Rabu, 10 Juli 2019

British ambassador to U.S. resigns after leaked memos showed he criticized Trump - NBC News

LONDON — The British ambassador to the United States resigned Wednesday following leaked memos that showed he had called President Donald Trump "insecure" and "incompetent."

Sir Kim Darroch said in a statement that the fallout from the leaked communications — which sparked a series of broadsides from Trump — was "making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like."

After the secret diplomatic communications were published this weekend, the president responded with a series of unprecedented attacks on the British ambassador and prime minister, historically among Washington's closest allies.

Trump called Darroch "wacky," "very stupid" and a "pompous fool," and suggested he would not be able to do his job in Washington because "we will no longer deal with him." The ambassador was uninvited from a dinner Trump was hosting with the Emir of Qatar.

The president expanded his targets to Prime Minister Theresa May, saying he had been "very critical" of her and the "mess" she had made of her Brexit negotiations.

July 9, 201901:38

Darroch was due to stand down at the end of this year, but he said in a statement issued through the U.K. Foreign Office that the leak had made his position untenable.

"The current situation is making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like," he said. "I believe in the current circumstances the responsible course is to allow the appointment of a new ambassador."

He said the support offered on both sides of the Atlantic had "brought home to me the depth of friendship and close ties between our two countries."

He added that "the professionalism and integrity of the British civil service is the envy of the world. I will leave it full of confidence that its values remain in safe hands."

Prime Minister May said that "it is a matter of great regret that he has felt it necessary to leave his position." In a statement to the House of Commons, she stressed it was important for diplomats to be able to speak their minds and to "defend our values and principles, particularly when they are under pressure"

Simon McDonald, the most senior official at the Foreign Office, spoke on behalf of many experienced officials in Britain who believe that Darroch did nothing wrong in expressing his sincerely held belief about Trump's White House.

"You were the target of a malicious leak, you were simply doing your job," he wrote Wednesday.

The leak presented a dilemma for Britain. Some acknowledged that the messages, and Trump's reaction, would make Darroch's last few months near impossible. But many were also cautious of the U.K. being seen to allow other countries to veto the diplomats posted to their embassies.

"We should never allow any country to dictate who we send as ambassador," Charles Parton, who served as a British diplomat for almost four decades, told NBC News before Darroch's resignation. "It would give enormous power to other countries, so you just can't do it."

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for details.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/british-ambassador-u-s-resigns-after-leaked-memos-showed-he-n1028116

2019-07-10 11:05:00Z
52780329171254

Hong Kong families are feuding as China extradition bill exposes generational fall in living standards - CNN

"You're criticizing my friends, saying we're all radicals, saying we're criminal triads," he says, voice raised, as an older relative gestures for him to sit down. "You dare to call us triads?"
It's an inter-generational spat that has played out in many families across Hong Kong over the past month, as violence and unrest rocked the city. Family WhatsApp chat groups have descended into political shouting matches. Friends and relatives have publicly clashed in Facebook posts.
The family feuds began when the government introduced a controversial bill to allow extradition from Hong Kong to China, and spiraled as record-breaking protests swept the city throughout June. The anger boiled over on July 1, when mostly young protesters stormed and trashed the government headquarters.
  • Uncle If there are always protests, then don't have to work overseas anymore because Hong Kong is being doomed by these bunch of ****!
  • Olivia "Don't have to work overseas" — if this bill gets passed business will be dire so you might not get to work overseas. No business... no business trips.
  • Mom Man, if it weren't for Hong Kongers' unity, all coming out during a life or death moment, the bill would have definitely passed after the second reading and then Hong Kong would definitely be doomed.
  • Uncle If you guys are so worried, you should have immigrated earlier, don't come back to your hometown.
  • Mom It's only because of love for homeland, that people chant to revoke the extradition bill! Do you really think that at 35 degrees C under the burning hot sun, squeezing and walking with 2 million protesters for eight hours is fun?
While a wide spectrum of people oppose or feel conflicted about the bill, and support the broader pro-democracy demands of the July 1 protesters, loose generational lines have emerged.
The more extreme anti-bill, pro-democracy protesters tend to be younger -- millennials and even teenagers -- while the pro-government camp leans toward the older generation.
In some ways, these generational political lines look familiar. Similar divides have been seen regarding the Brexit issue in Britain and the Trump presidency in the United States.
As in those countries, discontent in Hong Kong has been building for years, since the 2014 Umbrella Revolution which called for greater democracy, and perhaps even before.
The extradition bill was simply the last straw, exposing -- and deepening -- a rift in Hong Kong society than runs far deeper than a single piece of law.

