the guy-ropes of doubt and negativity.”

Image

Listen to ‘The Daily’: The Making of Boris Johnson

Campaigning for Brexit helped put Boris Johnson in position to become the British prime minister. Soon, he may have to figure out how to deliver it.
transcript
bars
0:00/29:48
-29:48

transcript

Listen to ‘The Daily’: The Making of Boris Johnson

Hosted by Michael Barbaro, produced by Michael Simon Johnson, Lynsea Garrison and Adizah Eghan, and edited by Lisa Tobin

Campaigning for Brexit helped put Boris Johnson in position to become the British prime minister. Soon, he may have to figure out how to deliver it.

michael barbaro

From The New York Times, I’m Michael Barbaro. This is “The Daily.” After trying and failing to deliver Brexit, British Prime Minister Theresa May will resign this week. Today: The story of how the man expected to succeed her made Brexit, and how Brexit is now making him prime minister. It’s Monday, July 22.

archived recording (theresa may)

I will shortly leave the job that it has been the honor of my life to hold. I do so with no ill will, but with enormous and enduring gratitude to have had the opportunity to serve the country I love.

[music]

michael barbaro

Sarah, catch me up on what happened after that moment when Theresa May announces that she’s stepping down.

sarah lyall

Well, it touched off an immediate mad scramble over who would replace her. And under party rules, the next party leader is chosen only by members of the Conservative Party. And it’s they who will be selecting the next leader of the party and thus the next prime minister of the U.K.

michael barbaro

And who is expected to be at this point?

sarah lyall

At this point, it’s a shoo-in for Boris Johnson. Unless something bizarre happens, he will be the next prime minister.

archived recording

[MUSIC]

michael barbaro

And Sarah, who is Boris Johnson?

archived recording

He is the Conservative M.P. for Henley. He’s editor of The Spectator. And it seems he’s 92 times better than me at hosting topical news quizzes. Ladies and gentlemen, Boris Johnson. [CHEERING AND APPLAUSE]

sarah lyall

He is a celebrity politician.

archived recording (boris johnson)

This is a totally ecumenical cross-party venture, my friends. Now, this is a once in a lifetime chance.

sarah lyall

And he is extraordinarily visible by the way he looks. He has a massive shock of bright white hair.

archived recording

And how long have you been cutting your own hair? [LAUGHTER]

archived recording (boris johnson)

I think that was a low blow.

sarah lyall

He’s incredibly articulate.

archived recording (boris johnson)

Are you saying they haven’t the guts to put questions to me? Great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jellies.

sarah lyall

He’s incredibly funny. He’s incredibly charming.

archived recording

Have you snorted cocaine? [LAUGHTER]

archived recording (boris johnson)

I tried to.

archived recording

You’ve tried to snort cocaine?

archived recording (boris johnson)

Unsuccessfully, a long time ago. [LAUGHTER]

archived recording

Sir, what are you thinking?

archived recording (boris johnson)

I sneezed.

archived recording

What was unsuccessful about it?

archived recording (boris johnson)

I sneezed. [LAUGHTER]

sarah lyall

He’s also incredibly — what the Brits would call shambolic. He doesn’t get to places on time. He’s disorganized. He’s ill-prepared. He can’t remember what meeting he’s at and what he’s supposed to be doing.

archived recording (boris johnson)

We’ve got a fantastic guy called — oh, he’s brilliant. It’s either — he’s a superb man — Sterling, Gurling, something like that. What’s he called? Come on, what is it again? Tell me the name. Come on.

archived recording

You should get it. No, serious, it’s not my job to —

archived recording (boris johnson)

Stop sitting there like a great, big, fat Buddha and tell me the name of this guy.

michael barbaro

Sarah, when I think of British government, and certainly when I think about the prime minister, I think of a certain level of kind of stuffy formality and sobriety. How does this person that you’re describing, how does that person become the first in line to become prime minister?

sarah lyall

So there’s really two ways to look at him. He is all those things. He is bumbling. He is shambolic. But at the same time, a lot of his moves over his career have been quite calculated. It’s often been in the service of either getting attention or getting power. So for example, he started as a journalist.

michael barbaro

What was his reputation as a journalist?

sarah lyall

Well, very entertaining. He’s really funny and inaccurate. And he would write articles about the European Union, where he’d exaggerate and sort of cast the European Union as this terrible bureaucracy, trying to take things away from citizens. It was sort of the stuff that made no sense. It was like, the E.U. was going to regulate condoms and make them all one-size-fits-all.

michael barbaro

[LAUGHS]

sarah lyall

And it was going to ban shrimp-flavored potato chips.

michael barbaro

And it was going to really do neither.

sarah lyall

No, it was going to do neither. And the other journalists who were covering the same things would be yelled at by their editors, who would say, why aren’t you covering the same stuff Boris is? And he set a tone for the coverage of the European Union. It was just wrong. And when he was asked about it, he said, it doesn’t matter what the facts are that you marshal in service of that thesis. The thesis is right.

archived recording

[MUSIC]

sarah lyall

And he talked about it once. He went on a program called “Desert Island Discs,” which is a BBC program where you talk about your favorite music.

archived recording

My castaway this week is a politician and a journalist, prone to getting into scrapes, a word that suits his rather Wodehousian image.

sarah lyall

And he was talking about his coverage. And he said —

archived recording (boris johnson)

See, everything I wrote from Brussels I find was sort of — I was just chucking these rocks over the garden wall, and there’s an amazing crash from the greenhouse next door over in England. Everything I wrote from Brussels were having this amazing, explosive effect on the Tory Party. And it really gave me this, I suppose, rather weird sense of power.

archived recording

But this made your reputation as a journalist, didn’t it?

sarah lyall

It started to inform the Tory Party’s attitude toward Europe. And so he was welcomed by them as someone really telling the truth about Europe for the first time.

michael barbaro

So he was finding an audience among Britain’s conservatives?

sarah lyall

Yes.

michael barbaro

And was he himself actually a conservative?

sarah lyall

Yeah, he was always a conservative. But there are different strains in the Conservative Party. And at least in the beginning, it seemed his biggest motivation was to get in Parliament, and that way to start building a base toward having more power. But at that point, it was sort of unclear what his convictions were. And as he said in an interview at the time, when he was asked what he would resign over, if there was any principle that would be so important to him, he said, “I’m a bit of an optimist, so it doesn’t tend to occur to me to resign. I tend to think of a way of Sellotaping everything together and quietly finding a way through if I can.” In other words, he would sort of do what it took to kind of paper over the edges in order to get through it in order to remain in office.

