Senin, 24 Juni 2019

Erdogan Faces Fallout After His Party’s Loss in Istanbul Mayor’s Race - The New York Times

ISTANBUL — President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey was confronting recriminations within his governing party and the wider circle of his supporters on Monday as the scale of the defeat of his candidate in the Istanbul mayoral race became clear.

The opposition candidate, Ekrem Imamoglu, emerged as the landslide winner of the mayoral election redo against Mr. Erdogan’s candidate, Binali Yildirim, according to preliminary results announced on Monday by Sadi Guven, the head of the High Election Council, confirming a significant defeat for the governing party.

Mr. Erdogan will now have his hands full in containing the fallout from the electoral defeat, the biggest of his political career, which came after his disastrous decision to push for a rerun of the mayoral election following Mr. Imamoglu’s victory in the first vote, in March.

The loss was a stinging one for Mr. Erdogan. Istanbul is his hometown, and his Justice and Development Party, or A.K.P., has dominated the city for 25 years, but anger over his decision to pursue a new vote and frustration over a weakening economy took their toll, even as he has sought to crack down on the opposition.

“Earthquake at the ballot box,” ran the front-page headline of Karar newspaper, which was founded by three years ago by journalists who had once been close to the A.K.P. government.

[For President Erdogan, the bill for Turkey’s debt-fueled growth is coming due.]

In the election, held on Sunday, Mr. Imamoglu won with 54 percent of the vote, compared with 45 percent for his opponent, Mr. Guven said. The margin of victory for Mr. Imamoglu was larger than in the March election — he won by over 800,000 votes, compared with a slim, 13,000-vote victory in the first ballot — as was turnout, up one percentage point, at 84 percent.

The official results will be announced after a period for any complaints to be submitted and examined, but for now, the margin of victory was taken by commentators and politicians on all sides as a sign of voter outrage at the second vote.

“Slap of the people,” Evrensel, a leftist newspaper that is frequently critical of Mr. Erdogan, announced on its front page. “Istanbul made its choice,” ran the headlines in three main pro-government newspapers.

Complaints had already been building within Mr. Erdogan’s party after its loss in the March election and the subsequent cancellation of that vote.

Political analysts said Mr. Erdogan was likely to take a lower profile at home in the immediate aftermath of the defeat.

Image
CreditKemal Aslan/Reuters

“The big question is: Will he ultimately stick to the ultranationalist alliance and continue the paranoid security state or reverse course and attempt at reform?” said Asli Aydintasbas, a senior fellow with the European Council on Foreign Relations.

The largest challenge for Mr. Erdogan is a movement led by a former A.K.P. president, Abdullah Gul, and a former finance minister, Ali Babacan, to form a breakaway party. Both men support many of the ideals of the A.K.P., notably conservative pro-market policies with social support for the party’s lower-income political base.

Mr. Erdogan is likely to seek some changes, in part to weaken any challenge from the breakaway group, but that could destabilize his alliance with Devlet Bahceli and the Nationalist Movement Party, which he has relies on to secure the presidency and a majority in Parliament.

The Istanbul mayor’s race may seem relatively unimportant in the context of a national leader, but the stakes — and the risks — for Mr. Erdogan going forward are high, because his party has relied on financing from supporters in the business world and companies that have benefited from municipal contracts.

Now, not only has Mr. Erdogan lost access to that source, but Mr. Imamoglu will have access to records that seem likely to detail potentially embarrassing cronyism and wasteful spending that have benefited the president’s supporters.

Mr. Imamoglu got a taste of it during the 17 days he spent in office before he was forced to step aside during the election rerun. In that time, he discovered that Istanbul, Turkey’s economic capital, had dozens of cars at the mayor’s disposal and millions budgeted for officials’ homes, even as the city was sinking into debt.

In addition, the Istanbul municipality paid millions of dollars to charitable foundations run by members of Mr. Erdogan’s family last year, Turkish newspapers have reported.