The world's most unaffordable housing

Young Hong Kongers belong to one of the most expensive cities in the world, but they can't afford to live in it -- or, at least, not to the same standard they feel their parents' generation could.
Today, Hong Kong is a city where the race for success starts at birth. Top kindergartens and private elementary schools are so competitive that children as young as 3 years old have resumes, padded with artistic and musical achievements, and sports class attendance. Primary and secondary school students spent up to 55 hours a week in class, extra lessons, or studying, according to a 2018 government report.
It doesn't get easier once students hit college. Take 28-year-old Wilson Lau. In 2013, he got his undergraduate degree in quantity surveying from City University of Hong Kong.
China's exam migrants desperate for chance to sit life-changing gaokao
Then, while still paying off his student loans, he juggled a Bachelor of Science program, which he felt was vital for future career advancement, and a full-time job as a quantity surveyor. Many days, he didn't get off work until 9 p.m. or 10 p.m. -- then it was time to hit the books and study for exams.
That first job as a quantity surveyor had a starting monthly salary of $1,670 (HK$13,000) -- compared to an average base salary of $6,335 a month in New York for the same position, according to Glassdoor.
But despite the comparatively lower graduate wages in Hong Kong, rent is higher here than almost anywhere else in the world, according to public policy firm Demographia. With his student loans and low salary, Lau couldn't afford to move out of his parents' home for four or five years after he began working.
As the city's population expands and developable land runs out, housing prices have skyrocketed -- the median price of a home in 2018 was nearly 21 times the city's median annual household income. Hong Kong has gained a reputation for its luxury real estate with staggering price tags -- one house on The Peak, an exclusive neighborhood, is listed for $448 million.
Housing costs have risen so much faster than annual wages that young people feel priced out.
"This generation of young people in Hong Kong, in their 20s, is facing very high pressures in society," said Lau, who attended this month's protests. "Their living expenses are a huge burden. It takes up a huge part of their salaries."
Chan Ka-yan, a 28-year-old administrator at a non-profit organization, shared a relatively cheap apartment with two flatmates after she graduated and started working. But then, her flatmates left Hong Kong, and she had to find a new place on her own.
She ended up in a subdivided flat -- a small apartment split into even smaller rentable rooms. For nine months, she lived in a 100-square-foot room for $576 (HK$4,500) a month. The air conditioner leaked water. The neighboring room, also 100 square feet, had a newborn baby that cried constantly.
"Living there, there were a lot of problems," she said -- but her plight was "pretty common" for a young Hong Konger. She has since moved back in with her parents.
For young people, buying a house seems like an impossibility -- just renting an apartment is difficult enough. As they watch prices rise around them, unable to keep up with meager salaries, a feeling of being stuck has emerged.
That atmosphere is a stark contrast to their parents' generation, when opportunity and upward mobility seemed almost guaranteed.