michael barbaro

Which is another way of saying, when it comes to his convictions, they are malleable.

sarah lyall

Yes. And that’s illustrated again when he runs for mayor in 2008, because he refashions himself then. He positions himself as a liberal, urbane man of multicultural London. He’s pro-business, but he’s pro-immigrants.

archived recording (boris johnson)

If you’ve been here for more than 10 to 12 years, I’m afraid the authorities no longer really pursue you. They give up.

archived recording

So should we have that amnesty?

archived recording (boris johnson)

Well, why not be honest about what is going on?

archived recording

So have that amnesty?

archived recording (boris johnson)

Yeah, absolutely.

sarah lyall

Like, he’s this really old-fashioned conservative, who went to Oxford, speaks in a really posh accent, which isn’t supposed to go over well with regular people. And regular people love him. He would walk through the streets of London and people would sort of yell, hey, Boris. Women found him really attractive.

archived recording

Boris says what he means, and he delivers.

sarah lyall

There’s just something about him that made him a really good candidate. So then he gets elected mayor, which was actually an amazing feat. A conservative would never get elected in London, and it was based purely on personal popularity.

archived recording (boris johnson)

I do not, for one minute, believe that this election shows that London has been transformed overnight into a conservative city.

[music]

sarah lyall

And then he continued with these sort of funny statements. And he also showed to the world a kind of physical comedy.

archived recording

He got himself into pretty deep water today.

sarah lyall

So he once was at the Thames doing something, and he fell into the river.

archived recording (speaker 1)

Oh, then really badly.

archived recording (speaker 2)

And this is the best bit. This is the best bit here. She pulls down the volunteer with him.

sarah lyall

And then what a lot of people saw was, during the 2012 Olympics, he was trying to promote Britain or promote London or something, and he went down this zip wire. And he got stuck in a zip wire, and he had this sort of wedgie. And he was stuck in the middle.

archived recording (speaker 1)

Hey, Boris, you’re going the wrong way.

archived recording (speaker 2)

This way.

archived recording (speaker 1)

Boris, this way.

sarah lyall

He looked so ridiculous. Look at his little blue hat. He’s wearing the most ill-fitting outfit. Oop, it just stopped. And he’s dangling.

archived recording (boris johnson)

It’s going well. It’s very, very well-organized. What they do — get me a ladder.

michael barbaro

He’s really kind of hamming it up.

sarah lyall

Yes, he is.

michael barbaro

And the crowd beneath him, it seems kind of charmed.

sarah lyall

Look at them all taking pictures of him, laughing. He makes people feel good. He really does.

archived recording (boris johnson)

Can you get me a rope? [LAUGHTER] Get me a rope, O.K.?

sarah lyall

Any other politician, that would have been the end, to be photographed like that. But he turned it into a plus. He turned it into a virtue, and people thought it was hilarious. And they thought he was cuddly and cute. The thing about when he was mayor is the first time he had that much power, and he was fantastic figurehead. He was a fantastic front man.

archived recording (boris johnson)

Finally, you have brought home a great truth about our country, that when we put our mind to it, there is absolutely nothing that this country cannot achieve.

sarah lyall

He was not a details person. He showed up late to things. He was ill-prepared. He wouldn’t read anything. He didn’t know about the policies. And luckily, the mayor of London isn’t that important a job, really. He doesn’t have a lot of responsibility, so he couldn’t really mess it up. But he was not a great mayor.

michael barbaro

So Boris Johnson has been a consistent source of amusement and controversy.

sarah lyall

Boris is constantly getting himself into trouble and constantly finding a way out of it through basically charm and bluster and an ability to talk himself out of any situation.

michael barbaro

And what trouble does he get himself out of?

sarah lyall

Well, there’s been a lot of trouble with women. He fathered a child with someone other than his wife while he was mayor of London and managed to never really have to discuss it publicly. When he was editor of The Spectator, he had an affair with one of his employees, who got pregnant, wrote about it. He denied in the beginning he’d had the affair. He lied to the journalists who asked. He lied to the prime minister. He got fired from his job. And somehow he got out of that, too. And it started to become clear that his disheveled, bumbling persona was calculated. And people have said — and I’ve seen it, too — before he goes on TV, he’ll run his hands through his hair to make it look messier, as if he couldn’t be bothered to ever brush it. He wants to look like that. And someone recently told this amazing story about how Boris came to speak at some kind of civic meeting, or a meeting of some industry group, and arrived five minutes late, right before he was supposed to speak. And sort of got up and looked and said, where am I speaking, what group is this, and told these anecdotes, and how he totally snowed the crowd. The crowd thought it was hilarious. They loved him. And the guy was really happy he pulled it off. Until he saw Boris do the exact same thing at a totally different group some months later, the exact same thing. He came late. He said, where am I? He told the same anecdotes, as if it was just off the top of his head.

michael barbaro

And in fact, it was a routine.

sarah lyall

It was a routine. It was a comedy routine designed to promote this view of him as this disheveled, bumbling person who could sort of pull it out at the last minute. He wants to seem that way.

michael barbaro

So a lot of this is an act. It’s kind of political theater.

sarah lyall

Exactly. And during that whole time, when people asked him, did he want to be prime minister, what was he going to do next? He would always slough it off with what looked like more of an act.

archived recording

Is there a possibility you could become prime minister?

archived recording (boris johnson)

I think that that is vanishing. I’ve about as much chance of being reincarnated as an olive. [LAUGHTER]

[music]

sarah lyall

And so meanwhile, though, he is quietly consolidating his popularity and preparing in his head somehow a way to challenge the prime minister, David Cameron. He’s way more popular than David Cameron, though he’s just an M.P. at this point. And the question is, how would he get there? What would he do? And then finally, in 2016, he sees a chance.

michael barbaro

And what is that chance?

sarah lyall

The chance is Brexit.

michael barbaro

We’ll be right back. So Sarah, pick us up where we left off. It’s 2016, and you said that Boris Johnson sees his chance to become prime minister. What’s happening at that moment?

archived recording (david cameron)

We are approaching one of the biggest decisions this country will face in our lifetimes, whether to remain in a reformed European Union or to leave.

sarah lyall

So it was then that the prime minister, David Cameron, called the referendum known as Brexit over whether Britain would leave the European Union.

archived recording (david cameron)

The choice goes to the heart of the kind of country we want to be and the future that we want for our children.

sarah lyall

He and his government were pro-Remain.

archived recording (david cameron)

My recommendation is clear. I believe that Britain will be safer, stronger and better off in a reformed European Union.