Pro-government columnists are already moving to divert the mood, writing in the morning newspapers that Mr. Erdogan would turn to foreign policy to enhance his image. That suggested that far from tempering his stance after such a defeat, the president may project a more combative attitude in discussions abroad.

The pro-government newspaper, Aksam, had Turkey’s dispute with the United States over its purchase of the Russian S400 missile system as its lead story, with a headline that read “S400s a matter of sovereignty.”

“Today the most common feeling among the people is the betrayal by their historical allies, the U.S., France, the U.K. and Germany,” Hakki Ocal wrote in the pro-government Daily Sabah. Picking up the campaign slogan of the new mayor, he wrote, “Turkey has risen up this beautiful morning, believing everything will be all right, and turns a watchful eye to its region.”

Mr. Erdogan is likely to proceed with his purchase of the Russian S400 missile system despite American objections, said Ms. Aydintasbas, in the hopes that President Trump will soften the blow by waiving sanctions or choosing the least harsh sanctions.

Image
CreditChris Mcgrath/Getty Images

“Trump is the wild card in this equation, and he may end up giving the Turkish leader the compromise he seeks,” she said.

Within Europe, Mr. Erdogan — who has fired, purged and arrested tens of thousands of people since a failed coup in 2016 — would have to release some of the political prisoners being held in Turkey in order to improve relation, Ms. Aydintasbas said.

Business leaders have also advised Mr. Erdogan that the release of detained journalists and civil society activists would smooth ties the European Union, said Bahadir Kaleagasi, the secretary general of Tusiad, an association of Turkish industry and businesses, in a recent interview.

One of the most prominent political prisoners, Osman Kavala, a philanthropist who is often described as the George Soros of Turkey, went on trial Monday after 19 months in detention. He is accused of trying to overthrow the government for supporting the popular protests in Taksim Square in 2013.

One of the most strident voices in the presidential circle, the columnist Hilal Kaplan, signaled that the political fight for Turkey was by no means over.

The A.K.P. alliance may have lost Istanbul and several of Turkey’s biggest big cities to the opposition People’s Republican Party, or C.H.P., she reminded readers, but it won presidential and parliamentary elections last year and general municipal elections in March with 52 to 54 percent of the vote.

“Moving forward, we will watch the C.H.P. leadership trying to overcome the challenges of being in charge and governing with a multitude of partners,” she wrote. “We will also see how the A.K. Party will perform as Istanbul’s opposition party.”

Anger among A.K.P. members and former supporters of the party at the electoral disaster was evident on social media.

Kemal Ozturk, a former columnist for the pro-government Yeni Safak newspaper who is well-connected in government circles, said the self-interest of the circle around Mr. Erdogan had come back to hurt them.

“They did such vile things as they considered everything permissible for their small interests that they stained, they damaged a huge community’s religion, cause and faith,” he posted on Twitter. “This is the real thing we should be enraged about. Losing Istanbul is small in comparison to that.”

Mustafa Yeneroglu, an A.K.P. lawmaker, posted on Twitter that, “We lost the moral superiority.”

“We can again be the hope as we do sincere self-criticism,” he wrote. “For that, we should give up the past and the myths and look to the future and the dreams of the youth; focus on rationality, superiority of the law, separation of powers and fundamental rights.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/24/world/europe/erdogan-istanbul-turkey-mayor.html

2019-06-24 11:37:30Z
52780318491098

Istanbul mayoral vote: Is ‘disastrous’ loss beginning of Erdogan’s end? - BBC News

As the scale of Ekrem Imamoglu's victory became clear, his supporters thronged his election headquarters. Lining the street outside was a row of cameras. Among them: Turkey's state broadcaster TRT, heavily under the thumb of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

A woman approached, waving her Turkish flag bearing the face of Mr Imamoglu at the TRT cameraman. "Now are you going to film us?", she cried, "we're here, now show we are!"

