Armed gang demanded a ransom
'A quiet and peaceful' handover
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/08/africa/uganda-us-tourist-rescued/index.html
2019-04-08 10:33:00Z
52780262469321
CNN's Brent Swails, Christina Maxouris, Hilary McGann, Samson Ntale, Bukola Adebayo, Robyn Kriel, Ryan Browne and Anna Cardovilis contributed to this report.
Former Texas congressman Beto O’Rourke lambasted Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday, labeling the Israeli prime minister a “racist” who neither represents the “true will of the Israeli people” nor the “best interests” of the relationship between the United States and Israel.
The Democrat was in Iowa over the weekend to drum up support for his run for president when a voter asked him to comment on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, CNN reported. In his response, O’Rourke criticized Netanyahu as a racist leader who had obstructed peace in the region.
“This is somebody who, in a previous election, warned Arabs were coming to the polls. It’s racism,” O’Rourke said, referring to a warning about “droves of Arabs” that the Israeli leader had issued to his supporters in 2015.
“This is somebody who now no longer subscribes to a two-state solution and has vowed to annex the West Bank which will make peace, in the long term, impossible,” O’Rourke continued. “This is someone who has joined far-right parties who are inherently racist in their speech and the way that they want to treat their fellow human beings in that part of the world.”
Netanyahu, who has been dogged by allegations of corruption and is up for reelection this week, vowed over the weekend to annex Jewish settlements in the West Bank if voters return him to power. He has also sought to form a coalition with the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, whose views have been slammed as “reprehensible” by the American Jewish Committee and “hateful and extremist” by the Anti-Defamation League.
Speaking to reporters following his rally on Sunday, O’Rourke said the U.S.-Israel relationship needs to “transcend” Netanyahu’s leadership.
“The U.S.-Israel relationship is one of the most important relationships that we have on the planet, and that relationship, if it is successful, must transcend partisanship in the United States, and it must be able to transcend a prime minister who is racist,” O’Rourke said, referring to Netanyahu.
18 PHOTOS
Beto O'Rourke throughout his political career
See Gallery
See Gallery
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE
“We must be able to transcend his current leadership to make sure that that alliance is strong, that we continue to push for and settle for nothing less than a two-state solution because that is the best opportunity for peace for the people of Israel and the people of Palestine,” O’Rourke added, per CNN. “It is the best opportunity for the full human rights of everyone who is living in that region.”
O’Rourke’s comments were in stark contrast to the close alliance that President Donald Trump has forged with Netanyahu. Last month, Trump reversed decades of U.S. policy when he announced his decision to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the disputed territory of the Golan Heights ― a move widely seen as boosting Netanyahu’s chances at the polls.
More from HuffPost US:
#MeToo founder Tarana Burke calls Biden's response 'disrespectful and inexcusable'
Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams defends Joe Biden
7 women have now said Joe Biden's touches made them uncomfortable
CNN's Brent Swails, Christina Maxouris, Hilary McGann, Samson Ntale, Bukola Adebayo, Robyn Kriel, Ryan Browne and Anna Cardovilis contributed to this report.
The U.K.'s political future looks as uncertain as ever this week with cross-party talks over Brexit still bearing no compromise ahead of crucial decisions that need to be made.
Meanwhile on the continent, all eyes are on EU leaders who will meet Wednesday and must decide whether to grant the U.K. more time to leave the bloc, or not.
Last week, Prime Minister Theresa May requested an extension to Brexit to June 30 but there are strong signals of dissent in Europe over granting the U.K. more time; France, in particular, is not keen. The U.K. is due to leave the EU on April 12 if the EU does not grant the country an extension to Brexit.
A majority of U.K. lawmakers have rejected her Brexit deal three times, while also rejecting a no-deal Brexit and failing to reach a consensus for any alternative options. May has now resorted to holding talks with her political rival, Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn, to find a way out of the Brexit impasse.
Talks have so far yielded little agreement, however, and are expected to continue Monday.
As it stands, if the EU refuses to grant the U.K. an extension to June 30 (or counter-propose a longer extension) the U.K. could be faced with a stark choice on Friday April 12 — leave the EU without a deal in place or revoke the whole departure process (known as Article 50) entirely.
The political uncertainty and confusion in the U.K. has riled politicians and the public alike with frustration over the length of time that Brexit is taking. Britain was originally due to leave the bloc on March 29 but was granted more time as no deal had been ratified.