sarah lyall

And everyone assumed that the country felt the same way. And he assumes that all his allies in the Conservative Party will follow along with him —

michael barbaro

Including Johnson.

sarah lyall

— including Johnson, to campaign to remain. So Johnson was one of the people who was supposed to support him. And at the very last minute —

archived recording (boris johnson)

We have a chance, actually, to do something. I have a chance, actually, to do something.

sarah lyall

Boris became head of the Leave campaign.

archived recording (boris johnson)

I would like to see a new relationship, based more on trade, on cooperation, but as I say, with much less of this supranational element. So that’s where I’m coming from.

archived recording

Boris, if that’s really what you’ve thought all along, why have you kept your party waiting for such a long time?

archived recording (boris johnson)

The truth is that it has been agonizingly difficult.

michael barbaro

Is it clear at this moment whether Boris Johnson actually wants to leave the E.U.?

sarah lyall

Well, he wrote a famous editorial on the day he made this announcement of how he felt about it, saying, we should leave the E.U. Britain should leave the E.U. But it turned out later he had written an opposing editorial saying the exact opposite thing. It was only at the last minute that he decided to run with the “we should leave” version.

michael barbaro

Suggesting that the depth of his conviction here might have been shallow.

sarah lyall

Suggesting there was no depth of his conviction at all, that it was just political calculation and pragmatism. What would be better for Boris?

michael barbaro

Better for Boris how?

sarah lyall

Better for Boris in that he wanted power. And what he thought would happen, what everyone thought would happen, was the following — that Brexit would be voted down, that they’d remain in the European Union, but that David Cameron would be so weakened by the whole process that he would have to step down as prime minister, leaving Boris in place to take over. And then Boris would lead the country, not through Brexit — because Brexit would have been voted down — but he would have appeased the right wing of the party, and thus consolidated his power better than Cameron ever could.

michael barbaro

So this whole kind of move to backstab David Cameron by supporting Brexit at the last minute is based on his belief that Brexit would not actually happen, until it did.

archived recording

There we are. That is now statistically, mathematically there, that the Leave campaign have won. And we’re expecting at the end of the count 52 percent for Leave, 48 percent for Remain. Quite an extraordinary moment.

sarah lyall

Everybody was shocked. And if you see, there was an amazing moment where Boris Johnson comes out —

archived recording (boris johnson)

Today, I think all of us politicians —

sarah lyall

— the head of this campaign —

archived recording (boris johnson)

— should thank the British people —

sarah lyall

— to give a press conference —

archived recording (boris johnson)

— because, in a way, they have been doing our job for us.

sarah lyall

— to basically reassure the country that he is in control, that he knows what he’s doing.

archived recording (boris johnson)

They hire us to deal with the hard questions. And this year, we gave them one of the biggest and toughest questions of all.

sarah lyall

And he looks so frightened.

archived recording (boris johnson)

I believe the British people have spoken up for democracy.

sarah lyall

He looks like a deer caught in the headlights. He has no plan. It becomes clear he has no plan.

^archived recording (boris johnson)

Thank you, finally, to everybody at Vote Leave for the extraordinary and positive campaign you have run. Thank you.

michael barbaro

Then what happens?

archived recording (david cameron)

It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve our country as prime minister over these last six years.

sarah lyall

So then David Cameron quits. And they’re left with a power vacuum. Who is going to be the next prime minister? And at that point, it looked like Boris was a shoo-in. He was definitely going to get it. He had been the head of the Leave campaign. He was the most popular politician in the country.

michael barbaro

And this is what he’s always wanted.

sarah lyall

Yeah, everybody knew who he was. It’s what he’s always wanted. And he had a colleague, Michael Gove, who had also betrayed Cameron and helped him, helped Boris, with the anti-Europe campaign. And the idea was that Boris would be prime minister, and Michael Gove would be, like, chancellor of the Exchequer or some other really good job. And they’d sort of planned it all out. And there really weren’t any other legitimate candidates at that point. So that was, like, on a Friday, I think. And there was, I think, six days to figure this out, or about a week to figure it out. And they’re campaigning, and everyone’s like, what are they going to do? They have to put out some sort of plan. Boris writes this editorial for The Telegraph that’s supposedly putting out his political plan. There isn’t really a plan. It’s all chaotic. It’s all weird. Everyone’s getting scared. And then the day before Boris is meant to formally announce that he is putting his name forward to be prime minister —

archived recording (michael gove)

I thought it was right that, following the decision that the British people took last week —

sarah lyall

— Michael Gove, his great friend and ally through the whole campaign —

archived recording (michael gove)

And I hoped that Boris Johnson would be someone who could ensure that the government followed the instructions of the British people, and also build and unite a team around him in order to lead this country forward.

sarah lyall

— calls a press conference and says —

archived recording (michael gove)

And Boris is an amazing and an impressive person. But I’ve realized in the last few days that Boris isn’t capable of building that team and providing that unity.

sarah lyall

He doesn’t trust Boris. He thinks Boris would be a bad prime minister.

michael barbaro

Good lord.

sarah lyall

He’s withdrawing his support. Yes. And so —

^archived recording (boris johnson)

Well, I must tell you —

sarah lyall

Everybody who thought Boris is going to be prime minister is now saying he’s not going to be. And Boris has to withdraw from the race.

^archived recording (boris johnson)

I have concluded that person cannot be me.

michael barbaro

This is pretty humiliating.

sarah lyall

Really humiliating, and it felt like everything had finally caught up to him. He’d been exposed. The lying, the blundering, the sort of lack of preparation, the inability to follow through on things had all finally, finally come back to haunt him. He’d always gotten away with everything before. He was like the Teflon politician. And suddenly, he was having to accept the repercussions of what he had done.

michael barbaro

What happens?

sarah lyall

They have to find a compromise candidate. And everyone is sort of poisoned in one way or another, so they settle on this super unlikely figure, Theresa May.

archived recording (theresa may)

I have just been to Buckingham Palace, where Her Majesty the Queen has asked me to form a new government. And I accepted.

sarah lyall

And she tries, and she tries, and no one likes what she does.

michael barbaro

And where is Boris during all this period?

sarah lyall

Well, Boris is a dangerous figure. So she felt, the way Cameron did before, that she could sort of neuter him by giving him a job in her cabinet. So she makes him foreign secretary, another job he’s not very good at.

archived recording

Either they’re dissembling or lying, or you are. Four ambassadors said they heard it said several times. You said it’s not government policy, but you do support free movement. That’s four of them. They’re not lying.