It encapsulated the feeling of an opposition that has been stifled for years, all the organs of the Turkish state controlled by Turkey's powerful, polarising leader. Finally, the other side of this country feels as though the hand that has covered its mouth has been unclasped.

Rarely is a local election of such national importance. But Mr Erdogan has built his political career over twenty-five years on a sense of victory and an aura of invincibility.

He was born in Istanbul, he ran it as mayor and it propelled him to power first as Prime Minister in 2003 and then President eleven years later.

He has towered over an opposition that long been hopelessly divided. And he has thrived on seeming unchallengeable.

Accruing ever more power through the devotion of his pious, conservative supporters, he has transformed Turkey economically and socially, every area from media to construction filled with loyalists who backed him in return for favours.

A 'disastrous miscalculation'

When his AK Party (AKP) lost Istanbul in March this year by a sliver - just 13,000 votes - the electoral board was widely seen as buckling under the government's pressure for a re-run, based on dubious claim of irregularities.

"Whoever wins Istanbul, wins Turkey", said the country's omnipotent President, assuming this was once again a gamble he would win. It was a disastrous miscalculation.

Mr Imamoglu won by a landslide - the largest in a mayoral election here in 35 years. Conservative areas of the city - Fatih (Istanbul's pious heart by the Blue Mosque), Tuzla (the constituency of the government candidate Binali Yildrim) and Uskudar (where President Erdogan himself lives) all backed Mr Imamoglu. How did he achieve it?

Media playback is unsupported on your device

The answer is in one word, plastered over his posters: umut (hope).

The AKP called him everything they could think of: terrorist, coup-supporter, fraud, Greek, even equating him with the Egyptian autocrat President Sisi, an arch rival of President Erdogan. He rebuffed the smears with smiles.

Vowing to embrace his opponents, he has pushed his message of an inclusive Turkey and a greener, fairer Istanbul, freed of the corruption and nepotism that have built up over 25 years of conservative rule.

During the 18 days when he ran the city after the last vote before it was annulled, his team uncovered a deficit of almost $4bn (£3.1bn), largely due to state tenders linked to President Erdogan's family.

His victory could have a seismic impact here.

Is this the beginning of the end for Erdogan?

The opposition finally feels it's capable of winning - and will channel that through to the next national elections. Those are, for now, due in 2023 but are widely expected to come earlier after the AKP's crushing defeat.

Vultures are already circling, with Mr Erdogan's predecessor as President preparing to launch a breakaway party, as is a former Prime Minister. That will bleed support from the President's now-declining voter base.

As Mr Erdogan's authoritarianism has grown, his inner circle has shrunk. He does not have an obvious heir - his son-in-law, the current Finance Minister, has little of his charisma. The party he founded and has built up could be crippled without him.

Whispers will now grow louder about the beginning of President Erdogan's end. But even if it comes - and nobody here underestimates his ability to bounce back - unpicking a quarter of a century of Erdoganism would take far longer.

Turkish society has been battered over recent years, the country plummeting in indexes of press freedom, judicial independence and human rights. But the one thing the opposition clung on to for dear life was free elections.

They partied late into the night here, celebrating victory - but also the fact that there is still life in Turkish democracy.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-48744733

2019-06-24 10:46:22Z
52780318491098

Tory leadership race: Sky set to cancel Johnson-Hunt debate - BBC News

Sky News has said it will be forced to cancel a debate between the two men vying to be the next Tory leader unless Boris Johnson agrees to take part.

The broadcaster hoped to be the first to stage a head-to-head debate between Mr Johnson and his rival Jeremy Hunt.

But it said Mr Johnson had "so far declined" its invitation and the event would not go ahead without him.

Mr Johnson has faced three days of questions over his private life after a row with his partner Carrie Symonds.

The former foreign secretary has declined to comment on the nature of the argument in Ms Symonds' London home, which led to the police being called early on Friday morning.

