https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/11/africa/burkina-faso-french-hostage-intl/index.html
2019-05-11 12:55:00Z
52780291204809
President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump officials considering using court-ordered removals to deport migrant families: report Dem senator calls for Senate to investigate Giuliani's planned Ukraine trip Ocasio-Cortez says 'vote your values' after finding Trump supporter sign outside office MORE said Friday it would be “appropriate” for him to discuss opening an investigation into former Vice President Biden and his family with Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrNadler accuses Trump of 'direct assault on the constitutional order' in letter to DOJ Nadler says Mueller will not testify next week Former FBI lawyer defends agency's probe into Trump campaign officials MORE.
Trump told Politico in an interview Friday that he hasn’t talked with Barr about investigating Biden and his family's business dealings but said it would “certainly it would be an appropriate thing" to bring up with the attorney general.
“Certainly it is a very big issue and we’ll see what happens. I have not spoken to him about it. Would I speak to him about it? I haven’t thought of that. I mean, you’re asking me a question I just haven’t thought of,” he told the outlet.
ADVERTISEMENT
The president noted that it could be a “very big situation” for Biden, who has so far led the Democratic presidential primary field in polling since he launched his campaign last month.
“Because he’s a Democrat it’s about 1/100 the size of the fact that if he were a Republican, it would be a lot bigger,” Trump alleged.
Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani last week called for an investigation into Biden for his previous ties to Ukraine after The New York Times reported that while Biden was vice president in 2016, he allegedly threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees unless the country removed a top prosecutor. The prosecutor, ho had been accused of ignoring corruption in his own office, was later voted out.
Biden’s younger son, Hunter Biden, was a board member of an energy company that the prosecutor had been looking into, according to the newspaper.
Giuliani initially planned to travel to Ukraine to encourage Ukraine's president-elect to launch investigations into Biden and the origins of special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE's Russia investigation.
However, Giuliani changed course late Friday, announcing that he had cancelled his trip. The reversal came after Democrats on Capitol Hill accused him of seeking aid from a foreign government.
Biden, the frontrunner among a crowded field of Democrats vying for the White House in 2020, had a 32-point lead over his competitors, according to a Hill-HarrisX poll released earlier this week.
Biden also surpassed Trump by six points in the first poll published after the former vice president officially announced his candidacy in April.
BEIJING—China held back from immediate retaliation for higher U.S. tariffs, unlike in past rounds, taking time to weigh its options amid uncertainty over how the Chinese economy would weather a full-bore trade conflict.
A failure to break an impasse in talks in Washington on Friday opened a new phase in the trade fight after more than five months of back-and-forth negotiations. This time, some economists and analysts said, Beijing is taking stock of potential economic damage from higher tariffs.
The U.S. raised punitive tariffs to 25%, from 10%, for $200 billion in goods leaving China on Friday and thereafter. President Trump also ordered staff to begin the paperwork to impose levies on the more than $300 billion worth of everything else China sells to the U.S.
While Beijing has met previous volleys of tariffs from the U.S. by raising duties on American goods—and the government has promised to retaliate—it held its fire. Though China has more limited tariff options, since it imports fewer products from the U.S. than the other way around, the Chinese leadership is also constrained by an economy that is in a shaky recovery from a sharp slowdown.
The tariff escalation is worrisome for Chinese officials, who are watching potential ripple effects, from weakening of the currency to crimping future foreign investment. Raising existing tariffs or imposing new ones could hit products China’s economy needs, like semiconductors, pork, oil and passenger jets.
A wider-scale trade conflict could also force Beijing to further ease credit and boost government spending to shore up growth, doubling down on the stimulus used last year at a time some analysts say it should be ratcheting back such measures.
“China doesn’t want to fan the flames,” Mark Wu, an international trade professor at Harvard University, says. “It wants to be seen as the reasonable party and open to compromise.”
China’s lead negotiator, Vice Premier Liu He, told Chinese reporters before leaving Washington that the domestic economy is in better shape than last year, with sufficient policy tools and business confidence to withstand pressure and “maintain smooth, healthy development.”