^archived recording (boris johnson)

No, that’s complete nonsense. Yes. Well, I think that they have been misrepresented. And if I may say so, I’m not entirely convinced that your reporter talked to those ambassadors. And I think —

sarah lyall

He’s underprepared. He’s disheveled. He says things that aren’t true. He makes some bad blunders, but he sort of soldiers on.

michael barbaro

Sounds like Boris Johnson.

sarah lyall

Sounds like Boris Johnson. He’s Boris being Boris. And then he ends up resigning from the cabinet over what he says is Theresa May’s poor handling of the Brexit negotiations.

^archived recording (boris johnson)

We never actually turned that vision into a negotiating position in Brussels. And we never made it into a negotiating offer. Instead, we dithered.

sarah lyall

But really what he’s doing is starting to plot his next move.

[music]

archived recording

So the nos have it. The nos have it. Unlock! Indeed, point of order, the prime minister.

^archived recording (boris johnson)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the House has spoken, and the government will listen. It is clear that the House does not support this deal. But tonight’s vote tells us nothing about what it does support.

sarah lyall

Theresa May is like one of those — she’s, I’m afraid, like a bull in a bull ring, who has tons of stuff sticking out of her. And she’s staggering around, and people are throwing spears at her. And they’re sticking in, and she’s bleeding, and everyone’s criticizing her.

michael barbaro

This is so graphic.

sarah lyall

Sorry. And she keeps coming back.

archived recording

So the nos have it. The nos have it. Unlock!

sarah lyall

And trying again, and nobody likes anything she does.

archived recording (theresa may)

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, I profoundly regret the decision that this House has taken tonight.

sarah lyall

And she becomes more and more unpopular.

archived recording

So the nos have it. The nos have it. Unlock!

sarah lyall

And by the end, people are almost like, whoever gets in we prefer to Theresa May.

archived recording (theresa may)

Mr. Speaker, I think it should be a matter of profound regret to every member of this House that once again, we have been unable to support leaving the European Union — [SHOUTING] — in orderly fashion.

archived recording

Order.

sarah lyall

So the moment that Theresa May announces that she’s stepping down, Boris Johnson sees his second chance.

michael barbaro

To be prime minister.

sarah lyall

To be prime minister. Get her out, and then he can go in.

archived recording

I am pleased today, I am proud today, to introduce the candidate whom I shall support to lead the Conservative Party and our nation, a man who has already shown that he can lead this great global city through two successful terms. Ladies and gentlemen, Boris Johnson. [APPLAUSE]

michael barbaro

Sarah, are we to understand that all of this played out exactly the way that Boris Johnson would have hoped, that after he elevated Brexit, no matter what you think of it, Brexit has come around to elevate him?

sarah lyall

I think that’s right. I think in the last three years since the vote, he’s had to get his head around the fact, this is what’s going to happen. And if he has a conviction, this is now his conviction. And it’s a poisoned chalice, in my opinion. I feel like he’s set himself up for a task that’s almost impossible to carry out. And it’s kind of ironic that he’s gotten this job through something that he put into place and made it so difficult for himself. His political hero is Winston Churchill. He always wanted to be Winston Churchill. And I don’t see how anyone could be Winston Churchill throughout the Brexit process.

michael barbaro

Why not?

sarah lyall

It’s not like defeating the Nazis during the Second World War. It’s not a war. It’s a very, very complicated divorce from an entity that Britain is incredibly connected to in ways that most people don’t understand and take for granted. And I don’t see anyone coming out of it better off than they were before.

michael barbaro

So now this man, with what appears to be no deeply rooted political views, is going to be steering the U.K. through its greatest political challenge, perhaps, in history. And it’s exactly what he wanted.

sarah lyall

I’m not sure he wanted to have to be prime minister at this moment in history. But it’s the only chance he’s going to get. And he has a sort of blind optimism that he will be able to figure something out when he gets a job. And I think that’s the approach he’s taking now.

[music]

michael barbaro

Sarah, thank you very much.

sarah lyall

Thank you.

michael barbaro

And good luck in London.

sarah lyall

Thank you. Yeah, I’m flying there soon.

michael barbaro

So you’re going to be there for the election.

sarah lyall

I’ll be there again, yeah. And I’ll do what I thought I was supposed to do two years ago, the last time this came around, three years ago.

michael barbaro

Which is?

sarah lyall

I will write this story saying that Boris Johnson has become prime minister. That was supposed to happen before, and maybe it will happen this time.

michael barbaro

The winner of the Conservative Party election for prime minister is expected to be announced tomorrow. We’ll be right back. Here’s what else you need to know today. Internal documents from drug makers, distributors and pharmacies released on Friday reveal a lax approach to tracking suspicious orders of opioids that went on to kill tens of thousands of Americans. A Walgreens in Port Richey, Florida, ordered 3,271 bottles of oxycodone a month, despite a local population of just 2,831. According to the records, the Walgreens employee in charge of flagging such orders cleared them anyway. The records show that companies had little or no oversight in place for flagging suspiciously large orders. One major drug maker gave the job of stopping suspicious orders to sales staff, whose bonuses were tied to those sales. The records are now evidence in a major trial against the companies brought by nearly 2,000 towns and cities devastated by the opioid crisis. That’s it for “The Daily.” I’m Michael Barbaro. See you tomorrow.

Mrs. May and Mr. Johnson will visit Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace on Wednesday, for her assent to the transition. The short journey from Parliament to the palace will be the culmination of a colorful career for Mr. Johnson, a former journalist whose ambition as a child was to become “world king,” who wrote a biography of his hero Winston Churchill, and who has been praised by President Trump.

Mr. Johnson’s rare mix of charismatic bluster and absent-minded air — either charming or maddening, depending on the listener and the moment — and his unusual gift for communicating with voters have made him one of the country’s best-known politicians for years, and carried him to two terms as London mayor.

But his support for Brexit, and his penchant for pronouncements that do not always hold up under scrutiny, have also made him a highly divisive figure.

Parliament rejected Mrs. May’s exit plan three times this year, yet it is also firmly against risking severe disruption and huge economic damage by leaving without any agreement at all.

Image
CreditHollie Adams/EPA, via Shutterstock

Turbulence over Brexit has even raised questions about the durability of the United Kingdom itself, prompting renewed talk about possible Scottish independence and a united Ireland.

Mr. Johnson has said that a renegotiated Brexit settlement with the European Union would be the optimal outcome, though it is hard to envision how one could be hammered out and, given the looming summer vacation, approved in Parliament by the end of October. And there is no sign that the European Union is willing to contemplate the wholesale changes that Mr. Johnson has promised his supporters.