He has also been accused of avoiding media scrutiny more generally, particularly on his Brexit policy.

'Curtain twitchers'

Allies of Mr Johnson have stepped up their attacks on Ms Symonds' neighbours, Tom Penn and Eve Leigh, for recording part of the argument and sharing it with the Guardian newspaper, suggesting their actions were "politically motivated".

Jacob Rees-Mogg, the leader of the European Research Group of Brexiteers, described the couple as "Corbynista curtain twitchers".

The couple have insisted they were motivated solely by concerns for the welfare of Ms Symonds after reportedly hearing raised voices and plates and glasses being smashed.

Mr Johnson remains the frontrunner in the contest to succeed Theresa May, with 160,000 or so Conservative Party members choosing their next leader by the end of July.

Mr Hunt has challenged him to a series of live TV debates over the next 10 days.

But Sky's planned debate on Tuesday now looks unlikely to go ahead.

"Jeremy Hunt has agreed to take part, but Boris Johnson has so far declined the invitation," the broadcaster said in a statement.

"We stand ready to host a debate tomorrow evening if both candidates make themselves available," it said. "Without both candidates, tomorrow's debate will not take place."

'Just cynical'

Mr Johnson has agreed to take part in a one-on-one debate with Mr Hunt on ITV on 9 July, which will take place after Tory members have started receiving ballot papers.

The two men are also taking part in a series of TV hustings for Tory members across the UK.

Mr Johnson and Mr Hunt took part in a five-way debate earlier in the leadership contest on the BBC last week, but Mr Johnson refused to join a similar event on Channel 4.

Responding to the Sky announcement, a spokesman for Mr Hunt's campaign said: 'Whoever wants to be prime minister must face up now to the intense scrutiny that comes with the job, anything less is deeply disrespectful to our members.

"Trying to duck debates and run down the clock until after postal ballots have been returned is just cynical and complacent. Boris Johnson must stop trying to slink into No 10 through the back door and come clean about his programme for government."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48744724

2019-06-24 10:30:23Z
52780317750842

Iranian official warns more US spy drones can be blown out of the sky - Fox News

Wake up with Fox News’ newsletter to get the most recent updates on Iran in your morning inbox: Click here

An Iranian military official said Monday that Tehran is capable of shooting down more American spy drones as tensions between the two countries continue to simmer, according to a report out of the country.

Rear. Adm. Hossein Khanzadi, Iran's naval chief, said Iran can deliver another “crushing response … and the enemy knows it," according to the semi-official Tasnim news agency.

IRAN LIKELY AT 'INFLECTION POINT,' LAUNCHING ATTACKS TO CHANGE 'STATUS QUO,' DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY DIRECTOR TELLS FOX NEWS

Trump called off military strikes against Tehran after Iranians shot down a US surveillance drone, which was valued at over $100 million.

Iran claimed that the drone was flying over its airspace at the time of the shooting. Washington insisted that the drone was over international waters.

In an interview on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” Trump said that he did not think the potential loss of life in Iran was “proportionate to shooting down an unmanned drone.”

TRUMP'S NEW SANCTIONS COULD DEAL BLOW 'RIGHT TO THE HEART' OF IRANIAN ECONOMY, REP. TURNER SAYS

Instead of a military strike, the president noted that his administration plans to ratchet up the already hefty sanctions on Iran. Trump is prepared to announce new sanctions on the country on Monday. 

Trump expressed his willingness to open talks with Iranian officials without any preconditions – saying that he doesn’t want a war with the Islamic Republic, but if it comes down to an armed conflict it will be “obliteration like you've never seen before.”