In the aftermath of Friday’s impasse, Mr. Liu stressed that negotiations haven't broken down—a message amplified by state media. Rather, according to video clips posted online by state media, Mr. Liu said negotiations “encountered unavoidable complications” and the two sides have agreed to meet in Beijing in the future.
Negotiations between the U.S. and China seemed to be heading toward an agreement earlier this month when, according to Mr. Trump and U.S. officials, Beijing backtracked on commitments made in earlier rounds. Those included listing specific laws in the agreement that China would change covering intellectual property protection, subsidies and forced technology transfers, according to people in the U.S. and China following the talks.
Mr. Liu, in remarks reported by the Hong Kong news site Phoenix New Media Limited, didn’t specify what caused the negotiations to founder. He disagreed that the Chinese side backtracked, saying in any negotiation changes are natural before a final agreement is reached.
How Beijing moves ahead in coming weeks is likely to depend on its reading of the economy and on the U.S.’s willingness to negotiate, the economists and analysts said.
“The most important thing is to not appear weak and cave into the U.S.,” says Arthur Krober, founding partner at research firm Gavekal Dragonomics. A likely scenario for Beijing, he says, is to “look like you’re staying the course, offer some discreet support if necessary, [and] hope they can get this thing resolved in next month.”
The higher U.S. tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods will slow China’s economy by 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points this year, according to Barclays Research. Fresh 25% levies on the remaining $325 billion in Chinese goods could further drag down growth by up to 0.5 percentage points in the next 12 months, after tariffs go into effect, it said.
“The moment Trump announces a date for tariffs on all Chinese goods, that’s the moment the yuan will drop,” says Bo Zhuang, an economist at research firm TS Lombard. He estimates authorities would allow the currency to swing to as weak as 7.6 yuan to the U.S. dollar, a level that would roughly offset the impact of 25% tariffs on all Chinese imports.
In the next few weeks, China watchers think the leadership will hold back from drastic moves such as reducing banks required reserves to give them more money to lend. Though the two sides haven’t set a date to resume talks, President Xi Jinping and Mr. Trump are both scheduled to attend a Group-of-20 meeting in Japan at the end of June, giving negotiators a target to work toward.
For now, Beijing has only hinted at more stimulus. The central bank on Monday announced a small cut to the amount of reserves certain banks have to keep with it, a show of policy support just after the U.S. threatened tariffs. On Friday, central bank deputy director Zou Wei said in a media briefing that financial support for the property sector would be stable this year.
Previously, Beijing had been expected to ease up on stimulus after the economy grew at a stronger-than-expected 6.4% in the first quarter. Now, “Beijing cannot afford to roll back stimulus,” said Lombard’s Mr. Zhuang. “They’ll have to continue to boost to make less concessions in the trade deal.”
—Chunying Zhang contributed to this article
Write to Chao Deng at Chao.Deng@wsj.com
President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump officials considering using court-ordered removals to deport migrant families: report Dem senator calls for Senate to investigate Giuliani's planned Ukraine trip Ocasio-Cortez says 'vote your values' after finding Trump supporter sign outside office MORE's attorney Rudy Giuliani changed course late Friday, declaring he would no longer go on a planned trip to Ukraine to press for an investigation into Democratic presidential candidate Joe BidenJoseph (Joe) Robinette BidenDem senator calls for Senate to investigate Giuliani's planned Ukraine trip Ocasio-Cortez says 'vote your values' after finding Trump supporter sign outside office Mike Gravel says he 'misspoke' with Buttigieg comment MORE.
Giuliani announced the decision Friday night during an appearance on Fox News, saying "I'm not gonna go," and blaming Democrats for trying to “spin” the trip.
"I think I'm walking into a group of people that are enemies of the President, in some cases enemies of the United States and, in one case, an already convicted person who has been found to be involved in assisting the Democrats with the 2016 election," Giuliani said, without clarifying to whom he was referring.
ADVERTISEMENT
The news came hours after Trump told Politico in an interview that he planned to speak with Giuliani about his trip and the investigation.
“I will speak to him about it before he leaves. I’m just curious about that,” he told the outlet, saying that he has “not spoken to him at any great length” about his attorney's trip.