European Parliament elections in late May are a key focus for the EU and Brexit is a complicated and unwanted distraction. There is therefore no certainty over what decision EU leaders will take Wednesday.
EU Council President Donald Tusk has suggested a one-year extension to Brexit but French President Emmanuel Macron has said there should be tough conditions imposed on the U.K. if it's given any further time.
Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said Saturday that he considered it highly unlikely that EU leaders would veto a proposal to grant Britain more time, however, and that any country that did "wouldn't be forgiven for it."
Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank, said the bank expects the EU to "reluctantly grant the U.K. a further Brexit delay" just because the alternative — "a hard Brexit with even more political chaos in a country that will remain a close neighbour, is just too bad."
"Most of the cautious comments by EU27 decision makers point that way. Still, deciding unanimously at the 10 April emergency summit to give the U.K. even more time to sort itself out will not come easy for the EU27. It raises serious concerns and a grave tail risk," he said in a note Monday.
"The EU27 may ask why a new delay should finally help the U.K. to get its act together if the first delay has not done the trick."
May has been criticized by pro-Brexit members of her own Conservative Party and Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) on whose support she has relied upon in a minority government.
She has defended her decision to talk to Labour, however, tweeting a video Sunday in which she said she could not see Parliament accepting her Brexit deal after it was rejected three times and that "the choice that lies ahead of us is either leaving the European Union with a deal or not leaving at all."
Tweet:
Brexit has been the main focus point for sterling for months and the currency fell to a one-week low of $1.2987 on Friday as France and the Netherlands expressed doubt about May's plan to further delay Brexit. It had rebounded Monday to trade at $1.3064. London's FTSE 100 index trading lower Monday morning.
Simon Derrick, the chief currency strategist at BNY Mellon, likened sterling's state of limbo to the thought experiment called "Schrodinger's Cat" — the paradox of a cat being placed in a box with something that could kill it — but the observer not knowing whether it is alive or dead (and thus the cat is both alive and dead) before the box is opened.
Similarly, sterling's fate can't be known until the end of the week, Derrick told CNBC on Monday.
"(Sterling is like) Schrodinger's currency," he told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe."
"It's worth either $1.50 or $1.10 dependent on the outcome of Brexit but you don't know until that happens. Until you open the box you don't know and Brexit is the box."
Derrick noted that the $1.30 price has been the average price against the dollar since the 2016 referendum "and here we are stuck to it."
"It is entirely possible that by the end of the week we get to the point of finding out that we've actually opened the box," he added.
There's "a perfectly reasonable chance" that the prime minister goes to the European Council with no plan on Wednesday, Derrick said, and it was also "entirely possible that France, Spain and possibly Belgium go 'no plan, no extension' and that at the end of the week we're looking at making a choice," Derrick added.
"The choices are between a no-deal Brexit or revocation … It's by no means clear what the actual result would be … It's entirely possible that you could have a no deal Brexit, it's equally possible that it might be revoked," he said.
The Bank of England (BOE) forecast last November that a no-deal Brexit — in which there is no transition period allowing the U.K. to adjust to life outside the bloc — could cause the U.K.'s economy to shrink by 8% and warned that house prices could drop by a third.
Last week, BOE Governor Mark Carney again warned of the risks of a no-deal Brexit, telling Sky News that an "accidental disorderly" no-deal Brexit could happen. The latest growth data released March showed the U.K. grew 0.2 percent in the fourth quarter, from the previous quarter.
Economists say the economy is already being damaged by businesses holding back investment. "There are different parts of the economy which are affected but probably the one which is affected the most is the business investment," George Buckley, chief U.K. & European Economist at Nomura, told CNBC Monday.
"If you're a company thinking of investing and you're faced with this uncertainty why would you invest in the U.K. right now rather than wait it out and make sure you have more clarity over what situation you'll be facing."
WASHINGTON – In an unprecedented step to ramp up pressure on Tehran, the Trump administration is planning to designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard a "foreign terrorist organization." The move is expected to further isolate Iran and could have widespread implications for U.S. personnel and policy in the Middle East and elsewhere.
The Trump administration has escalated rhetoric against Iran for months, but this will mark the first such designation by any American administration of an entire foreign government entity. Portions of the Guard, notably its elite Quds Force, have been targeted previously by the United States.
Officials informed of the step said an announcement was expected as early as Monday.