The Associated Press and Fox News’ Andrew O’Reilly contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iran-issues-new-threat-of-downing-more-us-drones

2019-06-24 08:38:01Z
52780320012497

For Erdogan, the Bill for Turkey’s Debt-Fueled Growth Comes Due - The New York Times

The shocking rebuke of Turkey’s governing party in Sunday’s mayoral election in Istanbul resonated as more than a yearning for new leadership in the nation’s largest city. It signaled mounting despair over the economic disaster that has befallen the nation under the strongman rule of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Through the course of a 16-year run as Turkey’s supreme leader, Mr. Erdogan has time and again delivered on his promises of potent economic growth. Yet not unlike an athlete who puts up record-shattering numbers through performance-enhancing drugs, he has produced expansion by resorting aggressively to debt. He has unleashed credit to his cronies in the real estate and construction industries, who have filled the horizons with monumental infrastructure projects.

The bill has come due. Over the last two years, financiers have taken note of the staggering debt burdens confronting Turkey’s major companies and grown fearful of the increasingly dubious prospects for full repayment. Investors have yanked their money out of the country, sending the value of Turkey’s currency, the lira, plunging by more than 40 percent against the American dollar.

The result is inflation running at an annual rate of about 19 percent, besieging ordinary people and companies alike. Farmers are stuck paying sharply higher prices for imported fertilizer and fuel for their tractors. Families are paying more for vegetables and eggs. Factories are paying extra for imported components like electronics and parts. The official unemployment rate exceeds 14 percent.

Of gravest concern, the companies that enabled Mr. Erdogan’s construction bonanza have watched their balance sheets deteriorate with the fall in the lira. Much of their debt is priced in dollars, meaning their burden expands as the Turkish currency loses value. Most of their revenues are in lira, a potentially lethal mismatch that threatens insolvency.

Image
CreditSergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

Turkey was staring at some $328 billion worth of medium and long-term debt in foreign currencies, most of that in dollars, as of the end of 2018, according to official data. Private companies were responsible for about two-thirds. Private companies owed another $138 billion in foreign currency debt payable in the next year.

Given that Turkey’s overall economic production was about $766 billion last year, these debts are enormous. They have given Turkey claim on an unwanted distinction: Only Argentina looks to be at greater risk of descending into a full-blown crisis.

More than economic factors explain the deepening dismay over Mr. Erdogan’s tenure. Having cultivated power by diminishing the role of the military in national life, enabling Muslims to practice their faith free of a state-enforced mode of secularism, he has in recent years attacked democratic institutions by crushing dissent, seizing the property of his enemies and muzzling the press.

In opting to entrust the main opposition party, the People’s Republican Party, with control of Istanbul — the city where Mr. Erdogan’s political career began a quarter-century ago — voters appeared to be expressing general unhappiness with this means of governance.

But the common denominator in Turkish life, the factor that cuts across traditional political divides, is the uncomfortably decisive force of economic decline.

Image
CreditSergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

“Inflation is so high, and real wages are falling, and people are thinking they have to save their money instead of spending,” said Nafez Zouk, lead emerging markets economist at Oxford Economics in London. “They have lost faith in their currency and their spending power.”

Turkey is endowed with formidable economic strengths — a relatively young population of about 80 million, a growing middle class, a location at the crossroads of Europe and Asia and glorious scenery underpinning a major tourism industry.

But Turkey has long been dependent on imported goods and cash borrowed in foreign currency, making the drop in the lira especially painful.

The economy descended into recession over the last half of 2018. Modest growth resumed during the first three months of 2019, as the economy expanded by 1.3 percent compared to the previous quarter. But most economists viewed that as a temporary phenomenon, the result of public spending that Mr. Erdogan delivered to boost fortunes ahead of local elections in late March.

The fundamental situation appears grim, with no clear path toward better days.

The central bank has maintained short-term interest rates at 24 percent to prevent more money from heading for the exits. High interest rates entice investors with enhanced rewards for accepting the risk of keeping their cash in Turkey.

Image
CreditSergey Ponomarev for The New York Times

But high rates also make borrowing more expensive for Turkish businesses and consumers, depressing sales of cars, discouraging new ventures and constraining economic activity in general.