Giuliani first revealed his plans to travel to Ukraine in an interview with The New York Times on Thursday. The president's lawyer said he hoped to meet in the nation's capital, Kiev, to ask the country's president-elect to pursue inquiries that could yield new information about the origin of the Russia investigation and former Vice President Biden's past influence in the country.
The Times reported that the meeting's goal was to try to undermine the credibility of special counsel Robert Mueller's probe, as well as the case against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Trump's allies are also reportedly seeking information that could hurt Biden, who has been a clear front-runner in recent polls for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.
Giuliani last week called for an investigation into Biden after The Times reported that Biden allegedly threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees in 2016 unless Ukraine removed a top prosecutor, who was later voted out. Biden’s younger son, Hunter Biden, was a board member of an energy company that the prosecutor had been looking into, according to the newspaper.
Democrats on Capitol Hill lambasted Giuliani over the proposed trip, accusing him of seeking aid from a foreign government.
House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerHistory will judge sycophantic Republicans harshly The Hill's Morning Report - Can Barr and House Dems avert contempt clash? CNN, Fox, MSNBC air split-screens of Nadler and empty chair for Barr MORE (D-N.Y.) slammed the move, saying, “We have come to a very sorry state when it is considered O.K. for an American politician, never mind an attorney for the president, to go and seek foreign intervention in American politics.”
In a tweet, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffHouse Dems allege Trump subpoena lawsuit is stonewalling 'legitimate' congressional probes Instagram blocks #VaccinesKill, reviewing other anti-vaccine hashtags Schiff says Congress weighing hefty fines for Trump officials who evade subpoenas MORE (D-Calif.) called the plan “immoral, unethical, unpatriotic and, now, standard procedure.”
Giuliani added to Fox News on Friday that he won't go to Ukraine "in order to remove any political suggestion."
"I will step back and I'll just watch it unfold," he said.
The news comes after Mueller earlier this year concluded his probe into whether the Trump campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election. Mueller did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with Russia, though he detailed extensive contacts between Trump associates and Russian figures.
Democrats are pushing for an unredacted version of the Mueller report, over which Trump has exerted executive privilege. The House Judiciary Committee voted this week to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over Mueller's unredacted report and the underlying evidence.
HONG KONG — Anger over a proposal that would let people suspected of crimes be extradited to mainland China led to pandemonium in Hong Kong’s legislature on Saturday, as lawmakers scuffled and at least one was carried out of the chamber on a stretcher.
It was the most vivid display to date of the deep divide in the semiautonomous Chinese city over the legislation. Tens of thousands of people marched on the Legislative Council last month to protest the bill, the largest demonstration in Hong Kong since the pro-democracy Umbrella Movement in 2014.
The bill would let Hong Kong’s government send people suspected of crimes to jurisdictions with which it does not currently have extradition agreements. The government says it is urgently needed because a Hong Kong man accused of killing his girlfriend in Taiwan last year could otherwise go free.
Both sides of the dispute agree that the man should face trial. But opposition lawmakers, rights groups, lawyers’ associations, foreign governments and prominent voices in Hong Kong’s powerful business community have expressed concern that the extradition bill would subject people in the city to the mainland Chinese legal system, which is opaque and heavily influenced by the governing Communist Party.
Pro-democracy opposition lawmakers have tried to stop the bill, proposing a narrower alternative that would allow extradition only to Taiwan. The opposition, which lost much of its clout after several pro-democracy lawmakers were disqualified in 2016 and 2017, is waging a procedural fight against the proposal.
The chaos erupted on Saturday as two committees tried to meet simultaneously to consider the bill — one led by the opposition and the other by pro-Beijing lawmakers, each claiming that the other was illegitimate. Gary Fan, a member of the opposition camp, was taken out of the legislature on a stretcher after he fell while trying to take a microphone away from another politician. His office said later that he was conscious and awaiting treatment at a hospital.
The government has said it needs the bill’s broad authorization for extraditions to keep the city from becoming a haven for criminal suspects. But opponents say opening up extraditions to mainland China would further erode the unique legal status of Hong Kong, a former British colony that returned to China in 1997 under a framework called “one country, two systems.” That arrangement allows the city its own government and legal and economic systems, as well as far better protection of civil liberties than on the mainland.