Though they will engage with him, other European leaders are hardly enthusiastic about Britain’s new prime minister in waiting. The reaction from Brussels on Tuesday was muted, with the European Union’s chief Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, tweeting that his team “look forward to working constructively” with Mr. Johnson.

As a reporter in Brussels from 1989 to 1994, Mr. Johnson specialized in a genre of journalism that ridiculed the European Union, playing on a sense of British detachment from the process of European integration.

Image
CreditJessica Taylor/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

In 2016, he became the figurehead of the campaign to leave the bloc and helped it to a victory that shocked much of the world. Earlier this year Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, said there was a “special place in hell” reserved for “those who promoted Brexit without even a sketch of a plan of how to carry it out safely.”

With efforts to quit the bloc stalled, Mr. Johnson has promised to ramp up British preparations for a “no deal” Brexit and argues that greater preparedness and political determination will force the European Union to offer a better deal than the one Mrs. May negotiated.

Most analysts think only modest changes are achievable. They do not believe that the bloc will scrap Mr. Johnson’s bugbear — the so-called Irish backstop plan that is designed to keep goods flowing without checks across the border between Northern Ireland and the Irish republic, whatever happens in trade talks.

Taking Britain out of the bloc without an agreement appears to be Mr. Johnson’s backup plan. But Parliament has voted in nonbinding motions against a no-deal exit, and opposition to it is growing.

Image
CreditChris Radburn/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Several ministers had already announced plans to quit the government, saying they could not support any policy that might lead to Brexit without an agreement. They include the chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, who is expected to play a significant role in trying to stop such an outcome.

Although other nations like Ireland would be very hard hit, one report said that the costs of “no deal” would be four times larger for the British than for the rest of the European Union collectively. That is because exports to the European Union make up around 13 percent of British gross domestic product, while exports the other way account for 2.5 percent of the bloc’s gross domestic product.

Mr. Johnson has not ruled out suspending Parliament to take Britain out of the European Union on Oct. 31, but last week lawmakers approved by 41 votes a measure that would make it harder to bypass Parliament.

Tobias Ellwood, a defense minister, told Sky News that even if Mr. Johnson pushed through a “no deal” Brexit he would have to “crawl back literally moments later” to ask the bloc for emergency arrangements. Amber Rudd, the work and pensions secretary, has also warned of a “collision with reality.”

Image
CreditAndrew Testa for The New York Times

Tony Blair, a former Labour Party prime minister, said that Mr. Johnson would, on arrival in Downing Street, be warned by officials that the European Union will not renegotiate the Irish backstop and that “no deal” is a huge risk.

“You have a thousand different issues as prime minister to deal with,” Mr. Blair said, “but in the short term he’s got one issue to deal with.”

Mr. Johnson would have to choose whether to back away from his promise to scrap the Irish backstop or try to pursue no deal — an outcome that could, if blocked by lawmakers, force a general election or possibly a second referendum, Mr. Blair said.

“He will face the facts and decide that if you try to engineer no deal without Parliament — against Parliament’s wishes — and without public endorsement, you better hope it works perfectly because if it doesn’t, you’re going to be in all sorts of difficulty for the rest of your time in politics,” Mr. Blair added.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/world/europe/boris-johnson-uk-prime-minister.html

2019-07-23 11:31:32Z
52780336314805

Boris Johnson, Brexit cheerleader, to become British prime minister - The Washington Post

BREAKING — Johnson is a colorful and controversial former foreign secretary, former London mayor and longtime Conservative columnist who galvanized the successful Brexit campaign in 2016. In a leadership contest involving only dues-paying members of the Conservative Party, he bested Jeremy Hunt, the current foreign secretary. Johnson formally becomes prime minister on Wednesday, following an audience with the queen. This is a developing story and will be updated.

LONDON — If the forecasts prove true, Boris Johnson is widely expected to be named the next British prime minister when the results of the Conservative Party leadership contest are announced Tuesday morning. 

The bombastic, Latin-quoting, Oxford classicist with the mop of intentionally mussed yellow hair, who made his name as an over-the-top journalist in Brussels and then as London mayor and galvanized the successful Brexit campaign in 2016, will likely walk through the black enameled door of 10 Downing Street on Wednesday — fulfilling what his biographers describe as his relentless “blond ambition” to follow his hero, Winston Churchill, into the top spot. 

In a leadership contest involving only dues-paying members of the Conservative Party, the former foreign secretary Johnson faced the current foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt. 

An announcement of the results is scheduled for late Tuesday morning. If Johnson wins the Tory leadership contest as predicted by the polls, chosen by the 160,000 dues-paying members of the Conservative Party, the transfer of power happens quickly.

On Wednesday, Theresa May will deliver her last remarks at a question-and-answer session in the House of Commons and then she will travel to Buckingham Palace to resign. Johnson will follow her to the palace, where Queen Elizabeth II will ask him to form a new government. Johnson will be 14th prime minister during the queen’s long reign.

The 55-year-old Johnson will take up residence at 10 Downing Street and within hours begin announcing his new cabinet. His 31-year-old girlfriend, Carrie Symonds, a former Conservative Party communications official and a top Tory spinner, may move in over the weekend, according to British press reports.

When the new prime minister clocks in for his first day of work in the top job, he will face an overflowing in-tray of daunting problems that need urgent attention, including — but not limited to — a showdown in the Persian Gulf with a belligerent Iran, vexing Brexit, assembling a top leadership team, the survival of his Conservative Party, ministerial resignations, rebels in Parliament and a raft of domestic issues ranging from housing to health care.

And President Trump. The postwar “special relationship” has had a rocky month, as the American president lashed out on twitter against the British ambassador in Washington, calling him “a pompous fool.”

Sir Kim Darroch provoked the president’s ire when a cache of secret diplomatic cables were leaked to a British tabloid. The memos from Darroch described Trump as “insecure” and his administration as “inept” and “dysfunctional.” Darroch resigned in the aftermath — after Johnson failed to back up, as the tabloids put it, “our man in Washington.”

[Want to understand Boris Johnson, Britain’s probable next prime minister? Read his incendiary journalism.]

Also looming are new redlines and deadlines in the mess called Brexit. May’s failure to deliver Brexit on time was the reason her Tory lawmakers ousted her.

Johnson, who was the face of the winning Brexit campaign in the June 2016 referendum, has vowed, “do or die,” Britain will leave the European Union in October.

Writing in Monday’s Telegraph, Johnson said, “it is time this country recovered some its can-do spirit.” He said that if the Americans could land men on the moon 50 years ago using hand-sewn bits of computer code, then 21st century Britain could imagine a way to provide for frictionless trade across the Northern Irish border, which has been one of the stumbling blocks of the Brexit deal.