The older generation "had hope"

The generation that grew up between the 1970s and '90s could "realize their dreams," said Edmund Cheng, deputy director of the public policy research center at Hong Kong Baptist University.
"When we talk about the Hong Kong Dream, it's another iteration of the American Dream -- they work hard and they can get rewarded," said Cheng.
These dreams were attainable in concrete ways, he added. People in the '70s could buy an apartment after working for three to five years, buy a car, and pay off their mortgage within 10 years, according to Cheng, because wages and property prices were more aligned.
For example, Jimz, a 44-year-old Hong Kong resident who declined to give his full name, bought his first home when he was 28 -- a rare feat today. He had no partner or flatmate, earned about $2,560 (HK$20,000) a month, and bought the apartment for about $128,035 (HK$1 million). That same space is now worth five times more, he said.
"Back then, if you were determined to get a house, whether it was subsidized by the government or in the private sector, it was not that unrealistic compared to these days," Jimz said.
The older generation had a few distinct advantages, said Cheng. Public schools meant good education was easily accessible. The opening up of China's economy in 1978 created new jobs for Hong Kong's lawyers, bankers, and industry experts. The population was smaller, housing was cheaper, and other costs like school fees hadn't yet reached today's exorbitant prices.
Then over the years, China became a superpower economy and relied less on Hong Kongers' expertise. More schools privatized, making elite education a luxury for the wealthy. Job competition became fierce -- for instance, Cheng said, to get a high-paying position in finance or tenure at a university, candidates only have a good shot if they attended top universities in the US or UK.
The older generation "had hope, because they could anticipate rising income over the years," said Cheng -- with new opportunities and a flourishing economy, they could expect promotions and pay raises down the line. "But now, Hong Kong's younger generation basically doesn't have this kind of hope," he added.
The wealth divide has also deepened, with low-income families unable to afford the private schools, tutors, and overseas universities that give graduates an edge in the job market.
"The poverty gap is getting wider and wider, even though the government keep saying they're trying to improve," said Venus Wong, 27, who works in marketing and joined the protests in June.
"They (the government) are launching a lot of different policies, but I don't think it actually helps a lot, and the pricing of housing keeps going up."