Mainland China has long been excluded from Hong Kong’s extradition agreements. On Thursday, the city’s top official, Carrie Lam, denied that that was because of concerns about the quality of its judicial system. Several opposition lawmakers were removed from that meeting for interrupting Ms. Lam and calling her a liar.
After business groups raised concerns this year that the bill could put people at risk of being sent to the mainland over financial disputes, the government dropped nine economic crimes from the list of offenses that could lead to extradition.
But that did not mollify all the bill’s critics. The Hong Kong Bar Association asked last month why, if mainland courts could not be trusted to deal with economic crimes, they should be trusted with handling other criminal cases.
This past week, a United States congressional commission sharply criticized the extradition proposal, saying it “would diminish Hong Kong’s reputation as a safe place for U.S. and international business operations, and could pose increased risks for U.S. citizens and port calls in the territory.”
The report also said the bill could violate provisions of the U.S.-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, which outlines American policy toward the city. Under that legislation, if Hong Kong is deemed to be insufficiently autonomous from China, the president can suspend agreements with the city on trade, investment, visas and extraditions.
Edward Yau, Hong Kong’s commerce secretary, said the questions raised by the American commission’s report showed why Hong Kong lawmakers needed to examine the proposal “so that we can make the bill workable and we can allow different views to be expressed.”
Taiwan officials have asked the Hong Kong authorities for help in extraditing Chan Tong-kai, the man suspected of killing his girlfriend. But they have also raised objections to the legislation. China considers self-governing Taiwan to be part of its territory, and Taiwan has said it will oppose any agreement that undermines its sovereignty.
A spokesman for Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council said on Thursday that Taiwan would not pursue the extradition of Mr. Chan if the extradition legislation put Taiwanese visitors and residents in Hong Kong at risk of being sent to mainland China. Opposition lawmakers say that undermines the government’s claim that the bill must be passed now.
Mr. Chan was convicted in Hong Kong last month of money laundering in connection with the possession of his dead girlfriend’s cash and valuables, and he was sentenced to 29 months in prison. With time served and good behavior, he could be released in October, said John Lee, Hong Kong’s secretary for security.
Local officials have said they fear Mr. Chan could flee the city after his release unless an extradition arrangement with Taiwan is reached first.
Fighting erupted in Hong Kong's legislature on Saturday over planned changes to the law allowing suspects to be sent to mainland China for trial.
Several lawmakers were injured and one was taken to hospital as politicians clashed in the chamber.
Critics believe the proposed switch to the extradition law would erode Hong Kong's freedoms.
But authorities say they need to make the change so they can extradite a murder suspect to Taiwan.
One pro-Beijing lawmaker called it "a sad day for Hong Kong".
Pro-democracy lawmaker James To originally led the session on the controversial extradition bill but earlier this week those supportive of the new law replaced him as chairman.
Tensions boiled over on Saturday, with politicians swearing and jumping over tables amid a crowd of reporters as they fought to control the microphone.
Pro-democracy legislator Gary Fan collapsed and was carried out on a stretcher, while one pro-Beijing legislator was later seen with his arm in a sling.
Under a policy known as "One Country, Two Systems", Hong Kong has a separate legal system to mainland China.
Beijing regained control over the former British colony in 1997 on the condition it would allow the territory "a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs" for 50 years.
But Hong Kong's pro-Beijing leader Carrie Lam earlier this year announced plans to change the law so suspects could be extradited to Taiwan, Macau or mainland China on a case-by-case basis.
Ms Lam has cited the case of a 19-year-old Hong Kong man who allegedly murdered his pregnant girlfriend while on holiday in Taiwan before fleeing home.
While Taiwan has sought his extradition, Hong Kong officials say they cannot help as they do not have an extradition agreement with Taiwan.
The proposed change has generated huge criticism.
Protesters against the law marched on the streets last month in the biggest rally since 2014's pro-democracy Umbrella Movement demonstrations.
Even the normally conservative business community has objected. The International Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong said the bill has "gross inadequacies" which could mean people risk "losing freedom, property and even their life".
And Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, told the government-funded broadcaster RTHK last month the proposal was "an assault on Hong Kong's values, stability and security".