Mr. Erdogan has famously railed against high interest rates as the supposed cause of inflation, which is something like blaming sobriety for the smashed furniture left in the wake of the last boozy bender, and has called for them to fall to get growth back on track. His installation of his son-in-law as paramount economic overseer last year damaged what meager confidence remained in the independence of Turkey’s central bank.

Mr. Erdogan could use his powers to engineer a reduction in interest rates, sending another surge of credit through the economy and — at least for a time — making businesses feel better about their prospects. He could add to the festivities with government spending, taking advantage of Turkey’s still officially low levels of public debt.

But that would invite another drop in the lira while further denting faith in Turkey’s economic stewardship. The result would be more inflation, exacerbating the pressures on consumers and businesses.

Or Mr. Erdogan can accept what he has long rejected as intolerable — much lower growth rates than the 6 and 7 percent a year to which he has become accustomed, perhaps muddling through as the corporate sector finds its way to solvency.

The verdict in Istanbul’s mayoral election suggests that the people of Turkey’s largest city are not crazy about their choices, and not reassured by the man in charge of the country.

International markets appeared pleased by the likelihood of a weakened Erdogan, with the lira climbing modestly as trading began on Monday. Those in control of money have apparently lost trust in the Turkish president and relish the prospect that another party is seizing some of the economic levers.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/24/business/turkey-erdogan-istanbul-election-economy-inflation.html

2019-06-24 07:01:06Z
52780318491098

'Get Israel off our backs': Palestinians react to Kushner plan - Al Jazeera English

Analysts have rebuked the economic part of the United States's Middle East peace plan for failing to address the main problem that has heavily curbed the Palestinian economy - the 52-year-old Israeli military occupation over the Palestinian territories.

The economic plan was released by the White House on Saturday and is set to be presented during a US-led workshop in Bahrain on June 25-26.

When the document was released, many noticed that the 40-page plan was void of any political context with the words "occupation", "freedom", "equality", "blockade" missing.

"The absence of those words is actually quite glaring and it's very indicative of what they see is the issue," Diana Buttu a Haifa-based analyst and former legal adviser to Palestinian peace negotiators told Al Jazeera.

"They've put together this optimal, pie-in-the-sky plan that any person who's involved in economic development would love to see. But it's not applicable to Palestine because they've taken away the political context."

At the heart of the plan is a proposed $50bn investment fund which would be split between Palestinians in the occupied territories (more than half of the total amount) and its neighbours Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan.

The fund will be used for 179 infrastructure and business projects, including building up the Palestinians' tourism sector.

However, it doesn't address the obstacles to freedom of movement that Palestinians face, living under the 12-year Israeli-Egyptian blockade on the Gaza Strip, or under occupation in the West Bank, surrounded by illegal Israeli settlements, deeming it a non-starter for many across the board.

The Palestinian Authority, which exercises limited rule in some areas of the West Bank, and Hamas, which governs Gaza, have both staunchly rejected the plan.

"Is Israel ever going to allow for the movement of goods? No. Is Israel going to allow this plan to be implemented? No. Can there be economic development under occupation? Again, the answer is no," Buttu said.

Many have lamented that the plan recycled old ideas such as the proposed $5bn transportation corridor which would connect the occupied West Bank to the besieged Gaza Strip.

The idea for a transportation corridor first emerged around 2005, when the RAND research organisation proposed to build "The Arc" rail line joining Gaza with other cities in the West Bank, intended to form Palestinian congruity and create conditions for economic growth and population growth.

The project never materialised due to complications.

'Cruelly ironic'

"[Kushner's economic plan] a mish-mash of old ideas, not anything new. [The plan] was portrayed as a fresh new perspective, which is simply not the case," Yara Hawari, a Palestine policy fellow at Al-Shabaka told Al Jazeera.

"You'll notice that the pitches they use in the plan are pitches from people from USAID programs, the very programs that the Trump administration cut, which is cruelly ironic.