A question of identity

Stagnant wages and high housing costs are not unique to Hong Kong, but the generational divide here cuts deeper than economic factors. As a semi-autonomous city, Hong Kong itself has a splintered identity -- it is both China, and not.
When Britain handed sovereignty of Hong Kong back to China in 1997, it was agreed that the city would operate under a "one country, two systems" model. As such, Hong Kong has its own legal system, currency, and police force -- as well as historical, cultural, and lifestyle differences to the mainland.
These differences have created a sense of disconnect with China, particularly among young people. Today, the number of people identifying as Hong Kongers rather than Chinese has hit a record high since 1997, according to the Hong Kong University Public Opinion Program.
For some, this disconnect is irreparable. When protesters stormed the Legislative Council (LegCo) on July 1, they spray-painted slogans on the walls, including the phrase, "HK is not China."
Hong Kong protesters stormed the Legislative Council on July 1, 2019, leaving graffiti and umbrellas.
Though some in the older generation also identify as Hong Kongers, many instead identify as Chinese and call China their motherland. After all, a sizable number of their own parents came from China -- in the 1940s, a huge wave of mainland emigrants fled the Chinese Civil War to Hong Kong. From 1946 to 1956, the city's population jumped from 1.55 million to 2.677 million, according to a 1969 report by Hong Kong's Census and Statistics Department.
"To me, I feel Hong Kong is part of China," said Tony Lau, 58, who works in real estate investment and development. "You can't choose your fate -- you can't say, 'I want to be American' or 'I want to be British.' Because of Hong Kong's history, you are a part of China."
He also feels closer to the mainland because, in some ways, he and his peers owe their economic success to China. "When China opened up in 1978, Hong Kong's opportunities came," he said.
As China's economy boomed and transformed the country's global image into one of power and wealth, older Hong Kongers may have felt greater pride toward the mainland, according to Cheng.
The dichotomy between being a Hong Konger and Chinese also encompasses the larger conflict between the two generations' values. Hong Kong has protected freedoms of speech, press, and assembly -- which young protesters guard fiercely and see as fundamental to Hong Kong's DNA.
In recent years, they've clung to these freedoms even more tightly amid a growing mistrust of the government and the perception that China is encroaching on Hong Kong's autonomy.
These fears were fueled by a string of controversies -- like the disqualification of several pro-democracy lawmakers in 2017, and now the extradition bill.
"We thought the LegCo system was our last barrier protecting the rule of Hong Kong, on our own," said Wong, the 27-year-old marketing employee who joined the protests. "But during these years, because of the disqualification of the LegCo members, it felt like we were losing our very last barrier. And we have no way to defend ourselves from China."
Older Hong Kongers often respond in one of several ways. Some are ambivalent toward the pro-democracy rhetoric; some are supportive, but disapprove of the protesters' methods; and some feel that China has been unfairly demonized.
Tony Lau also criticized the young protesters' frequent use of a Union Jack or Hong Kong's colonial-era flag as a symbol for the fight for democracy. His generation had actually lived in colonized Hong Kong, he said, arguing that young people are ignorantly romanticizing Britain as a paragon of democracy.
"People didn't start even talking about democracy until after the handover," said Lau. "In those 155 years of colonization, did they talk about universal suffrage? It was totally a colonial administration."
Millennials like Wong and Wilson Lau disagree -- after all, they were also born before the handover, and witnessed the transfer of sovereignty.
A protester waves a UK flag during a Hong Kong protest on July 7, 2019.
The colonial administration "wasn't a complete or perfect government. But Britain and China, their difference is huge," said Wilson Lau, who added that his colonial-era education taught him the importance of "freedom, the right of speech, liberty."
Almost by definition, revolution threatens stability. In Hong Kong, this tension reveals another deep difference in generational values.
Among older Hong Kongers, a common refrain is that the protesters can do what they like as long as they don't infringe on people's right to daily life -- a line they have long crossed by occupying streets, stopping traffic, and blocking entrances to tax and immigration offices.
The young protesters understand why older Hong Kongers resent the chaos -- but these complaints ring hollow for many who say the present social difficulties were absent in their parents' generation.
"We won't blame the older generation for earning more than us, but the older generation will blame us for pursuing democracy," said Wilson Lau. "I think it's very unfair."

A looming deadline

The conflict has permeated daily Hong Kong life. Across the city, you can hear people talking and arguing about it on public transport, hiking trails and social media.
Amid all this uncertainty and division, a clear and concrete deadline looms. In 2047, Hong Kong will be fully reintegrated with mainland China, as per the terms of the handover agreement.
Some older Hong Kongers such as Tony Lau welcome this date, pointing to the rapid economic development of Chinese megacities like Shenzhen and Shanghai. To reintegrate would open up opportunities and boost Hong Kong's growth, they argue.
Even some moderates and millennials agree. A 26-year-old Hong Konger, who declined to be named for fear of jeopardizing her job, empathized with the protesters -- but said reintegration with China was "set in stone."
Anger in Hong Kong over Beijing's legal jurisdiction in new train station
"You can tell by the infrastructure they built, the bridges that are linking us to the greater Pearl (River) Delta, the high speed rail -- all these transport infrastructure are indicative that it's going to happen," she said. "It's probably time for Hong Kong to really come to terms with that ... We do need to move forward."
It's not that the young protesters don't acknowledge this deadline. On the contrary, the reality of reintegration feels so immediate they say its effects are already visible -- and it scares them on an almost existential level.
"Our generation is feeling like we don't have to wait to 2047 until we're returned to China because, systematically, we're getting closer and closer to China," said Wong.
"We fear that we are becoming part of China, but we don't want to."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/09/asia/hong-kong-divide-intl-hnk/index.html

2019-07-10 08:57:00Z
52780329263927

Iran's 'goodwill gesture' failed to open talks with Washington: report - Fox News

Iran’s release of a Lebanese businessman with U.S. permanent residency two days before the attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman was meant as a “goodwill gesture” in hopes to open up talks with the U.S., three Western sources told Reuters exclusively.