Two U.S. officials and a congressional aide confirmed the planned move. They were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. Iran's foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, seemed to anticipate the designation, saying in a tweet Sunday aimed at President Donald Trump that Trump "should know better than to be conned into another US disaster."
This would be just the latest move by the Trump administration to isolate Iran. Trump withdrew from the Obama administration's landmark nuclear deal with Iran in May 2018 and in the months that followed, reimposed punishing sanctions including those targeting Iran's oil, shipping and banking sectors.
The Revolutionary Guard designation, planning for which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, comes with sanctions, including freezes on assets the Guard may have in U.S. jurisdictions and a ban on Americans doing business with it or providing material support for its activities.
Although the Guard has broad control and influence over the Iranian economy, such penalties from the U.S. may have limited impact. The designation, however, could significantly complicate U.S. military and diplomatic work, notably in Iraq, where many Shiite militias and Iraqi political parties have close ties to the Guard. And in Lebanon, where the Guard has close ties to Hezbollah, which is part of the Lebanese government.
Without exclusions or waivers to the designation, U.S. troops and diplomats could be barred from contact with Iraqi or Lebanese authorities who interact with Guard officials or surrogates.
The Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies have raised concerns about the impact of the designation if the move does not allow contact with foreign officials who may have met with or communicated with Guard personnel. Those concerns have in part dissuaded previous administrations from taking the step, which has been considered for more than a decade.
It was not immediately clear whether the designation would include such carve-outs.
In addition to those complications, American commanders are concerned that the designation may prompt Iran to retaliate against U.S. forces in the region, and those commanders plan to warn U.S. troops remaining in Iraq, Syria and elsewhere of that possibility, according to a third U.S. official. This official was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Aside from Iraq, where some 5,200 American troops are stationed, and Syria, where some U.S. 2,000 troops remain, the U.S. 5th Fleet, which operates in the Persian Gulf from its base in Bahrain, and the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, are potentially at risk.
A similar warning is also expected from the State Department of possible Iranian retaliation against American interests, including embassies and consulates, and anti-American protests, the first two U.S. officials said. Similar alerts were issued at the start of the Iraq War in 2003 and more recently when the Trump administration announced it would recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital.
Despite the risks, Iran hard-liners on Capitol Hill, such as Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and elsewhere have long advocated for the designation. They say it will send an important message to Iran as well as deal it a further blow after Trump pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal and reimposed economic sanctions.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton have taken up the call and have in recent months spoken stridently about Iran and its "malign activities" in the region.
Pompeo has made clear in public comments that pressure on Tehran will only increase until it changes its behavior. Just last week, Pompeo's special representative for Iran, Brian Hook, accused Iran and its proxies of being responsible for the death of 608 U.S. troops in Iraq between 2003 and 2011. He cited newly declassified Defense Department information for the claim, which is expected to be used in the justification for the Guard designation.
"Secretary Pompeo will continue to use all the tools at our disposal to press the regime to change its destructive policies for the benefit of peace in the region and for the sake of its own people, who are the longest-suffering victims of this regime," Hook said, in an indication that new action is coming.
The department currently designates 60 groups, such as al-Qaida and the Islamic State and their various affiliates, Hezbollah and numerous militant Palestinian factions, as "foreign terrorist organizations." But none of them is a state-run military.
Once a designation is announced by the secretary of state in coordination with the Treasury secretary, Congress has seven days to review it. If there are no objections, it then will take effect.
___
Associated Press reporter Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.
A suspected rhino poacher in South Africa was killed by an elephant before his body was apparently devoured by lions, authorities said. A search team in Kruger National Park was only able to recover a skull and a pair of pants.
South African National Parks said Friday that the victim and four accomplices were trying to poach a rhino Tuesday evening. The accomplices called the victim's family and said he had been killed by an elephant.
An initial search party was unable to locate the body. During a search Thursday morning, authorities found the few remains of the suspected poacher. "Indications found at the scene suggested that a pride of lions had devoured the remains," the park service said.
The South African Police Service said two of his alleged accomplices were arrested with rifles and ammunition in their possession.
"Entering Kruger National Park illegally and on foot is not wise, it holds many dangers and this incident is evidence of that," Kruger National Park Managing Executive Glenn Phillips said in a statement. "It is very sad to see the daughters of the [deceased] mourning the loss of their father, and worse still, only being able to recover very little of his remains."
The suspected poacher has not been identified. His four accomplices are due in court, and the death is still being investigated.