“What we need now is the will and the drive,” Johnson said.

Tony Blair, the former Labour prime minister who opposes Brexit, was not impressed, telling the BBC that “the two things are obviously rather technically different.”

Yet the same math in the House of Commons that defeated May’s Brexit deal three times has not changed. The incoming prime minister will have a paper-thin working majority, protected by the Democratic Unionist Party in Northern Ireland.

In the Persian Gulf, the Iranians seized the British-flagged vessel (with an international crew, no Britons aboard) after Britain took an Iranian tanker in the Gibraltar Strait that London said was heading toward Syria. 

Johnson doesn’t have the best track record of diplomacy with Iran. When he was foreign secretary, Johnson mistakenly said that Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a British-Iranian woman visiting family, was teaching journalism in Iran. Zaghari-Ratcliffe was jailed for alleged espionage and her family said that Johnson’s comments didn’t help her case.

The new leader will in short order also choose a top leadership team, likely rewarding those who supported him and disappointing those who don’t get tapped for top jobs.

[Boris Johnson’s rise could be a preamble to his fall]

Johnson has warned that he will require that those who serve be prepared, as he is, to leave the European Union with no deal — a prospect that frightens many economists and leaders of British businesses, fishing and agriculture, who rely on tariff-free trade with the continent for their profits.

After a chaotic spring that saw Britain blow past its March 29 deadline to leave the E.U., things seem to have calmed down. But not for long. 

After the new leader is installed in 10 Downing Street, he will have just three months to come up with a plan that can win over both E.U. leaders and the British Parliament.

Nick Hargrave, a former special adviser at 10 Downing Street, argued that the first two days are “overwhelming” for all new governments. But in a series of tweets, he suggested that Johnson quickly make a few key decisions: Does he want a no-deal Brexit? Or cosmetic changes to May’s withdrawal agreement? And is the pathway to get there a general election or a second referendum or a showdown with Brexiteers in his own party?

Despite the do-or-die rhetoric, Johnson would prefer to leave with an amicable divorce deal, but not with May’s deal, which he called “dead.” 

Unlike his rival Hunt, Johnson didn’t give himself wiggle room on the deadline.

“Most politicians say one thing but they are actually saying something else, it’s not definite as you might think,” said Steven Fielding, a political historian at the University of Nottingham. 

But in Johnson’s case, he said, “he has given himself no caveats with the 31st of October. That’s it.”

British parliamentarians have been laying down a marker in hopes of preventing a no-deal Brexit, but it’s unclear how effective they could be.

The majority of lawmakers in Parliament are opposed to a no-deal Brexit, signaling a potential showdown to come. Some ministers are resigning their posts before Johnson can fire them over their opposition to his willingness to leave the bloc without a divorce deal.

On Monday, Alan Duncan quit his job as a Foreign Office minister. He said that Johnson “flies by the seat of his pants, and is all a bit sort of haphazard and ramshackle.”

He told the BBC that a Johnson-led administration could go “smack into a crisis of government.” Philip Hammond, the chancellor, and David Gauke, the justice secretary, also pledged to quit their posts if Johnson becomes prime minister.

“Things are really about to kick off again in a massive way because the irresistible force of Boris Johnson’s ego is about to meet the immovable force of the House of Commons,” said Rob Ford, a politics professor at the University of Manchester.

Over the weekend, Simon Coveney, Ireland’s deputy prime minister, said that the Irish government looks forward to engaging with the new British leader but warned against ripping up the existing agreement.

“If the approach of new prime minister is they are going to tear up the withdrawal agreement, then I think we’re in trouble,” Coveney told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show. “That’s a little bit like saying, ‘Give me what I want or I’m going to burn the house down for everybody.’”

Read more

Want to understand Boris Johnson? Read his incendiary journalism.

Theresa May packs her bags, her legacy dominated by failure

What’s up with Brexit? A guide to emergency summits, flextensions and more.

The UK’s new prime minister was picked by 0.25 percent of Brits

Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/boris-johnson-expected-to-win-british-prime-minister-vote/2019/07/23/0e63fc8e-ac93-11e9-9411-a608f9d0c2d3_story.html

2019-07-23 10:03:33Z
52780336314805

Fears of thugs-for-hire in Hong Kong after mob attack - CNN

The men, whose ages range from 24 to 54, will face charges of "unlawful assembly" police said in a press conference on Monday. Their motives are still under investigation but police said some of those arrested had links to local criminal gangs known as Triads.
Footage posted on social media Sunday night showed a marauding gang of masked men, wearing white T-shirts and wielding batons and sticks, blindly attacking crowds on the platform and inside train carriages at Yuen Long MTR station, in the far northwest of the city.
Tens of thousands had taken to the streets Sunday for the seventh consecutive weekend, amid an ongoing political crisis over a now-suspended extradition bill.
Many of those caught up in the violence were returning home after taking part in mass demonstrations in the city, leading to accusations that the gangs had been paid to stoke unrest and target protesters.
Forty-five people were hospitalized following the violence in Yuen Long, with one person in critical condition, according to Hong Kong's Information Services Department. Videos showed people being beaten on the floor and left bloodied and dazed.
The incident angered many in the city, a feeling that was exacerbated by police taking around an hour to arrive on scene and not making any arrests that night. The nature and ferocity of the attack also has people questioning Hong Kong police's ability to protect the city's residents.
Protesters have vowed to march in Yuen Long on Sunday to protest the violence.

What, or who, are Triads?

Men in white T-shirts with poles are seen in Yuen Long after attacking anti-extradition bill demonstrators at a train station, in Hong Kong.
The six men were detained after raids on their homes in Yuen Long and nearby Tin Shui Wai districts -- which are close to the Chinese border -- on Monday, according to the New Territories North Regional Crime Unit.
The suspects include drivers, vendors, renovation workers and the unemployed and police said some had "Triad backgrounds."
Triad is a name given to Hong Kong's organized crime syndicates that make their money through illicit drugs, gambling and prostitution among other activities. It has also become to refer to more loosely organized criminal gangs in the city. Some groups, especially the bigger, more powerful gangs who operate in the rural New Territories villages, wield political power through district councils and other political connections.
Pro-democracy lawmaker Claudia Mo said on Facebook that the scenes in Yuen Long were evident of a "more than apparent collusion between the police and the Triads in that neighborhood."
Police Commissioner Stephen Lo on Monday denied accusations that law enforcement officials were working with gangs hired to attack protesters and said the delay was because police resources were deployed to the main protest site on Hong Kong island, about an hour away from Yuen Long.
"We will investigate whether we were inefficient but we are not related to triads. I ask you to trust the police force. Last night, we were all focusing on Hong Kong island. We needed to regroup for Yuen Long," he said.
Hong Kong's Chief Executive Carrie Lam called such accusations "insulting."