US-IRAN TENSIONS: A TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS

The gesture, however, fell flat with Washington, the report said.

A State Department official told Reuters that if Iran wanted to reduce tension and engage with the U.S., it should have released one of the “innocent American citizens” it is currently holding hostage. That “humanitarian” gesture would have yielded better results, the official said.

Iran released Nizar Zakka, a Washington-based information technology expert, on June 11, four years after he was arrested. His company, IJMA3, is funded by private organizations and governments, including the United States.

Zakka’s release was, therefore, a “missed opportunity,” one source told Reuters. “We should have explored whether there was something there.” Another source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that Iran released Zakka as a way to deescalate tensions “from their side” and expected the U.S. to reciprocate in some way.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In the month since his release, tensions between Iran and the West have continued to escalate. Iran downed a U.S. drone, the U.S. upped sanctions on the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader. British forces recently captured an Iranian supertanker headed for Syria.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/us/irans-good-will-gesture-to-release-lebanese-tech-businessman-failed-to-open-talks-with-washington-report

2019-07-10 08:51:39Z
52780329834369

Selasa, 09 Juli 2019

Hong Kong's Carrie Lam Says Extradition Bill Is 'Dead,' But Protesters Press On - NPR

Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam said Tuesday the effort to amend an extradition bill was dead, but it wasn't clear if the legislation was being withdrawn as protesters have demanded. Vincent Yu/AP hide caption

toggle caption
Vincent Yu/AP

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam said on Tuesday the extradition bill that prompted weeks of street demonstrations is "dead," admitting that the government's handling of it was a "total failure."

The measure would have allowed people in Hong Kong to be sent to mainland China to face trials in courts controlled by the Communist Party, sparking fears of politically-motivated prosecutions targeting outspoken critics of China.

The backlash to the bill has prompted the most serious challenge to the Beijing-controlled government of Hong Kong since the former British colony was returned to China in 1997.

In mid-June Lam responded to huge protests by suspending the bill, but that move failed to mollify critics, who continued to demonstrate against the bill and call for Lam's resignation.

And in the face of Lam's declaration, Hong Kong protesters leaders are not satisfied, saying the bill should be formally withdrawn.

Pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong wrote on Twitter that Lam telling the country the bill is dead is a "ridiculous lie," since she did not invoke federal powers necessarily to really kill the bill. Plus, Wong said the Hong Kong leader has not committed to not re-introducing the bill at a later date, which protesters are demanding.

Activists like Wong are also urging Lam for an independent investigation into some of the forceful tactics Hong Kong police used against demonstrators, which by some estimates reached around 2 million people at the height of the protests. Riot police used tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannons to disperse crowds blocking roads.

Angry demonstrators hurled bricks and bottles in the clashes with police that Lam at one point called "organized riots."

But on Tuesday, Lam said those who object to the extradition bill have nothing to fear.

She said she realizes there are "lingering doubts about the government's sincerity or worries about whether it would re-start the process in the legislative council," yet, she emphasized: "There is no such plan. The bill is dead."

Under Hong Kong's "one country, two systems" formula of government, the territory retains freedoms not enjoyed in mainland China. Demonstrators fearing an erosion of those freedoms and are talking of extending their protests.

Police are still searching for suspects who disrupted the 22nd anniversary of the city's handover from Britain to China, storming he Legislative Council and vandalizing the property.

Hong Kong demonstrator Katherine, 26, who only agreed to talk if her last name was not revealed, told NPR's Julie McCarthy, that the destruction of the property paled in comparison to what she claims the government is trying to destroy: the rights of Hong Kong people.

China, she said, is not the enemy.