"Convincing Palestinians of this is basically convincing them to take economic incentives in exchange for their rights," Hawari said.

A UN report in 2016 found that the economy of the occupied Palestinian territories might reach twice its size if the illegal Israeli military occupation was lifted.

"Occupation imposes a heavy cost" the report read citing Israeli "restrictions on the movement of people and goods; systematic erosion and destruction of the productive base; losses of land, water and other natural resources", as some of the impediments disrupting the territories' growth.

Palestinians haven't had full sovereign control over their economy due to a fragmented domestic market and separation from international markets, the blockade on Gaza, expansion of illegal Israel settlements, construction of the separation barrier on Palestinian territory and the isolation of East Jerusalem, the report stated.

170706060337109

Under international law, Israel as an occupier is obliged to foster economic development for Palestinians, whose territory it occupies.

Palestine's economy isn't faltering because of a lack of investments, but due to the occupation, analysts say.

"[The plan is] a list of all the things that we've been working on for the past 25 years and they have failed because of Israel's military occupation which this economic plan totally ignores, as if it doesn't exist," analyst Sam Bahour told Al Jazeera.

"We don't need an economic workshop to point to us to great projects [that can help] the Palestinian economy. We already know what those are. What we need to look at is how we can remove the restrictions that have been placed on us by Israel with the total support of the US," Bahour said.

In a blog post, Bahour has listed101 actions Israel can take to reduce tension created by occupation on the ground, yet the economic plan includes ideas such as a new university and bringing "5G telecommunications services" to Palestinians.

It took 12 years just to introduce 3G frequencies to Palestine just last year, Bahour noted.

Analyst Nur Arafeh has detailed how, since the Israeli occupation began in 1967, Israel has in fact sought to incorporate the occupied territories' economy into its own, while allowing for maximum expropriation of land.

Buttu told Al Jazeera that what is crucially lacking is the political will to end the occupation.

"What has been missing all of these years is pressure on Israel to actually let us be free. They've recycled the same concepts, repackaged them but what they're not willing to do is take on Israel. And that's the one issue that's going to set us free - it's getting Israel off of our backs," Buttu said.

Palestinians absent

Several prominent Palestinian businessmen declined the US's invitation to participate in the conference. 

The Palestinian Authority has said it was not consulted about the plan and will not be attending the conference.

The money raised for the economic plan would reportedly be placed in a fund administered by a multinational development bank and the funds would be managed by an appointed board of governors.

$15bn would come from grants, $25bn in subsidised loans and about $11bn would come from private capital.

Notably, there is no mention of Palestinians managing the money.

The plan itself repeatedly mentions "applicable Palestinian authorities", Bahour noted, rather than established entities such as the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The US closed the PLO's office in Washington DC in 2018, while the US does not recognise the State of Palestine.

Kushner has in the past voiced his opinion that Palestinians deserve "self-determination" but are not yet capable of governing themselves.

"It's a very colonial approach, that Palestinians can't govern themselves so we need to have a separate entity that's able to manage the funds," Buttu said.

"Usually when you look at economic development you look at the framework and context of states and yet they're trying to create a plan that doesn't at all involve any state, it doesn't involve the Palestinian Authority. In fact [Kushner's] trying to go around them.

"This all makes a very glossy, nice, pretty 38-page brochure, but in terms of the substance, it's never going to see the light of day because they refuse to address the political circumstances, that of occupation and denial of freedom."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/06/israel-backs-palestinians-react-kushner-plan-190623191830426.html

2019-06-24 07:43:00Z
52780318659196

Minggu, 23 Juni 2019

Trump addresses Iran: “If they do something else, it’ll be double” - Vox.com

President Donald Trump issued a warning to Iran Sunday, saying if the nation were to take further military action against the US, it could expect severe American retaliation.

Trump made the comments during an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press that aired on Sunday in explaining why he decided not to order any physical military retaliation after Iran shot down a US drone it claimed was in its airspace.