Thugs for hire

But similar claims of collusion were made in 2014, when masked men with alleged links to organized crime attacked Umbrella Movement protesters who had occupied the city's Mong Kok district for weeks. Protesters said police failed to protect them and did not arrest people seen committing violence, a charge the force denied at the time.
In their study "Resurgent Triads? Democratic mobilization and organized crime in Hong Kong," researchers concluded that the 2014 Mong Kok attackers were "low-level Triads affiliates" that were paid to attack the protesters.
The researchers Federico Varese from the University of Oxford and Rebecca WY Wong City University Hong Kong said Triad groups "might have found a new role as enforcer of unpopular policies and repression of democratic protests in the context of a drift towards authoritarianism in Hong Kong."
Professor T Wing Lo, expert in triad societies at City University of Hong Kong, told CNN that the level of organization in the scenes from Sunday suggest it was carried out by by a Triad group.
"But the participants were not all triad members," he said. "Some were just ordinary villagers, some were paid to do a job."
Lo said the group who carried out the attack in Yuen Long would likely have been paid by pro-Chinese authorities.
Hong Kong is teetering on the edge as protests take a darker turn
"All the crime committed by Triads is for money," Lo said. "We call this extralegal governance -- sometimes when governments cannot use the formal law enforcement for whatever reason, they pay for it. This is the normal way to do business."
While police have not confirmed that the incident in Yuen Long was coordinated under the direction of a Triad group, the phenomenon of thugs-for-hire is common across the border in mainland China.
Authorities are known to employ criminals to impose policies or enforce decisions, according to Lynette Ong, Professor of Political Science at the University of Toronto and author of "'Thugs-for-Hire': State Coercion and "Everyday Repression" in China."
"Third-party violence is commonly deployed by the state to evict homeowners and to deal with petitioners and protestors in China," Ong said in her 2015 paper.
That alleged link between Hong Kong Traid groups and mainland Chinese authorities goes back decades.
Following the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989 and some Triad groups offering to help smuggle fleeing democracy leaders, Beijing embarked on a "deliberate strategy to "woo the Triads into the pro-Beijing camp," which included granting business opportunities to leaders in exchange for support in Hong Kong.
"Preparing for the island handover to China in 1997, the Beijing government was worried that Triads societies, and in particular the most powerful Sun Yee On Triad, would side with liberal political activists and destabilize post-1997 Hong Kong," Varese and Wong said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/23/asia/hong-kong-triad-arrests-intl-hnk/index.html

2019-07-23 09:22:00Z
52780335250017

South Korean and Russian warplanes face-off in rare mid-air confrontation - CNN

South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff accused a Russian A-50 command and control military aircraft of twice violating South Korean airspace off the country's eastern coast on Tuesday morning.
The incursion came during what South Koreans officials believe was a joint Russian-Chinese military exercise. Two Chinese H-6 bombers had passed into Seoul's air identification zone just hours before, joined by another two Russian military planes, according to defense officials.
It is the first time a foreign country has violated South Korean airspace, according to the Ministry of National Defense.
The confrontation took place over disputed islands in the East Sea, also known as the Sea of Japan, in the early hours of Tuesday morning.
The two, small islands, known to the Koreans as Dokdo and to the Japanese as Takeshima, are claimed by both countries.
Japan also confirmed it scrambled fighter jets in response to the Russian incursion, Tuesday.
"We confirmed Russia's A50 has invaded Japan's airspace while two of Russian TU-95 bombers and two Chinese H-6 bombers flew around Japan. We took measures against the invasion" said a spokesman for the country's ministry of defense.
The Russian Defense Ministry said that two Tu-95 strategic bombers had carried out a planned flight in the airspace over neutral waters of the Sea of Japan (East Sea), and accused South Korean fighter pilots of acting inappropriately.
"(They) conduced unprofessional maneuvers by crossing the course of Russian strategic missile carriers, threatening their security," the ministry said in a statement Tuesday.
A Beriev A-50 airborne early warning and control training aircraft flies over Moscow during the dress rehearsal of a Victory Day air show.
"South Korean pilots did not contact the crews of Tu-95ms, the F-16 fired a round of flares and carried out a maneuver, moving away from Russian aircraft."
When asked about the incident, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said they weren't aware of the details and referred the question to the Defense Department.

South Korea, Russia point fingers

According to the South Korean military, the Russian A-50 flew above islands claimed by both South Korea and Japan, first at 9.09 a.m. local time and then again at 9.33 a.m., each time for just a matter of minutes.
In response, South Korea deployed F-15F and KF-16 fighter jets, the statement said, and fired 360 warning shots ahead of the Russian aircraft, 80 during the first violation and 280 during the second. The shots were fired using 20mm weapon, according to the Ministry of Defense.
The South Korean military said they also sent out 30 warnings to the Russian plane but received no response. The A-50 is an unarmed AWACS plane, standing for Airborne Warning and Control System, designed for tracking and observation.
South Korea said it was one of two incidents involving Russia Tuesday. According to the country's Joint Chiefs of Staff, two Chinese H-6 bombers entered the Air Defense Identification Zone (KADIZ) at 6.44 a.m. local time and then 7.49 a.m., after which they met up with the two Russian TU-95 bombers. The four planes then entered the KADIZ together at about 8.40 a.m. and remained there for 24 minutes.
Airspace is defined as the area 12 nautical miles from a country's borders, which falls entirely under its control. An ADIZ is an area in which the controlling country demands identification, location and control of aircraft's direction, but doesn't necessarily have any rights of engagement under international law.
South Korea's KADIZ was first established in 1950 and most recently adjusted by Seoul in 2013.
But in their statement, the Russian Ministry of Defense made no mention of the A-50. Instead it accused the South Korean jets of behaving inappropriately towards the two Russian TU-95 bombers who were flying "over neutral waters."
"This is not the first time the South Korean pilots have unsuccessfully tried to prevent Russian aircraft from flying over the neutral waters," the Russian statement said, adding it didn't recognize South Korea's KADIZ.
It also denied that there was any "warning fire," adding if the Russian pilots had felt "any threat to their security, the response would not be long in coming."
South Korean air forces F-15 fly in formation during the media day of the 65th South Korea Armed Forces Day ceremony on September 25, 2017 in Pyeongteak.