"But they are someone hindering our development, hindering our evolution to a more civilized society," she said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/07/09/739780546/hong-kongs-carrie-lam-says-extradition-bill-is-dead-but-protesters-press-on

2019-07-09 11:09:00Z
52780327996319

Protesters firm as HK says extradition bill 'dead' - Al Jazeera English

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwg6cXHUKTg

2019-07-09 10:54:37Z
52780327996319

Hong Kong leader says China extradition bill is ‘dead’ but declines to withdraw it - The Washington Post

HONG KONG — Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam on Tuesday said a bill that would allow extraditions to mainland China is effectively “dead” and conceded that her government’s work on the issue was a “complete failure,” responding to sustained public anger over a proposal that sparked massive protests in the city over recent weeks. 

Still, she declined to formally withdraw the bill from the legislative agenda or meet protesters’ other demands, such as an independent inquiry into police use of force in quelling demonstrations. 

The Hong Kong government has “put a stop to” the legislative process around the bill, she said, dismissing fears that the legislature will restart the process at a later date.

“I reiterate here, there is no such plan,” she said. “The bill is dead.” 

The battle over the extradition bill has posed a serious test of Lam’s leadership — and a challenge for Beijing — as Hong Kongers have publicly resisted what many here perceived as an attack on the territory’s cherished freedoms and autonomy. Protesters have occupied major roads and confronted riot police in a series of clashes.

[Hong Kong leader offers apology after second massive march against extradition proposal]

The crisis has exposed deep concerns about the Hong Kong government’s legitimacy and worries over Beijing’s increasing control of the financial hub.

 Lam said her decision to suspend rather than withdraw the bill and her refusal to meet other demands have “nothing to do with my own pride or arrogance.” Instead, they are “practical” responses that will allow Hong Kong to move ahead, she said.

 She appealed for Hong Kongers to trust her administration.

“Give us the time and room for us to take Hong Kong out of the current impasse,” Lam said.

Her comments Tuesday were the first since she held a 4 a.m. news conference after protesters occupied Hong Kong’s legislature on the anniversary of the former British colony’s 1997 handover to China.

The swelling movement in Hong Kong has grown to encompass a widespread sentiment that the territory’s government does not work for its people but exists to advance an agenda set by Beijing. Lam has said that her government will work to seek out voices of the young, who have driven the most radical protest tactics in recent weeks, and reiterated her promise for a more open style of governance.

[Protesters storm Hong Kong streets over China extradition bill]

Other pro-Beijing voices have acknowledged that an end to Hong Kong’s recurring political crises — another erupted in 2014 over calls for universal suffrage — would not be possible without an overhaul of the political system. The city’s leader is selected by a 1,200-person committee out of a pool of candidates approved by Beijing, and only half of its 70-seat legislature is directly elected.

“The government needs a radical shake-up, both in its mind-set, and its policies and systems, or Hong Kong’s days as a vibrant, and above all, safe, city of Asia will be numbered,” wrote Regina Ip, a pro-Beijing lawmaker and member of Hong Kong’s cabinet, in an opinion piece for the South China Morning Post newspaper. 

Lam detailed no such changes Tuesday, but she acknowledged that both the extradition-bill protests and the 2014 pro-democracy demonstrations have exposed rifts in Hong Kong society.

“This time, I don’t think we could continue to ignore those fundamental and deep-seated problems,” she said.

Like her predecessors, Lam has become emblematic of the problem for many who have taken to the streets in Hong Kong, angered by her responses to the discord. At one point, she compared governing to parenting and said she could not give in to her son’s demands every time. Those comments prompted chants during rallies of “Carrie Lam is not my mother!” 

The chief executive has declined to step down, but on Tuesday she reiterated an earlier public apology. 

“I have tendered my most sincere apology for the disturbances and tensions and confrontations caused by our work,” she said, later adding that she has the “passion and the sense of duty to serve the Hong Kong people.” 

[For China, a growing conundrum: What to do about Hong Kong?]