“What happened is, I said, ‘I’m not going to do it. I’ll save it. If they do something else, it’ll be double,’” Trump said. He also said, “I’m not looking for war and if there is, it’ll be obliteration like you’ve never seen before.”

The president tweeted Friday he had a limited military strike “cocked & loaded” on Thursday, but that he called it off because it would have resulted in roughly 150 casualties. Speaking to Meet the Press’ Chuck Todd, Trump reiterated this version of events, saying that a “modest but pretty, pretty heavy attack schedule” had been in the works.

When pressed on what would have been a better response, Trump did not mention the cyberattack the US launched against Iran, but instead alluded to a new round of sanctions that he said will be announced on Monday, “We’re increasing the sanctions now. But the response is always going to be very strong.”

Trump also said he doesn’t believe Iran wants armed conflict. “I think they want to negotiate,” he said. “And I think they want to make a deal. And my deal is nuclear.”

The US had a nuclear deal with Iran; it was negotiated under the Obama administration, and involved several other countries, including France, the UK, and China. That deal lifted some sanctions in exchange for Iran dismantling its nuclear program. All of the deal’s signatories were in compliance with it until Trump exited it in 2018.

The president has said since that time that he would negotiate a new deal. But that hasn’t happened, and last week, Iran announced that it, too, would cease to comply with the deal by stockpiling forbidden amounts of uranium.

Sunday, Trump described his vision for a new deal. It would have the same goal as the deal he left, and would seem to offer the Iranian people similar economic benefits.

“Here it is,” the president said. “You can’t have nuclear weapons. And if you want to talk about it, good. Otherwise you can live in a shattered economy for a long time to come.”

Trump went on to say he’d be willing to meet with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, for talks with “no preconditions.”

This is something Trump has advocated for before. As Vox’s Alex Ward wrote, “for decades, American leaders have typically rejected meeting adversaries without setting strict conditions beforehand ... Trump, however, doesn’t seem to care about any of that.”

The president has advocated for meeting with adversaries like Kim Jong Un without preconditions, and shortly after leaving the nuclear deal, Trump said he’d talk with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani without preconditions as well: “Speaking to other people, especially when you’re talking about potentials of war and death and famine ... you meet.”

Not everyone in Trump’s administration shares this view, something he acknowledged Sunday. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton are known to be rather hawkish on Iran. Just before he was appointed to his current post, Bolton called for regime change in the country, saying in a speech, “The declared policy of the United States should be the overthrow of the mullahs’ regime.”

He has not signaled that he’s changed his position much. “Yeah, John Bolton is absolutely a hawk,” Trump told Todd. “If it was up to him he’d take on the whole world at one time, okay?”

But Trump also sought to reduce concerns he could be overly influenced by those in his White House who are pushing for war, saying he counts “both sides” — doves and hawks — among his advisers.

When the topic of conversation turned to another adversary — Russia — Trump did little to allay concerns about Russian interference in the upcoming presidential election. Todd asked if the president planned to bring the issue up with President Vladmir Putin later this week at the G20 summit, the annual international meeting between leaders from 19 countries and the European Union.

“I may,” Trump said.

The question came a week after an interview Trump gave to ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos, in which he said he would accept information from foreign actors if it was offered during his 2020 reelection campaign, and that such information would not constitute foreign interference.

He walked back his statement on Twitter the following morning, writing, “I meet and talk to ‘foreign governments’ every day....Should I immediately call the FBI about these calls and meetings? How ridiculous! I would never be trusted again.”

Todd asked Trump if this statement amounted to an invitation to Putin to meddle in the 2020 election. Trump said no, but did not respond when asked if he’d tell Putin not to meddle in another US election — instead the president attacked the media and said, “Chuck, there’s so much fake news.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/6/23/18693546/iran-donald-trump-meet-press-drone-strike-nuclear-deal-no-preconditions

2019-06-23 18:13:41Z
52780317816762