War of words

Chung Eui-yong, director of South Korea's National Security Office, said that he had sent a "strong" message of complaint to the Russian authorities over the incident.
"We are taking this situation very seriously, and if this kind of action is repeated, we will take even stronger measures," Chung said, without detailing what those measures could be.
Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the United States' Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, said that shooting a warning shot in the air was "very very serious" and "very, very rare."
Schuster said that the fact shots were fired meant Seoul had viewed the violation as a serious and deliberate act, adding he couldn't explain why the Russian plane would come back again after the first warning.
"Penetrating to a point of requiring warning shots to turn away is normally the result of a deliberate decision to penetrate that airspace," he said.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and South Korea's President Moon Jae-in hold a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka on June 28.
Though East Asia is riven by numerous, long-standing territorial disputes, Russia and South Korea rarely come into conflict.
Top Russian and South Korean leaders at the G20 in Osaka, Japan, in June, where they praised their warming bilateral relations. Russian President Vladimir Putin said South Korea was "one of our key partners" in Asia.
It is the second tense incident involving the Russian military in East Asia in less than two months. On June 8 two vessels from the US and Russia almost collided in the Pacific, coming within 50 feet of each other.
The exact location of the standoff wasn't clear but it was believed to take place in the waters off the coast of China.
Relations between Beijing and Moscow have reached an "unprecedented" peak in the past year, according to Russia's Putin, including growing cooperation between their two militaries.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/23/asia/south-korea-russia-military-intl-hnk/index.html

2019-07-23 09:04:00Z
52780337956008

South Korean and Russian warplanes face-off in rare mid-air confrontation - CNN

South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff accused a Russian A-50 command and control military aircraft of twice violating South Korean airspace off the country's eastern coast on Tuesday morning.
The incursion came during what South Koreans officials believe was a joint Russian-Chinese military exercise. Two Chinese H-6 bombers had passed into Seoul's air identification zone just hours before, joined by another two Russian military planes, according to defense officials.
It is the first time a foreign country has violated South Korean airspace, according to the Ministry of National Defense.
The Russian Defense Ministry said that two Tu-95 strategic bombers had carried out a planned flight in the airspace over neutral waters of the Sea of Japan (East Sea), and accused South Korean fighter pilots of acting inappropriately.
"(They) conduced unprofessional maneuvers by crossing the course of Russian strategic missile carriers, threatening their security," the ministry said in a statement Tuesday.
A Beriev A-50 airborne early warning and control training aircraft flies over Moscow during the dress rehearsal of a Victory Day air show.
"South Korean pilots did not contact the crews of Tu-95ms, the F-16 fired a round of flares and carried out a maneuver, moving away from Russian aircraft."
When asked about the incident, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said they weren't aware of the details and referred the question to the Defense Department.

South Korea, Russia point fingers

The confrontation took place over disputed islands in the East Sea, also known as the Sea of Japan, in the early hours of Tuesday morning.
The two, small islands are known to the Koreans as Dokdo and to the Japanese as Takeshima. They're situated about halfway between both countries.
According to the South Korean military, the Russian A-50 flew above islands claimed by both South Korea and Japan, first at 9.09 a.m. local time and then again at 9.33 a.m., each time for just a matter of minutes.
In response, South Korea deployed F-15F and KF-16 fighter jets, the statement said, and fired 360 warning shots ahead of the Russian aircraft, 80 during the first violation and 280 during the second. The shots were fired using 20mm weapon, according to the Ministry of Defense.
The South Korean military said they also sent out 30 warnings to the Russian plane but received no response. The A-50 is an unarmed AWACS plane, standing for Airborne Warning and Control System, designed for tracking and observation.
South Korea said it was one of two incidents involving Russia Tuesday. According to the country's Joint Chiefs of Staff, two Chinese H-6 bombers entered the Air Defense Identification Zone (KADIZ) at 6.44 a.m. local time and then 7.49 a.m., after which they met up with the two Russian TU-95 bombers. The four planes then entered the KADIZ together at about 8.40 a.m. and remained there for 24 minutes.
Airspace is defined as the area 12 nautical miles from a country's borders, which falls entirely under its control. An ADIZ is an area in which the controlling country demands identification, location and control of aircraft's direction, but doesn't necessarily have any rights of engagement under international law.
South Korea's KADIZ was first established in 1950 and most recently adjusted by Seoul in 2013.
But in their statement, the Russian Ministry of Defense made no mention of the A-50. Instead it accused the South Korean jets of behaving inappropriately towards the two Russian TU-95 bombers who were flying "over neutral waters."
"This is not the first time the South Korean pilots have unsuccessfully tried to prevent Russian aircraft from flying over the neutral waters," the Russian statement said, adding it didn't recognize South Korea's KADIZ.
It also denied that there was any "warning fire," adding if the Russian pilots had felt "any threat to their security, the response would not be long in coming."
South Korean air forces F-15 fly in formation during the media day of the 65th South Korea Armed Forces Day ceremony on September 25, 2017 in Pyeongteak.

War of words

Chung Eui-yong, director of South Korea's National Security Office, said that he had sent a "strong" message of complaint to the Russian authorities over the incident.
"We are taking this situation very seriously, and if this kind of action is repeated, we will take even stronger measures," Chung said, without detailing what those measures could be.
Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the United States' Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, said that shooting a warning shot in the air was "very very serious" and "very, very rare."
Schuster said that the fact shots were fired meant Seoul had viewed the violation as a serious and deliberate act, adding he couldn't explain why the Russian plane would come back again after the first warning.
"Penetrating to a point of requiring warning shots to turn away is normally the result of a deliberate decision to penetrate that airspace," he said.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and South Korea's President Moon Jae-in hold a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka on June 28.
Though East Asia is riven by numerous, long-standing territorial disputes, Russia and South Korea rarely come into conflict.
Top Russian and South Korean leaders at the G20 in Osaka, Japan, in June, where they praised their warming bilateral relations. Russian President Vladimir Putin said South Korea was "one of our key partners" in Asia.
It is the second tense incident involving the Russian military in East Asia in less than two months. On June 8 two vessels from the US and Russia almost collided in the Pacific, coming within 50 feet of each other.
The exact location of the standoff wasn't clear but it was believed to take place in the waters off the coast of China.
Relations between Beijing and Moscow have reached an "unprecedented" peak in the past year, according to Russia's Putin, including growing cooperation between their two militaries.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/23/asia/south-korea-russia-military-intl-hnk/index.html

2019-07-23 08:36:00Z
52780337956008