Bonnie Leung, a leader of the Civil Human Rights Front, a group that planned some of the protests, said Lam’s comments were not new and did not meet demands.

“The same thing being said over and over again doesn’t make it any better or mean anything more,” she said.

In Hong Kong, withdrawing a bill that has already been planned for the legislative agenda involves a separate legal process.

“However, she only said the bill is ‘dead.’ We cannot find the word ‘dead’ in any of the laws in Hong Kong, or in any legal proceedings in the Legislative Council,” Leung added, referring to the city’s lawmaking body.

Joshua Wong, a prominent young activist, added in a tweet that Lam’s declaration was a “ridiculous lie.”

“The crux does not lie in the word play, whether ‘suspend’ or ‘withdraw,’ I think the key is whether she would promise not to initiate the bill again during her term,” he wrote. “She has to make it clear.”

Read more

Why protesters rage on, even though they cannot win

Masks, cash and apps: How Hong Kong protesters find ways to outwit the surveillance state

Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/hong-kong-leader-says-china-extradition-bill-is-dead-but-not-fully-withdrawn/2019/07/09/edf2ec2e-a1ef-11e9-a767-d7ab84aef3e9_story.html

2019-07-09 10:30:00Z
52780327996319

Hong Kong extradition bill 'is dead' says Carrie Lam - BBC News

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam has said the controversial bill that would have allowed extradition to the Chinese mainland "is dead".

In a press conference on Tuesday, Ms Lam said the government's work on the bill had been a "total failure".

But she stopped short of saying it had been withdrawn completely, as protesters have been demanding.

The bill sparked weeks of unrest in the city and the government had already suspended it indefinitely.

"But there are still lingering doubts about the government's sincerity or worries whether the government will restart the process in the Legislative Council," Ms Lam told reporters.

"So I reiterate here, there is no such plan. The bill is dead."

She had previously said the bill "will die" in 2020 when the current legislative term ends.

Will this be enough?

By Rupert Wingfield-Hayes, BBC News, Hong Kong

Carrie Lam's statement certainly sounds emphatic, especially in English. "The bill is dead" doesn't leave much room for quibbling. But she has stopped short of the protesters actual demand - that the widely reviled extradition bill be immediately withdrawn.

Instead she is committing herself to allowing the bill to remain in limbo until the current legislatives session ends - and then it will die by default.

The aim appears clear. The huge street protests in Hong Kong have now continued for a month. On Sunday more than 100,000 people took to the streets again. Even the leaders of pro-Beijing political parties have started to question the fitness of Ms Lam's administration, and the ineptitude of her response.

So Ms Lam has again been forced to back down, and to admit that her government's attempt to pass the extradition bill has been a "complete failure". The question now is will it be enough.

"The bill is dead is a political description and it is not legislative language," Civic Party lawmaker Alvin Yeung told the BBC, adding that the bill is still in the process of second reading technically.

"We have no idea why the chief executive refuses to adopt the word withdraw," he added.

One of the leading figures of the protest movement, student activist Joshua Wong, reiterated the demand for the bill to be "formally withdrawn" and accused Ms Lam of using wordplay to "lie to the people of Hong Kong".

Critics of the legislation argue it would undermine the territory's judicial independence and could be used to target those who speak out against the Chinese government.

Hong Kong, a former British colony, is part of China but run under a "one country, two systems" arrangement that guarantees it a level of autonomy.

It has its own judiciary and a separate legal system from mainland China.

Demonstrations continued even after the government had suspended the proposed bill in mid-June, with several protests turning violent.

On 1 July protesters forced their way into the central chamber of Hong Kong's parliament after an hours-long siege.

Many of the demonstrators are also calling for Ms Lam to step down, and for police not to prosecute those arrested during the protests.

In the most recent street protests, thousands took to the streets on 7 July in an area popular with mainland Chinese tourists, in a bid to explain their concerns over the bill.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-48917796

2019-07-09 05:23:22Z
52780327996319